Did Harley Davidson go to India w/Obama

itsbob

I bowl overhand
So - as a business, Harley should take the parts, ship them here, build them here, and then ship the bike back to sell in India? This won't increase cost and make them less competitive in the Indian market?

For people who preach free'er markets, less government intervention, and capitalism one way, you seem to be implying there should be intervention the other way?

Just saying - if you truly believe in the idea of capitalism and less government intervention, then you can't complain about a company making a smart business decision to be competitive in an emerging market. Emerging markets are the only way to truly grow for large companies. You can't depend on growth in just the American market.

Also - it forces labor here to be more competitive if its truly a labor decision (this decision, if reversed, would involve duplicating shipping processes and increasing expenses, as well). Maybe if unions stop pushing for large increases at the expense of corporations, it wouldn't force so many labor cost decisions.

Not intervention, just tell us the truth. American jobs are going to India, and he's going there to announce it.

As it is India just allowed Harley to be sold in their country two or three years ago. Harley's don't meet their stringent clean air laws, but under Bush we made a trade agreement that we would buy x tons of mangoes a year from India (lifting an 18 year old Trade Embargo), if they allowed Harley to sell x amount of bikes a year. India waived their clean air requirements for Harley to sell there, and we now have Mangoes in the US year round.

Mangoes for Harleys



So now he takes the work Bush has done and takes it to the next liberal level (which has become the norm)

AND the parts for Harley aren't all made here. A lot of Harley parts (depending on the model Harley) are built in Europe.. SO send the parts from Europe to India, put the bikes together then ship them to the US.
 
Last edited:

ylexot

Super Genius
York County, Pennsylvania.

Since you are slow,
Harley instead is closing one of its two local plants, cutting hundreds of jobs and making other structural changes after members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 175 ratified a contract with concessions.
 

Baz

This. ------------------>
If they were closing plants here an moving that manufacturing function to India, yes, that would be bad.
...

Since you are slow,

Since you are slow, we're discussing closing plants and moving them to India, not within the U.S..

Unless....


.... the REAL reason Obama's going to India is to give Pennsylvania to India!!! :jameo:
 

ylexot

Super Genius
Since you are slow, we're discussing closing plants and moving them to India, not within the U.S..

Unless....


.... the REAL reason Obama's going to India is to give Pennsylvania to India!!! :jameo:

Actually, we're talking about losing jobs in the US and creating new ones in India. Did you miss this part:
cutting hundreds of jobs
 

thatguy

New Member
Actually, we're talking about losing jobs in the US and creating new ones in India. Did you miss this part:

the part that you haven't shown is that the two are in any way connected, even casually.

also, you are missing the reason the jobs are being lost..... from your link it seems the union has priced themselves out of buisness
 

ylexot

Super Genius
the part that you haven't shown is that the two are in any way connected, even casually.
The timing of it lost on you?

also, you are missing the reason the jobs are being lost..... from your link it seems the union has priced themselves out of buisness
Well, duh! I'm not missing it. I figured it was self-explanatory.

Of course, I also thought it would be pretty self-explanatory that when something is done in the US and then stops being done in the US because it is going to be done in India, that is moving jobs from the US to India.
 

Sparx

New Member
It's simply capitalism by a multi-national, publicly held corporation. Don't act like you support American maufaturing jobs now. That ship left the dock years ago. God forbid our giant government would regulate corporations who are outsourcing jobs overseas. That would be way too socialistic. Hell, that would verge on communism.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
It's simply capitalism by a multi-national, publicly held corporation. Don't act like you support American maufaturing jobs now. That ship left the dock years ago. God forbid our giant government would regulate corporations who are outsourcing jobs overseas. That would be way too socialistic. Hell, that would verge on communism.

You are not that dumb. I know you are not.

Reagan;

If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”

If a company gets big enough, it becomes a target of governemnt affections. Not unwillingly mind you, because government affections can mean government protections from competitors. The unions are happy, the locals are happy, the company is happy, the shareholders are happy. Consumers pay for it all.

The problems start when, say, GM has gotten so big and bloated that it can't adapt to competition it can't be protected from anymore. Typically, imports. So, what to do? The union will only give so much because they have votes. The company is looking for solutions. The shareholders are demanding action. The locals are demanding everything be made happy, happy again.

All of this runs into a brick wall at some point and if a $30,000 GM product isn't as good as a $30,000 Toyota and has double the labor and benefit costs, no one has figured out how to make us consumers buy the GM anyway, though they do try. Recently by just giving them our money.

HD seems to be looking for solutions short of government takeover.

What do you think needs to happen? Charge more for $25,000 motorcycles? Tax credits?

:popcorn:
 

ImnoMensa

New Member
It's simply capitalism by a multi-national, publicly held corporation. Don't act like you support American maufaturing jobs now. That ship left the dock years ago. God forbid our giant government would regulate corporations who are outsourcing jobs overseas. That would be way too socialistic. Hell, that would verge on communism.

Obviously in order to put those Harley's together in India it wil take some sort of Assembly line.

After that Assembly line is built, How long will it take Harley to figure out that it is just as cheap to ship Harleys to Europe and the Netherlands from India as it is to ship them from the US to those places, and that the labor to build them in India is much cheaper than here.
Before long the India plant grows and ours shrinks, Before long we will be importing Harley's built in India to the good old USA.

Not saying that is the plan now (although I suspect it has been thought of), but what if. It's not like something like this has never happened before with other products.
 

Sparx

New Member
Obviously in order to put those Harley's together in India it wil take some sort of Assembly line.

