I hate Nancy Pelosi

[This_person]

But you are fine when Trump changes many many many years of precedent by not giving up his business interests, not sharing his tax returns,

Stop being a hypocrite.

Actually, I'm against ANY presidential candidate providing their tax returns.

I believe Mr. Trump follows all the laws with respect to his businesses, as well. Did Mr. Obama stop selling books? Did Mr. Bush put 100% of his funds into a blind trust? Did Mr. Clinton put 100% of his finds into a blind trust?

No.

So, the hypocrite is the one concerned about the business dealings of one president when not concerned about the business dealings of other presidents.

He can say whatever he wants, all the polling is against him on this and that isn't going to change from his incoherent rambling.

The singular poll that matters is the electoral college vote. He won that one pretty well. I strongly suspect he will win the next one.

 

[Gilligan]

I was commenting on the fact that his wealth came from his father yet you fools believe he is a " very stable genius" when he has done nothing more than rely on his fathers name to license and sell.d

You specialize in being wrong, don't you?

But speaking of wealthy....how did Pelosi end up so incredibly rich?...how did Feinstein?

 

[Sapidus]

Actually, I'm against ANY presidential candidate providing their tax returns.

I believe Mr. Trump follows all the laws with respect to his businesses, as well. Did Mr. Obama stop selling books? Did Mr. Bush put 100% of his funds into a blind trust? Did Mr. Clinton put 100% of his finds into a blind trust?

No.

So, the hypocrite is the one concerned about the business dealings of one president when not concerned about the business dealings of other presidents.



The singular poll that matters is the electoral college vote. He won that one pretty well. I strongly suspect he will win the next one.

So what? No one cares what your personal opinion on taxes is.

However to be ethically consistent you would say that Trump broke a long standing precedent of providing them and should do the same.

Otherwise you know what you are doing when you say Pelosi is breaking a long standing precedent? You are being a hypocrite and most likely sexist.

 

[Sapidus]

You specialize in being wrong, don't you?

But speaking of wealthy....how did Pelosi end up so incredibly rich?...how did Feinstein?

Most of her wealth comes from her husband . As usual. What is your point?

 

[vraiblonde]

you do understand with Sapidus 'old people die and get out of my way vibe'

I don't have a problem with that part. The young dumbasses are the ones who'll have to live with their ignorance and poor choices, not me. When they're in government tenements, standing in line for food while the police supervise, I'll be dead by then. The only thing they can hope for is that their children rebel against them and put this country back together again. Otherwise they're looking at living in every other Socialist environment throughout history.

People like Stupidus, right now, are begging for what the Cubans jumped on boats to flee. And that is some ####ed up chit right there.

 

[This_person]

But who is "they" that is suppose to ask "their father"? Trump and Trump's father, who would actually be Donald Trump's grandfather? Why does sapsmear hate his grandfather too?

The line was an attempt at "let them eat cake" from Pelosi, attributing it to Trump.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says President Trump doesn't understand financial insecurity that federal workers face during the shutdown: "He thinks maybe they could just ask their father for more money. But they can’t”

Trump never said it, and Pelosi was trying to smear Trump with a line that Trump never even came close to uttering.

Remember, Pelosi is the one that said $1,000 bonus is "crumbs"

“And that’s the thing, you [middle class] get this little thing and we [corporate ‘fat cats’] get this big bonanza. You get the crumb, we get the banquet.”

This, from the same woman who believes a $40 tax cut, when provided by Democrats, is a good thing, but that tax cuts provided by Republicans will kill people.

“160 million Americans will continue to receive their payroll tax cut — nearly $40 per paycheck in the pockets of the average family. I salute the work of the unified House Democratic caucus on behalf of the American people."

When asked "...isn’t really what’s going on is that many people are getting a very modest tax cut and some people are getting a tax increase while a lot of this is also going to business but it’s not the end of the world?" Pelosi responded, "No, it is the end of the world. This—Health care, the debate on health care is life-death. This is Armageddon. This is a very big deal. Because you know why? There is really a very hard way to come back from this. They take us further, more deeply, into debt. What can you do but raise taxes?

So, when she wants to try and slam Trump for getting a loan from his father, and imputing on him the believe workers could do the same, she was really just being an ass. Sappy loved it, of course.

 

[This_person]

So what? No one cares what your personal opinion on taxes is.

Then why do you keep - INACCURATELY - telling me what my opinion is?

Pick a side, Sap.

However to be ethically consistent you would say that Trump broke a long standing precedent of providing them and should do the same.

That's a precedent I believe needed ending.

Otherwise you know what you are doing when you say Pelosi is breaking a long standing precedent? You are being a hypocrite and most likely sexist.

I'm saying I see no need to end that precedent. I don't find the precedent necessarily wrong. It's up to the president how he does it, not the Speaker. It's right there in Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution.

However, your comment about sexism is worse than laughable. I do not support Speaker Pelosi due to her opinions and actions, not her sex. I fully believe the two sexes are equals, and each have good and bad people in them. She just happens to be a bad one, having nothing to do with her reproductive organs.

