Biden's America Last Program
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Vermont... shocker!
Judge Rules The Navy Can Discriminate by Skin Color
A judge ruled that the US Navy can keep racial preferences. Marxist DEI is alive and well in the Navy. Meritocracy is dead if this isn’t overturned.
Donald Trump and his Cabinet can’t get into office soon enough.
US Senior District Judge Richard D. Bennett of Maryland on Friday allowed the US Naval Academy to keep considering applicants’ race and ethnicity in its admission practices, calling the issue a matter of national security.
Usually, meritocracy is the best way to protect national security. We should have the best candidates in our Navy.
The group challenging DEI is Students for Fair Admissions.
Students for Fair Admissions had prevailed in similar challenges last year to Harvard and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. But the group’s effort to force a change at the Naval Academy, Bennett wrote, “has FAILED.”
For now.
Merrick Garland Is The Worst Attorney General In American History
I was surprised when I first saw this article from MSNBC and CNN contributor Dean Obeidallah declaring Garland to be “America’s Worst Attorney General.” Had it finally dawned on someone in our corporate press that smearing parents as “domestic terrorists” and prosecuting political opponents of no less stature than a president might have been a bad idea? (No, it hadn’t.)
The failure for which Garland deserves infamy, according to Obeidallah, was not trying hard enough to throw his boss’s presidential opponent in prison. For that insufficient zeal, he says Garland is “the biggest failure of an attorney general in our lifetimes.”
Raiding a Former President’s Home
One of the most outrageous moments of those prosecutions was the FBI’s “unannounced” 9-hour raid on the Trumps’ personal home at Mar-a-Lago, in which around 30 agents who were authorized to use “deadly force” descended on the residence and dug through everything from Mrs. Trump’s closet to the president’s safe. A few days later, Garland admitted he had “personally approved” the raid. Two years later, Smith’s team admitted to tampering with the evidence they seized from Mar-a-Lago.Covering for Biden’s Classified Docs Scandal
At the same time Smith was trying to throw Trump in prison for misuse of documents, Garland’s DOJ helped Joe Biden get away with the improper retention of classified records. When records from Biden’s tenure as vice president were found in his garage and at the Penn Biden Center, the FBI played nice. Not only were none of Biden’s residences raided, but the FBI let Biden’s attorneys go through the documents first without agency supervision. A special counsel selected by Garland to investigate Biden declined to charge him because he was a sympathetic “elderly man with a poor memory” whom it would be difficult to convince a jury had committed a crime that “requires a mental state of willfulness.”Ignoring a Congressional Subpoena …
When Robert Hur declined to prosecute Biden for his likely crimes involving classified documents, his reasoning — combined with Biden’s public exhibition of dementia symptoms — increased concerns about the mental capacities of the man ostensibly running the country. Facing demands to release the audio tapes from Hur’s interviews with Biden, Garland refused to make them public to the American people. Even when Congress issued a subpoena to Garland for the audio, he ignored it.… While Imprisoning Trump Officials for Ignoring Subpoenas
Meanwhile, the Garland DOJ successfully sought jail time for Trump officials Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon for refusing to answer congressional subpoenas. Announcing Bannon’s indictment, Garland crowed that the charges “reflect the department’s steadfast commitment” to the “rule of law.”When the House of Representatives voted to hold Garland in contempt of Congress for ignoring his subpoena, however, Garland’s own Justice Department “quickly said it would not prosecute Garland for contempt,” as Axios reported at the time without a hint of irony.
Before Biden, the biggest group pardon by any president was Obama’s, when he pardoned 330 people on one day in 2017. Yesterday the AP ran a story headlined, “Biden commutes roughly 1,500 sentences and pardons 39 people in biggest single-day act of clemency.” They were probably all good friends, too.
It was Biden’s second record-setting pardon. The first was the breadth and scope of Hunter’s pardon, which was arguably the broadest pardon in history, competing with Ford’s pardon of former president Richard Nixon. Biden had also promised he would never ever pardon Hunter, because no one is above the law, but then blamed changing his mind on the country’s politicized justice system. But that is a side issue.
The bottom line: get ready for lots more record-breaking Biden pardons. To prepare yourself, just imagine the shocking kind of pardons that could be excreted by a president lacking moral or ethical guardrails, who can’t think clearly, and who doesn’t care about the optics, historical precedent, or whether it hurts his political party. The hopeful thought is, why would Biden bother pardoning Fauci? I mean, what’s in it for Biden?
Whatever happens, it will probably be stomach-turning. But the silver lining is all these record-setting, eye-watering Biden pardons will nicely tee up Trump’s pardons. Biden just set the new bar, pardoning fifteen hundred fellow criminals in one day.
How many J6ers remain in jail?
☕️ 1500 PARDON ST. ☙ Thursday, December 12, 2024 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Trump declares Wray's quitting a Great Day for America; Biden sets record number of one-day pardons; Mangione maybe not so smart; FDA pauses Moderna mRNA trial; daily mystery drone update; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Josh Hawley: Democrat Plan Is Amnesty for 13M Illegals to Flood Workforce
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this week, Hawley blasted a Democrat witness for his pro-amnesty position despite the majority of Americans supporting deportations.
“Why would you want American citizens and those who are here lawfully to have to compete against illegal immigrants?” Hawley asked the witness.