After that Assembly line is built, How long will it take Harley to figure out that it is just as cheap to ship Harleys to Europe and the Netherlands from India as it is to ship them from the US to those places, and that the labor to build them in India is much cheaper than here.
Before long the India plant grows and ours shrinks, Before long we will be importing Harley's built in India to the good old USA.

Not saying that is the plan now (although I suspect it has been thought of), but what if. It's not like something like this has never happened before with other products.

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. That's pure capitalism.
 

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
While labor costs may be a factor, in these cases it's about gaining access to a market. Same reason your "Japanese" car is bult from parts made all over the globe and assembled somewhere in the US.
If the motorcylce is assembled in India it probably isn't taxed as much as a fully assmebled import would be.

Japanese cars are assembled here because a complete car is taxed at a much higher rate than a box of parts. They're also assembled in southern states that have "right-to-work" laws that minimize the affect unions have on the final cost.
 

FromTexas

This Space for Rent
Not intervention, just tell us the truth. American jobs are going to India, and he's going there to announce it.

As it is India just allowed Harley to be sold in their country two or three years ago. Harley's don't meet their stringent clean air laws, but under Bush we made a trade agreement that we would buy x tons of mangoes a year from India (lifting an 18 year old Trade Embargo), if they allowed Harley to sell x amount of bikes a year. India waived their clean air requirements for Harley to sell there, and we now have Mangoes in the US year round.

Mangoes for Harleys



So now he takes the work Bush has done and takes it to the next liberal level (which has become the norm)

AND the parts for Harley aren't all made here. A lot of Harley parts (depending on the model Harley) are built in Europe.. SO send the parts from Europe to India, put the bikes together then ship them to the US.

What next liberal step? Competive business and cost control is a capitalist step. The liberal step would be taxing them on their profits in India to help prevent union jobs from being exported and creating laws that x number of jobs must be performed by a depressed economic classes in America.
 

FromTexas

This Space for Rent
Obviously in order to put those Harley's together in India it wil take some sort of Assembly line.

After that Assembly line is built, How long will it take Harley to figure out that it is just as cheap to ship Harleys to Europe and the Netherlands from India as it is to ship them from the US to those places, and that the labor to build them in India is much cheaper than here.
Before long the India plant grows and ours shrinks, Before long we will be importing Harley's built in India to the good old USA.

Not saying that is the plan now (although I suspect it has been thought of), but what if. It's not like something like this has never happened before with other products.

And what if it becomes the plan? Why shouldn't Harley behave like a corporation? Since Harley has to worry about perception due to them being an "American" brand with a specific community, I doubt they would ever ship it all overseas because there would be a consumer impact, but if they choose to reduce cost because American manufacturing labor has priced themselves out of competition, why can't they?

You either believe in economic freedom or you don't. The consumer will be the ultimate arbiter in the end -- spending with companies they agree with on product and image.

Jobs could be kept here with less government intervention - don't raise taxes on the companies, don't make costly healthcare mandates, don't empower bad union behavior, etc...
 

FromTexas

This Space for Rent
Japanese cars are assembled here because a complete car is taxed at a much higher rate than a box of parts. They're also assembled in southern states that have "right-to-work" laws that minimize the affect unions have on the final cost.

Excellent point - novel concept, isn't it? They do the same thing here (manufacture a final product) and try to control cost.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
Probably. Harley announces they will send kits to india for the motorcycles to be put together there.

News | Harley-Davidson USA

Now this doesn't mean they will ship harley davidson's they build in India here to the USA.

Not right away .

But it does mean that India will assemble Harley Davidson's built from parts supplied by the factory, in India.

Now any way you look at it that means some people who put them together here will lose the assembly portion of that job, and that India will use cheap labor to put them together in India.

Now if we look into the future we can see that perhaps it will be so much cheaper that Harley will start importing them here and even later they may start building the parts there. Does that sound about right? Or am I imagining things.

Is this why Obama is taking 400 CEO's to India?

I don't believe in coincidence. Tata Motors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Tata Motors Ltd (NSE: TATAMOTORS, BSE: 500570, NYSE: TTM) is a multinational corporation headquartered in Mumbai, India. Part of the Tata Group, it was formerly known as TELCO (TATA Engineering and Locomotive Company).

Tata Motors is India’s largest automobile company, with consolidated revenues of USD 20 billion in 2009-10. It is the leader in commercial vehicles and among the top three in passenger vehicles. Tata Motors has winning products in the compact, midsize car and utility vehicle segments. The company is the world's fourth largest truck manufacturer, the world's second largest bus manufacturer, and employs 24,000 workers. Since first rolled out in 1954, Tata Motors has produced and sold over 4 million vehicles in India.[1]

Established in 1945, when the company began manufacturing locomotives, the company manufactured its first commercial vehicle in 1954 in a collaboration with Daimler-Benz AG, which ended in 1969.[2] Tata Motors is a dual-listed company traded on both the Bombay Stock Exchange, as well as on the New York Stock Exchange. Tata Motors in 2005, was ranked among the top 10 corporations in India with an annual revenue exceeding INR 320 billion. In 2010, Tata Motors surpassed Reliance to win the coveted title of 'India's most valuable brand' in a annual survey conducted by Brand Finance and The Economic Times. [3]

Tata Motors has auto manufacturing and assembly plants in Jamshedpur, Pantnagar, Lucknow, Ahmedabad, Sanand and Pune in India, as well as in Argentina, South Africa and Thailand."
 
Top