Kinnakeet
Well-Known Member
Only a handful voted for him the first time
Ah Yes ... Acceptance of Gays - Next Pedo's or Incest
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
The handful that did the counting put him in the White House.
The New York Post ran a story yesterday headlined, “Target Loses $9B in Week Following Boycott Calls Over LGBTQ-Friendly Kids Clothing.”Well that was fast!
The story broke early this week. Targets across the nation had been stocked and decorated preparing for so-called “Target Pride Month,” which is the store’s month-long gala, not just accepting but celebrating and encouraging atypical sexual behavior. But Target’s Pride Month activities annoyed lots of its customers, who’d just gotten over the retailer’s last woke-splosion: its attempt two years two to force shoppers into genderless bathrooms, giving ladies no option but sharing their intimate personal spaces with hairy, bearded, voyeuristic fat men wearing colorful strappy dresses and sandals.
Although it’s only been about a week, and although Target took some items offline and moved some store merchandise around in southern states, Target’s sales have plunged, and its stock has plummeted about $9B in total value.
You know, it used to be kind of difficult to get conservatives on board for boycotts, for a host of reasons, but — like a Clydesdale-led miracle — the phony Anheuser-Busch beer company and its hypomanic spokesman-slash-girl seem to have taught our folks how to do it.
It wasn’t so much that Target was pushing atypical, gay sexual choices on everybody. True, that’s pretty annoying, because most of us don’t feel like having divergent mating practices shoved in our faces while we’re shopping for a new toaster oven. But that wasn’t the real problem. The real problem was Target aiming the gay progaganda at children, and for promoting Target’s newest spokesman, the Lord of Evil, the Great Serpent: Satan.
I’m going to carefully explain all this, even though I think no explanation is necessary, but for the people who still aren’t sure what Target did wrong.
Number one, kids don’t need to know about gay sex. Period. Nobody needs rainbow-colored onesies, pajamas, or swim diapers. A dispute arose about whether Target was actually selling youth-sized swimsuits labeled “tuck-friendly,” or whether they were just for adults. But that argument misses the point. Whether the items were in the kids’ section to start with, or were kept in the adult section marked “extra-small,” alert moms — whose protective instincts are set on ‘high’ — knew exactly what Target was really up to.
Activists will argue that kids SHOULD be groomed into accepting other gay kids, so that the gay kids will feel accepted and not suicidal. It’s a dumb argument, a manipulative emotional soundbite, but we don’t have to argue about that. Even if it were true: THAT IS NOT TARGET’S JOB.
Stay away from the kids, Target! (And anyway, it’s NOT true.)
A second problem for a lot of people was the Satanism. You don’t have to be religious to understand the problem, and I’ll tackle it from a secular perspective. But obviously, Christians will always have a pretty big problem with anything that celebrates the Prince of Lies, the destroyer of life, the literal manifestation of evil, whose own original sin, not coincidentally, was “Pride,” because he equated himself with the Most High.
Before about ten minutes ago, when our Judeo-Christian culture apparently shot past its expiration date, being linked to Satan in any way was career suicide.
But nowadays, according to Target and its newest designer Abpallen, Satan loves trans people.
The Abprallen designs, sold in Target stores, conflate LGBTQ with Satanism
Forget about the Christians versus the atheists. The Satanists offer a third way: they’re not ‘worshipping’ Satan, not exactly, they’re only going through the motions because they want to show everyone how silly they think ALL religions are. All religions except, of course, their own non-religion religious tradition. It’s a NEW kind of Satanism, not that old blood-drinking, orgy holding, child-sacrificing kind. It’s a “Neo-Satanism.”
Neo-Satanism’s devil-may-care followers say they are proudly anti-religious, or if you will, proudly irreligious. Proudly blasphemous, in other words. And gay.
It guess it IS a cult, after all
But does this this silly excuse that Neo-Satanism is a “non-religion” make any sense? Even if they’re not being deceitful; even if they really DO offer a secular, logic-driven, intellectual, atheistic alternative to religion, if still doesn’t work. If that were true, why would they pick the most despised, most hated and feared symbol in human history as the name for their non-religion?
First, think about it this way: If it would be crazy to name your brand-new secular religion after that devil Adolph Hitler, why is it less crazy to pick literal Satan?
In other words, regardless of whether the Devil exists or not, why align themselves with everything that Satan REPRESENTS?
