A "Well Regulated Militia" .....

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Miami, a lot of people with no combat experience.

Keep in mind..a remarkable number of Civil War soldiers (particularly Northern) had, in effect, "no combat experience" . Many spent most if not all of the war bivouacked or long marching. So it wouldn't be unusual for a soldier to have fired his piece for the first time at an enemy target in battle even though he'd been in uniform for a long time.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Keep in mind..a remarkable number of Civil War soldiers (particularly Northern) had, in effect, "no combat experience" . Many spent most if not all of the war bivouacked or long marching. So it wouldn't be unusual for a soldier to have fired his piece for the first time at an enemy target in battle even though he'd been in uniform for a long time.

That's them starched collar pussies in the Army of the Pot-o-mac. The MEN of the Army of the Tennessee and the boys in gray weren't strangers to firearms.
 

mAlice

professional daydreamer
Keep in mind..a remarkable number of Civil War soldiers (particularly Northern) had, in effect, "no combat experience" . Many spent most if not all of the war bivouacked or long marching. So it wouldn't be unusual for a soldier to have fired his piece for the first time at an enemy target in battle even though he'd been in uniform for a long time.

I would also think (could be wrong) that they wouldn't be practicing like we do today, either. I would think that ammo was at a premium in such lean times.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
That's them starched collar pussies in the Army of the Pot-o-mac. The MEN of the Army of the Tennessee and the boys in gray weren't strangers to firearms.

Harumph harumph.hear hear!....I'm sure my GG uncles and GG grandfather from Alabammy were proficient with arms.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I would also think (could be wrong) that they wouldn't be practicing like we do today, either. I would think that ammo was at a premium in such lean times.

I only add this. That certainly ammo was expensive and at a premium, and the guns were a pain in the ass to load.
I know when I shot black powder I was careful to take good aim and hit what I aimed at because of the pain in the butt of reloading.

Back when cops had revolvers they aimed. Today they have Glocks and other semi automatics with an excess of bullets so they spray.
Keep pulling the trigger in the general direction and hope for a hit.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I would also think (could be wrong) that they wouldn't be practicing like we do today, either. I would think that ammo was at a premium in such lean times.

The Northern Armies were, if anything, over-equipped in many cases, as their timid commanders avoided contact with the southern forces and continually demanded more and more equipment and supplies. But how much actual "range time" they got?..I honestly don't know.

In the southern armies....everything was scarce to begin with, and only got scarcer as the War of Northern Aggression dragged on.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Back when cops had revolvers they aimed. Today they have Glocks and other semi automatics with an excess of bullets so they spray.
Keep pulling the trigger in the general direction and hope for a hit.

? That certainly does not resemble anything in the training I've received over the years.
 

mAlice

professional daydreamer
I only add this. That certainly ammo was expensive and at a premium, and the guns were a pain in the ass to load.
I know when I shot black powder I was careful to take good aim and hit what I aimed at because of the pain in the butt of reloading.

Back when cops had revolvers they aimed. Today they have Glocks and other semi automatics with an excess of bullets so they spray.
Keep pulling the trigger in the general direction and hope for a hit.

Didn't they have bullets during the civil war? Are you maybe thinking Revolutionary War?
 

mAlice

professional daydreamer
The Northern Armies were, if anything, over-equipped in many cases, as their timid commanders avoided contact with the southern forces and continually demanded more and more equipment and supplies. But how much actual "range time" they got?..I honestly don't know.

In the southern armies....everything was scarce to begin with, and only got scarcer as the War of Northern Aggression dragged on.

Okay. That makes sense to me. I guess I hadn't really thought about it in those terms. I kinda' relate to the south more than the north.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Didn't they have bullets during the civil war? Are you maybe thinking Revolutionary War?

The vast majority of infantry rifles were still muzzle-loaders during the Civil War. But you are correct in the that breech-loading rifles and cartridges to fit them were used by some. Cavalry, in particular, were usually the first to receive those more modern rifles.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The vast majority of infantry rifles were still muzzle-loaders during the Civil War. But you are correct in the that breech-loading rifles and cartridges to fit them were used by some. Cavalry, in particular, were usually the first to receive those more modern rifles.



Spencer Rifle was demonstrated for Lincoln on the White House Lawn


Burnside Rifle
Henry Yellowboy
 

glhs837

Power with Control
That's them starched collar pussies in the Army of the Pot-o-mac. The MEN of the Army of the Tennessee and the boys in gray weren't strangers to firearms.

Being familiar with firearms and being used to firing it at human beings are a bit different.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
The vast majority of infantry rifles were still muzzle-loaders during the Civil War. But you are correct in the that breech-loading rifles and cartridges to fit them were used by some. Cavalry, in particular, were usually the first to receive those more modern rifles.

That's right. And if I read correctly, your unit was one of the first... :evil:
 
Top