Abortion
- Thread starter Dakota
- Start date
Pre and post birth.
I saw a back & forth on another site. Women want the right to choose if they want to have a baby or not. But they need the male to help. The argument was over if a woman became pregnant and wanted an abortion, the father had no say in the decision. It was her choice. But if the woman decided to have the child she expects the father to help support it even if he wanted her to abort it. The males are saying if the woman made the choice to have the baby its on her if the father said to abort it. The women want it both ways.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
There are so many ways to stop having children why do they depend on abortion.?
Get their tubes tied. use the pill. Close their legs, make the male use a condom.
Abortion is for rape, kids too young to know better, a fetus with a problem, and idiots.
Yes they can make a mistake---Once., Maybe twice, but at some time or other a decision needs to be made about a better form of Birth Control.
Get their tubes tied. use the pill. Close their legs, make the male use a condom.
Abortion is for rape, kids too young to know better, a fetus with a problem, and idiots.
Yes they can make a mistake---Once., Maybe twice, but at some time or other a decision needs to be made about a better form of Birth Control.
black dog
Free America
Seems so easy for a man to avoid, don't bust up in there.
Problem solved.
This page has some good information on what the States have and what they may have in regard to Roe v Wade going away - https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy
Now the most restrictive laws I have seen are the heartbeat law states (basically if the heartbeat can be detected then no abortion, some have exceptions for specific instances). But even that archaic restriction leaves 6 weeks from conception to detection. If there is an outright ban can someone point me to the state law?
As of now this is all farce and BS about total bans. From what information is out there one would think that if a sweet lil" thing didn't want a baby they could get tested up to 4 weeks after copulation and make their medical decision well before it became a legal issue. And from what I can see all these laws do is put the onus back on that sweet lil' thing to keep her life in order or her thighs together.
Now the most restrictive laws I have seen are the heartbeat law states (basically if the heartbeat can be detected then no abortion, some have exceptions for specific instances). But even that archaic restriction leaves 6 weeks from conception to detection. If there is an outright ban can someone point me to the state law?
As of now this is all farce and BS about total bans. From what information is out there one would think that if a sweet lil" thing didn't want a baby they could get tested up to 4 weeks after copulation and make their medical decision well before it became a legal issue. And from what I can see all these laws do is put the onus back on that sweet lil' thing to keep her life in order or her thighs together.
Or use the balloon knot.
LightRoasted
If I may ...
black dog
Free America
It was never an inconvenience to me, only knocked up one.I'm glad not everyone sees a pregnancy as an inconvenience that needs to go away. In less than three months and I'll have a new fishing buddy.
Control ones seed and its not an inconvenience.
Why do some care what others do with pregnancy...
black dog
Free America
You guys and your canoe trips.
Way to early, won’t be able to keep the momentum up. Plus joe will do something to screw the pooch and the media will go there.
‘Women In My State…Are Going To Die’
“As attorney general, I have statewide jurisdiction,” Nessel began. “And I ran on a platform of understanding that likely during the course of my term, Roe v. Wade would be overturned. And this incredibly draconian and strict 1931 law would criminalize abortion in this state with virtually no exceptions – no exception for rape, for incest, no exception for medical emergencies. And understanding that the lives of our 2.2 million women who are of childbearing age in this state, their lives would be at risk. I refuse to enforce this draconian law that will endanger their lives and put in jeopardy the health, safety and welfare of the lives of each and every woman in the state of Michigan.”
Nessel told Todd that the law does not make exceptions for medical emergencies, but Politico reported in April: “The Michigan law bans abortion at any stage of pregnancy, with an exception for the health of a woman but not for cases of rape or incest.” [emphasis added]
Todd then asked about a particular provision in the law banning the sale of abortifacient drugs. Nessel claimed that the law would not only punish abortion and abortion medication providers, but also the women who get them: “we’re talking about not just throwing providers and anybody who works with a provider, under aiding and abetting theories, in prison, but also women themselves, who procured abortion through abortion medication,” she said.
It’s ‘Disrespectful’ To Not Allow Women To Have Abortions
After claiming that it was the “politics” of the Supreme Court that had changed, Pelosi said that when Democrats held majorities in both chambers of Congress as recently as 2009, they were “not” a “pro-choice” party.
“This is about something so serious and so personal and so disrespectful of women,” she said. “Here we are on Mother’s Day, a week where the court has slapped women in the face in terms of disrespect for their judgments about the size and timing of their families. So, the fact is, let’s keep our eye on the ball. The ball is in the court of those justices.”
“The enshrinement of Roe v. Wade into the law is the way in order to protect a woman’s right to choose,” Pelosi later added. “But this year, either for the enshrinement of Roe v. Wade, or you’re not. It’s the law of the land.”
mitzi
Well-Known Member
I'm glad not everyone sees a pregnancy as an inconvenience that needs to go away. In less than three months and I'll have a new fishing buddy.
Congratulations!