PsyOps
Pixelated
You, of course, understand that it IS the job of the FBI to investigate the backgrounds of all nominees for appointment to high public office?
Which they have already done...................... 6 TIMES YOU POS!
You, of course, understand that it IS the job of the FBI to investigate the backgrounds of all nominees for appointment to high public office?
What is the alternative? How do you suggest she is brought to justice?
How about she took it to the police right after it happened ....
Through regular means. We already have laws against slander and libel, and a mechanism to prosecute them. Most people in the public eye don't go that route because it's tedious and time consuming, but they should. There needs to be a strong punishment for defaming someone, and the media needs to be included in that punishment because they perpetuate and encourage it. They destroy someone publicly, with no evidence, and throw a "my bad" in there when it's proven false, after the damage is done and cannot be undone.
If it were up to me, I'd put her head on a pike. Send a message.
As it stands, she will never be punished and in fact she will be rewarded with speaking engagement and book deals.
I have a great answer for that................. How about she took it to the police right after it happened, instead of waiting 35 years, when the perp is being considered for the highest court in the land?
You and your leftist buddies are the only ones that WANT this to be true. Yes, I said it... you WANT it to be true, when you know damn-well this whole things is a democrat stall tactic and complete fabricated bull####.
maybe because she was 15, and some place she wasn't supposed to be
If you are going to continue to live in your own reality and ignore everything I have said on the subject I am just going to ignore you. If you want to continue debat8ng this issue with me, read and respond to my posts and stop making up idiotic bull####.
Which is why the whole thing and all claims like it should be thrown away immediately.I have a great answer for that................. How about she took it to the police right after it happened, instead of waiting 35 years, when the perp is being considered for the highest court in the land?
You and your leftist buddies are the only ones that WANT this to be true. Yes, I said it... you WANT it to be true, when you know damn-well this whole things is a democrat stall tactic and complete fabricated bull####.
I call it as I see it. Calling for an investigation on something that happened 35 years ago, and the so-called victim remembers just about everything is just stupid. What the hell is the FBI supposed to do with NOTHING?
Wanting an investigation means you're giving credibility to her accusation, when there is none, which means you believe her.
If she doesn’t make her claims under oath I don’t think they are going to make any charges stick.
This should be investigated because it is a serious accusation.
God damn you are stupid. I am going to give you one last chance to debate me rather than the voices in your head.
This should be investigated because it is a serious accusation. If she is lying she should be prosecuted. The FBI or MSP have plenty of time to interview the 6-8 people they would need to. Then you have a hearing on Monday and hold a vote.
Attempted rape. She even threw in ‘could have killed me’ :shrug:This is a real question:
What is she accusing him of? Specifically?
But the damage is already done, and you and I both know that that was the whole point of the accusation. There is nothing they can do to Kavanaugh legally - the whole idea was to smear him, stir up the screaming SJWs, promote (more) hatred of Trump, and delay the hearing until after the election they think they are going to win. There was absolutely no other reason for this woman to "come forward" at this point in time.
Which they have already done...................... 6 TIMES YOU POS!
They haven't actually hung anything on him, so the answer is: until they do.
Duh.
Attempted rape. She even threw in ‘could have killed me’ :shrug:
"She has been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats.
“She’s not prepared to talk with them at a hearing on Monday,”
i have only read or heard the one account which has remained fairly consistent.i already linked to the version I have heard. where are you getting your news?But what *specifically* is she claiming he did? "Attempted rape" is an extremely ambiguous charge. And what precisely did he do that made her think he could have killed her?
There are several different stories being reported, all supposedly coming from her directly. I'm curious which one you've heard and think she's talking about.