In other words, ’Satan’ comes with baggage, thousands of years’ worth of baggage, baggage in the form of near-infinite awful imagery, the worst possible P.R., and don’t forget, he is completely triggering for Christians, Muslims, and even agnostics and ‘white witches.’ The Neo-Satanist project to ‘reimagine’ Satan as a free-thinking role model is lunacy, a Sisyphean task if ever there were one.
So, why take on all that baggage? And, why would they confusingly recycle the name of an existing religion, the religion of devil worship, instead of coming up with a new name for their new non-religion? Why not just name their atheist non-religion after Charles Darwin or Albert Einstein or something? And … they sure use a lot of religious imagery for a strictly science-based group.
Unsurprisingly, Neo-Satanic themes encourage violence. The guillotine is a reference to the Antichrist who, according to the Bible, in the Last Days will behead folks who refuse to take the Mark of the Beast. A lovely image! But not science.
Only two alternatives make any sense. Either Neo-Satanists are lying — and they WOULD lie, wouldn’t they? — and they really are just dollied-up regular Satanists who do worship Evil, or they are deliberately triggering believers, on purpose, to make some kind of a point, and are not actually peacefully minding their own business like they claim they are.
Satan is not harmless. Not even if he’s only a concept. Satan is not cute. Satan is an insidious viper, hated and despised by billions, who has fully earned being chained in infinite darkness for 1,000 years following which he will be unceremoniously chucked into a lake of fire.
Most sane people, religious or not, don’t want retailers of cheap, mass-manufactured, Chinese products peddling Satan to their kids as a goofy cartoon figure.
☕️ PHOBIA PHOBIC ☙ Friday, May 26, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Neo-Satanist retailer Target loses $9B in equity after wokeness; DeSantis raises $8m in 24 hrs; DOJ drops same charges against woke US Attorney but not Trump; trans puppy goes to men's jail; and more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Well, they say the law evolves, and this new defense is a terrific example of the magnificent progress of the law as the universe bends toward justice. The Daily Mail UK ran a story a couple weeks ago headlined, “Trans Woman Is Cleared of Flashing Her Penis at Ohio YMCA After Judge Ruled She’s Too FAT for Her Genitals to Be Visible.”Haha, “her penis.” Hers. They’re killing me. It hurts so much to laugh this hard.
Darren Glines, aka “Rachel,” aka Jabba the Hut, was charged by police with three counts of indecent exposure at a YMCA in Xenia, Ohio, by throwing his weight around the YMCA girl’s locker room, naked, in front of young girls, bending over to pick up his dropped towel. Over and over.
Do not try to imagine the scene. I warned you.
Darren is intact, maybe more than intact, but what I mean to say is, he has not had any gender surgeries. He is ‘au naturel,’ as the French would say.
Unfortunate YMCA employee Kateisha Young testified at Darren’s trial. She told the court that she was forced to get a restraining order against Darren after he sexually assaulted her. (With respect for the suffering of the parties, the pronouns in the Daily Mail article are hilariously all mixed up.) Kateisha testified that Darren had grabbed her by the genitals while the two were at a local coffee shop. After the assault, up until she got the restraining order against him, Darren would come by the YMCA and hang around whenever Kateisha was working.
Despite the credible sexual assault claim, the judge still ultimately found Darren WAS not guilty of indecent exposure. The judge’s reasoning is somewhat unique. He found Darren not guilty of exposing himself to the girls because Darren’s lawyers successfully argued that his disgusting, hanging fat rolls fully covered his genitals, like a floppy skin suit.
Darren can barely find the little guy himself.
Judge David McNamee admitted that “there is no question that Glines was in the women’s locker room.” But, the judge explained, “Quite simply, the facts do not exist to support a finding of guilt, as charges. Glines’ genitalia was not visible as a result of other portions of [his] body covering same.” (The judge said ‘her.’ I edited it for accuracy.)
Mr. Glines’ lawyer must have been very persuasive. Presumably, Darren did not actually demonstrate his skin suit’s cloaking features for the judge ‘in vivo,’ as it were. But apparently, the parts that were visible were enough to satisfy everyone that the morbidly obese Defendant had ample body parts laying around to cover up wee willie.
So there you have it: sex offenders’ newest defense. Five years ago, Darren would have been on the sex offender registry at this point in the story. Nowadays, he’s just as much of a victim as are his actual victims. He’s a victim of odious discrimination, a victim of a fat-phobic, trans-phobic, just-plain-phobic society that deliberately misunderstands specially-sized people who were unfortunately also trapped in the wrong bodies by the improvident Hand of Fate.
