Nothing to back up your claim, eh?
Crews Remove Taney Statue From Maryland State House Overnight
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Nothing to back up your claim, eh?
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I have never seen this monument to black people in Lexington Park.
But:
1. If I did it wouldn't bother me.
2. it wouldn't offend me.
3. I would imagine many black people would be offended if someone wanted to tear it down.
Like the carvings on Stone Mountain. You have to go out of your way to see them.
If it offends you. Don't go there.
But:
1. If I did it wouldn't bother me.
2. it wouldn't offend me.
3. I would imagine many black people would be offended if someone wanted to tear it down.
Like the carvings on Stone Mountain. You have to go out of your way to see them.
If it offends you. Don't go there.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
You mean like all of these confederate monuments that whites are so up in arms over? Yeah, that's really whites seeing the future.
RIF. My statement is clearly backed up by the opinions of the court.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Whites are not up in arms over the Confederate statues.
BLM and Antifa are up in arms over them.
They are the ones who want them torn down.
If Antifa and BLM had not started this BS, white people were perfectly content to leave them there and not make trouble.
LightRoasted
If I may ...
If I may ...
Here ya go ... http://www.thebaynet.com/articles/0817/adifferentkindofmonumentrighthereinourhometown.html
Here ya go ... http://www.thebaynet.com/articles/0817/adifferentkindofmonumentrighthereinourhometown.html
The one that voted 7-2 in the decision?..or some other court?
Do you support painting over the name of the USCG cutter Taney berthed in Inner Harbor? Or do you want to see the ship removed?
Last edited:
USCGC Taney is fine. It was named after Secretary of the Treasury Roger B. Taney, not Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.
glhs837
Power with Control
Ha, you with your cute little facts
If I don't know that by looking at the ship, I'm triggered just the same so change it!!!!!
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
if whites were not up in arms over it there would not have been a march of kkk, white nationalist, and other torch carrying idiots in Charlottesville. Not to mention the numerous idiots like you on thousands of sites across the net who have been screaming about destroying history because society is taking down monuments to defeated enemies of our country.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
That shows how really stupid you are. Whites walked past those statues every day, the statues bothered no one and whites did not have a care about them until idiots like yourself wanted them removed. Then the people came out to protest. It would have been a peaceful protest if the terrorists stayed home..
Which country is that, Mo? Prior to the War of Northern Aggression, everyone's allegiance was to their respective states before country. Thought everyone knew that.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Never argue with a pig , Both get dirty and the pig likes it. I have stated my opinion on this matter and midnight can kiss my white hairy hole.
You know they like that kinda thing.
This_person
Well-Known Member
"Whites" are as "up in arms" about it, as demonstrated by KKK marchers, as American Muslims are "up in arms" about ISIS. You can tell by the number of the marchers compared to the overall number of the subject population.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
Then why did they write a constitution and form the USA in the first place? You can pretend that there was no country, but that's just a straight up lie.
You really are stupid Mo.
And you are the most obtuse, ignorant, biased and uneducated POS that ever graced this forum. But don't take my word for it...take a poll.
I bet you don't even realize how long the ratification process took, how many states so very reluctantly came to pass it, by how small margins in some cases, and. most importantly, why that was so.
Simply put, you are a far-left tool...just like Sappy, the boy..and the other Soros-paid retards that appear and disappear on a regular basis as you roll through one MPD after another. Too bad you never made it past high school.........boy. You are an utter failure.
Last edited:
hotbikermama40
New Member
Because the government was weak, which allowed the states to act like individual countries - instead of cohesively supporting the confederation. Early leader Alexander Hamilton saw the writing on the wall, that America's newly won independence was in jeopardy, and called for the constitutional convention so that delegates from each of the 13 states could come together and brainstorm how they were going to resolve the issue of a young and unstable republic and make changes to the Articles of the Confederation. It took almost the entire summer of 1787 for the "framers" of the constitution to debate and hash out every controversy and issue, like slavery and national representation, realize they actually needed a whole new system of government and come to agreement in the form of the Constitution.
from Gilligan's post: "...everyone's allegiance was to their respective states before country".
Nah...you're just an ####### who likes to make noise and annoy people.
LightRoasted
If I may ...
If I may ...
You do realize that in and of itself, during those times, the States United was not a country. That each "state" was in and of itself its own country? That each "state" country had, and still to this day have, its very own State Department? Each "state" country, joined the union to provide for the common defense, to ensure fair trade between the "states" countries, and administer trade disputes among many other things. The war was in actuality a war against the federal government because it was not enforcing, nor abiding by, the contract, the US Constitution, and had northern "states" countries give it their support, supplies and men, for the federal (Union) Army and Navy. The United States is not a country, but a union of 50 countries. Similar to the very young European Union, the EU. So when you say, "...society is taking down monuments to defeated enemies of our country." You are only proving how hard it is to educate a black person such as yourself.
You do realize that in and of itself, during those times, the States United was not a country. That each "state" was in and of itself its own country? That each "state" country had, and still to this day have, its very own State Department? Each "state" country, joined the union to provide for the common defense, to ensure fair trade between the "states" countries, and administer trade disputes among many other things. The war was in actuality a war against the federal government because it was not enforcing, nor abiding by, the contract, the US Constitution, and had northern "states" countries give it their support, supplies and men, for the federal (Union) Army and Navy. The United States is not a country, but a union of 50 countries. Similar to the very young European Union, the EU. So when you say, "...society is taking down monuments to defeated enemies of our country." You are only proving how hard it is to educate a black person such as yourself.