Not sure what the hell you are talking about. In post 63 you say you want a cooling off period and now you want vetting (how about some extreme vetting?), none of which has a thing to do with what I said I wanted in response to the question I bolded in PsyOps's post.
I mean what I said. In my original post. I think I quoted you by mistake, instead meaning to quote I believe BD before you. My bad, I think.
Saying that, I could have been more specific: the cooling off period was in relation to gun buyers not being able to obtain their legally purchased weapons for the federally mandated three to five days, giving the buyer or seller time to reneg on the deal. I put the same time frame on "journalists" before their "news" can be published in print, because there is basically no news announcements anymore without being completely tainted and scrip0ted in an agenda driven motive.
That's ridiculous, right? Just as ridiculous as adding new laws to the myriad already on the books, federal, state, and local concerning gun laws. I like the original title of the thread, in essence, mess with my 2! rights, I mess with your 1! rights.
You're ot going to be able to refuse sales to someone you deem unfit without infringing on other rights.