Or … maybe Darren is just another overweight, unattractive, cross-dressing Peeping Tom, who’s taking advantage of trans mania to get his kicks in by ogling women and girls in the changing room at the Y. Which one do YOU think it could be?
☕️ PHOBIA PHOBIC ☙ Friday, May 26, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Neo-Satanist retailer Target loses $9B in equity after wokeness; DeSantis raises $8m in 24 hrs; DOJ drops same charges against woke US Attorney but not Trump; trans puppy goes to men's jail; and more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
You Can't Escape the Pride Cult Even When You're Trying to Learn Another Language
But there’s one really annoying thing about it — beyond the fact that the app will hound you to death with notifications as if you have nothing better to do with your life than sit there and do language exercises — and that’s the proliferation of exercises on the app and website that subtly bring in gay and lesbian subtexts.
Here’s an example: on Saturday morning, I did a speaking lesson. The way those work is that you have 10 sentences that you have to listen to and speak back. Duolingo has these cartoon characters (which are politically correct enough that one of them wears a burka) that you encounter throughout your journey on the app or website, and they’re the ones to speak what you must speak back.
In this particular lesson, two of the exercises had male characters talking about “mi novio” (my boyfriend). Another male character spoke about “mi esposo” (my husband), while a female character said something about “mi esposa” (my wife). If you’re keeping score, that’s four out of 10 exercises dealing with same-sex relationships.
Lest you think that this is some special phenomenon for Pride Month Advent, I’ve noticed several gay and lesbian exercises throughout my time using the app. While none of the characters are explicitly gay in and of themselves — though I have my doubts about one of them — many of the characters will blurt out a sentence about a same-sex relationship from time to time.
black dog
Free America
Along with those that spend innate amounts of time surfing the internet for more things that spin them up...
Target marketing VP holds senior position at org pushing secretive transgender policies in K-12 schools
A Target Corporation senior executive in the marketing department maintains a position with a controversial K-12 advocacy organization called GLSEN – Target's Pride Month partner – which is focused on integrating gender ideology at all levels of K-12 schools, from curriculum to district policy.
Carlos Saavedra is a vice president of brand marketing at Target and a treasurer at GLSEN. GLSEN focuses on getting districts to adopt policies that will keep parents in the dark on their child's in-school gender transition, providing sexually explicit books to schools for free, and integrating gender ideology at all levels of curriculum in public schools.
Target and Saavedra did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
"GLSEN leads the movement in creating affirming... and anti-racist spaces for LGBTQIA+ students. We are proud of 10+ years of collaboration with GLSEN and continue to support their mission," Target said. The retail giant provides annual donations to GLSEN, which has amounted to at least $2.1 million.
Uganda Passes 'Anti-Gay' Law, Western NGOs and Governments Threaten Sanctions
While many cultures worldwide are incompatible with LGBTQ+++™ ideology, what makes Uganda stand out is that, while other countries will bend over backward for “foreign aid” (which is usually just a bribe to coerce the government into adopting whatever fashionable social engineering or economic program the World Bank/UNESCO/World Health Organization want), Uganda is putting all of theirs on the line.
In fact, the technocrats are already threatening to revoke it:
The Western corporate state media is none too pleased to see that, in at least one jurisdiction, its nonstop LGBTQ+++™ social engineering has failed to produce the intended results. Uganda, in their view, should be swimming in transgenders by this point. Instead, the country’s leadership (with popular support, based on polling) appears to be pushing the culture in the opposite direction.
Review Of ‘The Little Mermaid’ Laments Lack Of ‘Kink’ In Kids Movie
“The new, live-action ‘The Little Mermaid’ is everything nobody should want in a movie: dutiful and defensive, yet desperate for approval,” Morris wrote in his review.
“It reeks of obligation and noble intentions. Joy, fun, mystery, risk, flavor, kink — they’re missing,” he continued.
People immediately noticed that Morris chose to use the word “kink” for a PG-rated movie that was advertised for children and families. While the word has multiple meanings, it’s frequently used in pop culture to refer to offbeat sexual preferences.
“The New York Times just put up a review of the Little Mermaid where the reviewer complains that KINK was missing from the film. The definition of kink: a person’s unusual sexual preferences. Same media denies the left sexualizes kids. The reviewer needs his hard drives reviewed,” conservative social media influencer Robby Starbuck wrote on Twitter.
