6 year olds carrying anti-abortion signs

[MMDad]

Incorrect. If by "your book" you are referring to the Bible - which by the way I did not write I just read and try to heed. Jesus taught us to judge actions justly. John chapter 7 verse 24. If you don't have a Bible you can use one online. We are however taught not to condemn and I am not condemning anyone. What do you think I am condeming you for?

There are actions that do harm to others which are wrong no matter who does them. It is object not subjective.
You are free to stand in front of my home and denounce christianity. I would gladly talk with you.

You illeterate, ignorant, .... Never mind, i don't have to sink to your level. Don't excuse your ignorance by denying the bible. Also, don't presume to justify your actions by quoting one verse. True believers live by the whole of the bible, rather than picking the ones that suit their objectives.

Nobody ever said they would stand in front of your house and denounce Christianity, they just said they would denounce your beliefs. If you really read the New Testament, instead of listening to propoganda, you would know the difference.

 

[kingpl2]

I thought the phrase "eye for an eye" appeared in the good book.

Well if by the good book you mean the Bible You are Correct !! Yes an eye for an eye is taught in the old testament. Even there it was meant as temperance because what was actually happening ( and for that matter still is happening today with Jews and arabs) was when someone killed someone's brother in retaliation they would then go kill that guys whole family, in counter retaliation his relatives would go wipe out an entire village -only escalation.. The meaning was to be temperate in your response..BUT THAT WAS OLD TESTAMENT now in the new testament Jesus who is the fulfillment of the old law teaches that an eye for an eye only leaves everyone blind and toothless and that the heart of the law is mercy, turning the other cheek.

 

[kingpl2]

You illeterate, ignorant, .... Never mind, i don't have to sink to your level. Don't excuse your ignorance by denying the bible. Also, don't presume to justify your actions by quoting one verse. True believers live by the whole of the bible, rather than picking the ones that suit their objectives.

Nobody ever said they would stand in front of your house and denounce Christianity, they just said they would denounce your beliefs. If you really read the New Testament, instead of listening to propoganda, you would know the difference.

I guess when all else fails just call people names huh? Too bad name calling won't really make one's heart joyful. I live by more than just the whole Bible it is a subset of the Truth albeit a major portion. Please quote me anywhere they Bible says to not judge. and perhaps you did not see the message but the author did say protest in front of my home to "denounce christianity"

 

[kingpl2]

The children that are gone are gone. We can do nothing for them. The children that are living are the topic of discussion. If you want to discuss abortion, then you may as well jump on the daisy chain.

Correction the children who are gone we can do something for - memorialize them. That is what the cross display on Rt 235 at IHM is doing.

 

[kingpl2]

But who created that? If you create you thus have the right, also to destroy.

This is not true. Gomez V Perez. After you read the case you will understand why Roe V Wade was decided after this case, even though it was before it on the supreme courts docket. It take a man's sperm fertilizing a womens egg to "make" a human being. God is still the creator we only procreate. to create is to make something from nothing we anything physical we only make.

 

[BuddyLee]

This is not true. Gomez V Perez. After you read the case you will understand why Roe V Wade was decided after this case, even though it was before it on the supreme courts docket. It take a man's sperm fertilizing a womens egg to "make" a human being. God is still the creator we only procreate. to create is to make something from nothing we anything physical we only make.

Therefore two people 'create' something.

God is still the creator

Prove it.

 

[kingpl2]

Why is it necessary for you to feel you have the right to show that kind of thing to MY child?

The signs were necessary to start this discussion and stop the innocent from being killed by someone else's choice.

 

[kingpl2]

Therefore two people 'create' something.

Prove it.

you are a creature, hence there must have been a creator

 

[BuddyLee]

you are a creature, hence there must have been a creator

Yea, my parents.

 

[kingpl2]

Yea, my parents.

Carry this to the Nth degree and we have an infinity of evidence

 

[BuddyLee]

Carry this to the Nth degree and we have an infinity of evidence

Sure, if you believe in the whales belly story among others.

 

[MMDad]

I guess when all else fails just call people names huh? Too bad name calling won't really make one's heart joyful. I live by more than just the whole Bible it is a subset of the Truth albeit a major portion. Please quote me anywhere they Bible says to not judge. and perhaps you did not see the message but the author did say protest in front of my home to "denounce christianity"

Now I understand! The Bible is a subset of the truth! You are a Mormon!

 

[meme]

I'm still trying to figure out how this got turned into an abortion debate???

 

[MMDad]

I'm still trying to figure out how this got turned into an abortion debate???

Because the radicals are not able to debate anything but abortion. The rest of us have been trying to debate whether or not we should be allowed to be parents.

 

[kingpl2]

Now I understand! The Bible is a subset of the truth! You are a Mormon!

I am not a mormon. Another incorrect conclusion jumped to. The Bible contains enough but not all which by the way it does say in the Bible.

 

[meme]

Because the radicals are not able to debate anything but abortion. The rest of us have been trying to debate whether or not we should be allowed to be parents.

That's exactly what I thought.

 

[MMDad]

I am not a mormon. Another incorrect conclusion jumped to. The Bible contains enough but not all which by the way it does say in the Bible.

If you are not a Mormon, but you still believe that the Bible is not complete, what do you believe?

 

[kingpl2]

Because the radicals are not able to debate anything but abortion. The rest of us have been trying to debate whether or not we should be allowed to be parents.

no one is telling you how to parent, conversly this thread was started with a statement about how I parent, what I should do or not do in others eyes (kids holding signs on 235)..who is saying you shouldn't be allowed to be parents?

 

[kingpl2]

If you are not a Mormon, but you still believe that the Bible is not complete, what do you believe?

What do I believe about what? 9please be specific so I can be specific...I belief what is handed down to me from Jesus the God who became man. I don't decide right and wrong God does I just pass it on for the good of all.

 

[meme]

I'll tell you what I need...A or a :martini: