Would You Stand Up For What Is Right?

sm8

Active Member
I would suspect an error in using the ' vice the " symbols.

That was my first thought but still wanted to ask for clarification. It just seems odd that so many people would be out to get one person without some sort of provocation. Even if it is something as simple as they were all neighbors for years and then a "newcomer" just moved in. It just feels like there has to be more back story that is missing.
 

SEABREEZE 1957

My 401K is now a 201K
Well, only reading one side of the story, I must say I'd be upset if someone did whatever they did to cause my property to be flooded when it rained. I think some more 'before' pictures would be beneficial. I also question the 29'...perhaps 29"?
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
Welcome to the Forums! have a nice day......

ummm I'm guessing it's more like welcome back.
Sounds like a crank that posted here a while back.

and this wouldn't be a political smear on Cindy Jones, or coincidence that it was posted on election day?
 

Beta

Smile!
It's well known that posting on internet forums about pending court actions can negatively impact a plaintiff's case.

Facts are facts, yes. However statements as to intent and character are legally risky, and I see more than a few in OP's postings. Any smart lawyer would use this thread to influence a jury or judge. It's not about "crazy", it's about character.

Random account? When the OP clearly claims to be the aggrieved party? It would be straightforward to prove that the aggrieved neighbor was the account holder, especially since a confirmed email address is on file with the forum.

I have no interest in this thread or the OP's problems. I just hate seeing this kind of mess playing out in public especially when it's legally risky. Take it offline and don't get yourself in further trouble. Of course, there are plenty of people here who probably love watching the train wreck.

:lol:

It's well known that posting on internet forums impacts court cases that are supposed to look into the facts of a case? So now judges and juries read the forums and it impacts their decision? Just stop talking.

I was merely saying that if this claim is false, then it could be any random person. If it's true, then it's tough to say it's "slander." Either way, even if the person used a legit e-mail account that could link them directly to the account, I doubt the forum owners will choose to provide it to the courts.

This might help you realize that there's little chance they'll bother suing, let alone winning: http://www.reputationhawk.com/onlinedefamation.html
 

MADPEBS1

Man, I'm still here !!!
Steve Waugh 44%
Cindy Jones 29%

there are always two sides to story, so who put the ugly fence RIGHT on the paved rod, You? I'd be pizzed if i was having to look at that too! !!!! I'm sure the rain pictures were from same rain i had that flooded our parking lot. What's NORMAL rain runoff like...
 

Beta

Smile!
Steve Waugh 44%
Cindy Jones 29%

there are always two sides to story, so who put the ugly fence RIGHT on the paved rod, You? I'd be pizzed if i was having to look at that too! !!!! I'm sure the rain pictures were from same rain i had that flooded our parking lot. What's NORMAL rain runoff like...

I am impressed that so much of the county reads these forums and changed their vote to Waugh. Jones should sue!!!

:duh:
 

out4aride55

New Member
Well, only reading one side of the story, I must say I'd be upset if someone did whatever they did to cause my property to be flooded when it rained. I think some more 'before' pictures would be beneficial. I also question the 29'...perhaps 29"?

The road has a 60' ROW coming off of county road and a sharp right corner onto a 50' ROW to the end of the dirt road. From said property that's on the corner of both roads coming together, the 60' ROW isn't but 22' wide, and the 50' ROW isn't but 14' wide, with a 7' undriven shoulder/easement behind fence. County states, 10' easements on both sides of property boundaries for utilities.
 

out4aride55

New Member
I am impressed that so much of the county reads these forums and changed their vote to Waugh. Jones should sue!!!

:duh:

How do you know that people changed their vote from reading this thread? Did you change who you were supporting and was voting for? If your supporting someone and know them than it would not matter what anyone else says, you might hear, read about, or see. This thread did not change my mind of who I was supporting and voted for regardless.
 
How do you know that people changed their vote from reading this thread? Did you change who you were supporting and was voting for? If your supporting someone and know them than it would not matter what anyone else says, you might hear, read about, or see. This thread did not change my mind of who I was supporting and voted for regardless.

YIKES! Take a pill or something! I think Beta's sarcasm was pretty obvious.
 

out4aride55

New Member
Steve Waugh 44%
Cindy Jones 29%

there are always two sides to story, so who put the ugly fence RIGHT on the paved rod, You? I'd be pizzed if i was having to look at that too! !!!! I'm sure the rain pictures were from same rain i had that flooded our parking lot. What's NORMAL rain runoff like...

There are alot of witnesses concerning this matter and the truth is coming out. Those who have been dishonest and or blind to the facts do not want the truth to be told.

The new fence is not on the dirt ROW, it is on said property. The old driveway to said property was millings, not paved, and has been removed from the undriven shoulder/easement.

All rainfall needs somewhere to run-off, but when you only have a little part of the original drainage ditch "that's not been covered yet", the run-off will fill that area quickly. Once that area is filled up the run-off will overflow onto the driven roadway and across to another's property. Thus causing damages to the road and another's property.
 

MADPEBS1

Man, I'm still here !!!
not to get into your sh1t, but there probably was a reason a PRIVACY fence was put. i hate them and would be pizzed if one got put up also. But it's your property and so be it...
 

vince77

Active Member
There are alot of witnesses concerning this matter and the truth is coming out. Those who have been dishonest and or blind to the facts do not want the truth to be told.

The new fence is not on the dirt ROW, it is on said property. The old driveway to said property was millings, not paved, and has been removed from the undriven shoulder/easement.

All rainfall needs somewhere to run-off, but when you only have a little part of the original drainage ditch "that's not been covered yet", the run-off will fill that area quickly. Once that area is filled up the run-off will overflow onto the driven roadway and across to another's property. Thus causing damages to the road and another's property.

If you believe you've been damaged, find an attorney who will take your case and go to court. There are more than 30,000 attorneys in Maryland.
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
Being a nut job never helps your case.

And that's the bottom line. If they were complaining about property line/easement/right of way issues that would be one thing. But to turn a property dispute into a paranoid rant is taking it to a new level.
 

officeguy

Well-Known Member
If you believe you've been damaged, find an attorney who will take your case and go to court. There are more than 30,000 attorneys in Maryland.

This is the kind if case that is mostly processed on paper. Doesn't matter if the atty is in chuck co.
 
Top