Anyone watching Meet the Press?

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

Yeah, and hopefully the insurgents are on the same timetable, huh?

Or we can just keep the timetable amongst the coalition and the Iraqi PM so the insurgents don't know what this timetable offers.

"Stay the course" wasn't a strategy. If we "stay the course," we'll be there for another 30 years with the same casulaties every day we have today.

 

[vraiblonde]

Or we can just keep the timetable amongst the coalition and the Iraqi PM so the insurgents don't know what this timetable offers.

OMG!!!



Could you BE any more naive?????

How old are you??????

 

[Pete]

OMG!!!



Could you BE any more naive?????

How old are you??????

I believe there are 18 years of sage experience and life lessons stacked up behind him.

 

[PsyOps]

And that there doesn't count as an attack. You're saying I and many others on the "left" perfer voting for idiots. My political opinion doesn't matter? Everybody on the "left" is just stupid so don't pay any attention to what they say, they're idiots?

Andy... Those were not my words, those were Tom Sawyer's words. But you are correct, this was the same form of attack. I don't subscribe to this form of dialog in any form. I stand corrected. But, consider two wrongs don't... well you know.

 

[PsyOps]

And that there doesn't count as an attack. You're saying I and many others on the "left" perfer voting for idiots. My political opinion doesn't matter? Everybody on the "left" is just stupid so don't pay any attention to what they say, they're idiots?

Andy... I just realized you posted this quote "Democrats dont mind voting for idiots and even seem to prefer them..." and attached my name to it as though I wrote it. That was completely disingenuous and a flat out lie. Why would you do this? This just proves my point, all-the-more, the left's lack of substance and ability to stay with the facts.

 

[PsyOps]

The typical GOP talking point is "Democrats havern't offered any solutions on Iraq."

Well, in fact, they have. I do believe the "timetable" strategy was the Democrats' idea.

It may be a talking point but it is fact-based.

Why don't you outline this timetable, in detail, for us?

 

[PsyOps]

"Stay the course" wasn't a strategy. If we "stay the course," we'll be there for another 30 years with the same casulaties every day we have today.

You mean sort of like we were in Europe for... oh gee, we are still there. Can you explain this?

 

[chernmax]

........................

 

[Lenny]

Or we can just keep the timetable amongst the coalition and the Iraqi PM so the insurgents don't know what this timetable offers.

"Stay the course" wasn't a strategy. If we "stay the course," we'll be there for another 30 years with the same casulaties every day we have today.

You know, for a schmuck whose only argument is that Bush cannot read or write, you can't spell worth a ####z! Go back and spell check your last fifteen posts, then come back with a meaningful 'Yeah, butt.'

 

[Lenny]

Andy... I just realized you posted this quote "Democrats dont mind voting for idiots and even seem to prefer them..." and attached my name to it as though I wrote it. That was completely disingenuous and a flat out lie. Why would you do this? This just proves my point, all-the-more, the left's lack of substance and ability to stay with the facts.

No, he absolutely did not! He said "perfer" (the great speller and interpreter of whether our president can read or write)

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

No, he absolutely did not! He said "perfer" (the great speller and interpreter of whether our president can read or write)

I also note in my signature I'm not a great speller, so deal with it! At least I am willing to admit my faults. What about yours? Just another Republican.

And um yeah Iake a mistake in attatching names. Anyways, I was attacking "TomSawyer."

And where would any Republican get off talking aqbout misquoting people and what not?

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

You know, for a schmuck whose only argument is that Bush cannot read or write, you can't spell worth a ####z! Go back and spell check your last fifteen posts, then come back with a meaningful 'Yeah, butt.'

Once more, read my signature before making an attack. I REALIZE that, dick.

Is it acceptable to think Democrats are stupid and Republicans are the higher god? It's just typical average partisan attacks.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

You mean sort of like we were in Europe for... oh gee, we are still there. Can you explain this?

We're not still fighting a war in Europe. We're not losing dozens of troops a month in combat operations in Europe.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

You are entitled to your opinion.

Is it yours or the DNC's I doubt any true democrat really has an opinion of their own. I know their politicians dont, They just vote lockstep for whatever the party tells them to do.

The only one who sems to have his own opinion is Lieberman and look what they did to him.

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

You are entitled to your opinion.

Is it yours or the DNC's I doubt any true democrat really has an opinion of their own. I know their politicians dont, They just vote lockstep for whatever the party tells them to do.

The only one who sems to have his own opinion is Lieberman and look what they did to him.

And the Republicans don't? As for it being my opinion or the DNC, once more I haver no party affiliation.

 

[SamSpade]

We're not still fighting a war in Europe. We're not losing dozens of troops a month in combat operations in Europe.

That's kind of a dumb argument. You expect to lose troops when you're in a war. Losing dozens of troops is what happens in war - except of course, we're managing to lose dozens a month when we were losing dozens a minute in previous wars.

I think liberals just have a hard time believing we're at war. The rationale of leaving because we're losing men is like telling cops not to patrol the streets or firefighters to stop fighting fires, because it's too dangerous. Of course it is. You think that a few weeks of boot camp ought to get that idea in - we train our guys to kill their guys. Death is always tragic, but it's damned stupid to point to deaths in war as a reason NOT to fight it.

The proper time to decide whether or not to commit to battle is BEFORE THE WAR BEGINS. Once you engage, it's kind of like deciding you don't want to be a dad once the kid becomes a toddler - it's just a little too damned late. If you vote to go to war, your focus ought to be on how to WIN the war - not on how to criticize the decision to go in - ESPECIALLY if you voted FOR it.

What I want to hear from the Democrats is a plan to WIN THIS WAR - not on how to just get the hell out and let the chips fall where they may. They share some of the blame for getting us in, because a lot of them voted for it. For those who have died already, the greatest thing they can do is honor their deaths by finding a way to WIN. That's why I can't respect their position. They don't want to win; they just want to be sure that our soldiers aren't being shot at. No long range regional goals; no plan on global terror. Just run like hell. Or run slowly.

It's still surrender by any other name.

 

[Benjismom]

I watched the debate. I even kind of like Michael Steele but these last couple of years, this administration, this forum, I wouldn't vote Republican if my life depended on it. And I don't believe Dubya when he tells me it does.

 

[chernmax]

......................

 

[chernmax]

I watched the debate. I even kind of like Michael Steele but these last couple of years, this administration, this forum, I wouldn't vote Republican if my life depended on it. And I don't believe Dubya when he tells me it does.

I say, strip them of party and vote for the best person. I can't stand political parties and people who will blindly vote for someone because of his affiliation verse best for the job to represent Maryland!!! US!!!

 

[AndyMarquisLIVE]

I watched the debate. I even kind of like Michael Steele but these last couple of years, this administration, this forum, I wouldn't vote Republican if my life depended on it. And I don't believe Dubya when he tells me it does.

See, I would vote Republican if a candidate is worthy. Michael Steele is worthy. He is not in the President's pocket. If you watched the debate, you'd realize he was against the handling of this war and against Rummy.