“You don’t actually care about working people because you’re hellbent on this ideological agenda of opening our border. You want to everyone here a path to citizenship — you want blanket amnesty. You talk about ‘mass deportation’ … you want mass amnesty … 13 million people, you want to dump into the labor force,” Hawley continued:
Biden Takes Credit for Syria Regime Change He Tried to Prevent
There are lots of mostly bad things that President Joe Biden can justly take credit for, but the fall of Syria is not one of them. The only real reason this happened is because Israel threw off the shackles and decided to go after Hezbollah after a year of terror. And Biden did everything to prevent that.
At the very end, he used an arms embargo to force Israel into a fake "ceasefire" with Hezbollah. But by then Israel had done enough damage to Hezbollah that Turkey's Jihadists were able to just roll into Syria, and Iran decided to sell them out and pull back.
But now Biden is trying to take credit.
Biden delivered a mumbling teleprompter speech that looked like an Arab Spring leftover, calling it "a moment of historic opportunity for the long-suffering people of Syria to build a better future for their proud country," and promised that "the United States will work with our partners and the stakeholders in Syria to help them seize an opportunity to manage the risk."
And promised more "humanitarian relief."
Mostly, though, Joe tried to take credit.
"You know, for years, the main backers of Assad have been Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia. But over the last week, their support collapsed — all three of them — because all three of them are far weaker today than they were when I took office," Biden mumbled. "The upshot for all this is, for the first time ever, neither Russia nor Iran nor Hezbollah could defend this abhorrent regime in Syria. And this is a direct result of the blows that Ukraine, Israel have delivered upon their own self-defense with unflagging support of the United States."
Obama Floats Pardon “Trial Balloon” Amid Deep State Frenzy to Get on the List
By Jerome R. CorsiWhen does Barack Obama ask Susan Rice to petition Joe Biden for a presidential pardon for himself? With the pardon frenzy buzzing around the Biden camp, a trial balloon for an Obama pardon has already begun drifting toward the Oval Office.
Biden will be well advised to limit his pardons to members of his own family. In his NBC News Meet the Press interview on Sunday, December 8, Trump explained that he had no intention of appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Joe Biden, despite Biden’s enthusiasm to raid Mar-a-Lago under the authority of Jack Smith, the special prosecutor the Biden administration appointed in an attempt to convict and incarcerate Trump in federal criminal prison.
Nevertheless, given the resistance coup d’état that the Deep State has waged against Donald J. Trump since before the first inauguration on January 20, 2017, the fear and loathing among Biden administration top-level operatives to beg for pardons attests to their awareness that the second Trump administration will witness justice administered by a righteous Trump Vindictus [i.e., translated from Latin: Trump’s Revenge]. Those petitioning now for pardons are doing so because they know the crimes they have committed, and they are afraid that with the massive declassification of information that the incoming Trump administration is planning to make public, their guilt will no longer remain hidden.
What Obama fears is that Biden might be persuaded to issue a sweeping set of Deep State pardons to a list that would include various top-level Obama administration officials like former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and former Attorney General James Comey who potentially could be forced to provide damaging criminal testimony against him.
A presidential pardon does not waive a person’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for future crimes. But a person accepting a pardon (including Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Hunter Biden, or anyone else so pardoned) can be forced to testify truthfully about the pardoned crimes since they are no longer at risk of prosecution under federal law. Once pardoned, the Fifth Amendment privilege does not apply to giving testimony against others for the pardoned crimes since the pardoned individual no longer needs Fifth Amendment protection from a self-incrimination risk that is no longer relevant.
In other words, just to be clear, please understand that by accepting a pardon, a person has admitted guilt to the pardoned crime, a precedent the Supreme Court established in 1915’s Burdick v. United States. This fact, without any other evidence, gives the DOJ and the FBI a probative cause to start a new investigation by interviewing and interrogating the pardoned person under oath. All a DOJ or FBI official would have to do is to put a piece of paper in front of the pardoned person and ask that person to enumerate all crimes committed, plus requiring the pardoned person to give the names and details of all criminal accomplices involved.
President Gerald Ford set the precedent for a pre-emptive pardon (i.e., a pardon before any offense has been charged) with his Proclamation 4311, issued on September 8, 1974, granting a pardon to his predecessor, Richard Nixon, who resigned in disgrace, ending the Watergate affair, on August 9, 1974. Ford justified the pre-emptive pardon because Nixon’s trial “could not fairly begin until a year or more has elapsed.” Ford reasoned that in that time, “the tranquility to which this nation has been restored by the events of recent weeks could be irreparably lost by the prospects of bringing to trial a former President of the United States.”
But the idea of granting a long list of Deep State political actors a blanket pardon for all crimes they may have committed, plotted to commit, or contemplated to commit, reaching back to 2009, the year Obama first took office, would stretch the precedent of the Nixon pardon back 15 years, to politically unacceptable levels encompassing all the years of Democratic presidential rule since President George W. Bush. The tranquility Ford sought to preserve by the Nixon pardon is not compatible with the angry, vituperative response a blanket pardon of Obama/Biden operatives may have committed, especially if Hillary and Bill Clinton blanket pardons were to be thrown into the mix.
A four-year-old Law Stack Exchange note argued that “(p)roactively pardoning large swaths of current and former government officials, family members and other people connected to the Trump administration would be a double-edged sword” because “it may also amount to admitting that the Trump administration was essentially a criminal organization.”
Biden COMMUTES Chinese Man With 47,000 CHILD IMAGES, SHOCKING Pardon Sparks DISGUST And Rage
Biden COMMUTES Chinese Man With 47,000 CHILD IMAGES, SHOCKING Pardon Sparks DISGUST And Rage
BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO FIGHT BACK - https://castbrew.com/Become a Member For Uncensored Videos - https://timcast.com/join-us/Hang Out With Tim Pool & Crew L...
www.youtube.com