 

[vraiblonde]

Having said that, I think Pelosi is completely out of line and will look very bad coming out of this.

See Stupidus' posts. Her blind faithful are cheering her on on social media - this morning you couldn't avoid seeing them because they were in every thread. Watch CNN and MSNBC - they are crowing that she sure showed their mortal enemy (that would be the President of the United States that they consider their enemy, btw).

If Trump declared martial law and directed our military to round the Dems up and throw them in the pit, that wouldn't hurt my feelings at all. They are trying to stage a coup, overthrow our government, and thwart the will of the People. That is treason and our Constitution spells out a punishment for that.

 

[frequentflier]

Only because she is the most effective democractic leader in years. She is good at getting her way and raising money and keeping her party in line. If she were a man you would say how tough she is and what a good legislator she is. She also put Trump in his place repeatedly in the last few weeks which was hilarious to watch. "He thinks maybe they could just ask their father for more money," Pelosi said. "But they can't."



Instead just like with Hillary you have allowed republicans to manipulate you through propaganda into thinking she is the devil incarnate.

Just wait soon you idiots will be claiming she molests children in a non exist basement in a pizza parlor.

You really don't know much about Vrai if you think she can be manipulated in any way, shape or form.

 

[Gilligan]

Most of her wealth comes from her husband . As usual. What is your point?

So she and he should get rid of it, according to you. Right?

 

[Gilligan]

and most likely sexist.

There you go again.

 

[Gilligan]

Poor Nancy....


https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/07/nancy-pelosi-wealth-liberal-hypocrisy/

 

[vraiblonde]

Poor Nancy....


https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/07/nancy-pelosi-wealth-liberal-hypocrisy/

Oh please. Her idiot fan club doesn't care about that. You can show them these things until you keel over from exhaustion, and they'll stare at you blank eyed and drooling, and go, "Errrm...orange man bad....sexist....racist...errrrm..." They are a mindless cult and you don't deprogram cultists with facts and logic.

 

[vraiblonde]

You really don't know much about Vrai if you think she can be manipulated in any way, shape or form.

That moron doesn't know anything but what his handlers tell him to say.

 

[Sapidus]

That moron doesn't know anything but what his handlers tell him to say.

She has proven repeatedly she is a foaming at the mouth lunatic.

She claims not to watch Fox news and then this morning says she saw something on Fox.

She wishes her political opponents and people who disagree with her political views death.

She is the the type of moron who would happily shut down the government and expect people to work without pay because it would some how stick it to liberals.


She is in fact eh exact easily manipulated prone to emotionally outbursts with no facts that Trump and co rely on

 

[Gilligan]

She has proven repeatedly she is a foaming at the mouth lunatic.

She claims not to watch Fox news and then this morning says she saw something on Fox.

She wishes her political opponents and people who disagree with her political views death.

She is the the type of moron who would happily shut down the government and expect people to work without pay because it would some how stick it to liberals.


She is in fact eh exact easily manipulated prone to emotionally outbursts with no facts that Trump and co rely on

 

[Sapidus]

See Stupidus' posts. Her blind faithful are cheering her on on social media - this morning you couldn't avoid seeing them because they were in every thread. Watch CNN and MSNBC - they are crowing that she sure showed their mortal enemy (that would be the President of the United States that they consider their enemy, btw).

If Trump declared martial law and directed our military to round the Dems up and throw them in the pit, that wouldn't hurt my feelings at all. They are trying to stage a coup, overthrow our government, and thwart the will of the People. That is treason and our Constitution spells out a punishment for that.

Just read the above and tell me if this is a sane person. She is saying all democrats should be killed because Trump iis trying to hold the government hostage to bend to his wishes despite less than half of the country supporting funding the border wall.

And yet she thinks the people opposing this hostile attempt at dictatorship are the ones to blame. This is exactly the same type of cult of personality thinking that led to Nazi Germany. And yet she claims to be a free thinker and a patriot

Someone needs to watch this woman before she shoots up the trailer park

 

[This_person]

That moron doesn't know anything but what his handlers tell him to say.

I did find it pretty funny when he said you'd be cowering under your bed holding your Bible.

 

[Gilligan]

This is exactly the same type of cult of personality thinking that led to Nazi Germany.

Whew!...you are truly a master at the irony stuff, shortbus.

 

[Sapidus]

Then why do you keep - INACCURATELY - telling me what my opinion is?

Pick a side, Sap.



That's a precedent I believe needed ending.



I'm saying I see no need to end that precedent. I don't find the precedent necessarily wrong. It's up to the president how he does it, not the Speaker. It's right there in Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution.

However, your comment about sexism is worse than laughable. I do not support Speaker Pelosi due to her opinions and actions, not her sex. I fully believe the two sexes are equals, and each have good and bad people in them. She just happens to be a bad one, having nothing to do with her reproductive organs.

If you weren't such a tool you would have read the Pelosi quote where she said he could feel free to deliver it in writing.

Instead you just got your hackles up despite agreeing with her overall message.

See how easy you are to manipulate?