Mikeinsmd said:True. They threaten to run to Canada when the right wins the presidency.![]()
Right again (pardon the pun)![]()
![]()
Tonio, you're on an accurate roll today ma boy!!![]()
![]()

Mikeinsmd said:True. They threaten to run to Canada when the right wins the presidency.![]()
Right again (pardon the pun)![]()
![]()
Tonio, you're on an accurate roll today ma boy!!![]()
![]()
Absolutely! But it still was not the correct thing to do. We didn't have a bunch of interment camps for Germans. The Japanese were singled out because they looked different.Nickel said:Yes, America was wrong to put the Japanese in internment camps, just like we were wrong to accuse so many of being affiliated with the Communist party. But at the end of the day, those Japanese were still alive. Millions of Poles and Jews ceased to exist after the war. DO NOT compare apples to oranges here. There is a difference between stupidity and genocide.
Well, to be fair, the Germans never directly attacked us. But you do have a good point.2ndAmendment said:We didn't have a bunch of interment camps for Germans. The Japanese were singled out because they looked different.
Well, it was my understanding that it was in retaliation for the attack on Pearl Harbor, and they were put there under the guise of protecting them from society, when in fact it was just pure racism. But for Vrai to say "I always found it ironic that, while railing against Hitler's treatment of Jews, FDR was rounding up Japanese Americans and carting them off to internment camps." would be like me saying "I always found it ironic that while scoffing at Jeffrey Dahmer for eating all those people, coronors continue to perform autopsies.". By comparing what FDR did to what Hitler did, it belittles the impact the Holocaust should have on society.2ndAmendment said:Absolutely! But it still was not the correct thing to do. We didn't have a bunch of interment camps for Germans. The Japanese were singled out because they looked different.
Nickel said:Yes, America was wrong to put the Japanese in internment camps, just like we were wrong to accuse so many of being affiliated with the Communist party. But at the end of the day, those Japanese were still alive. Millions of Poles and Jews ceased to exist after the war. DO NOT compare apples to oranges here. There is a difference between stupidity and genocide.
Mikeinsmd said:AND we were at war with Japan.
Gracias! That makes perfect sense. I should have thought of it myself actually since it's so simple.ylexot said:Yes, a gun will leave unique marks on the casing. However, the "fingerprint" can easily be altered. If you think it's easy to change a semi-auto into full (as you mentioned in the other gun thread), changing the fingerprint would be cake. Also, the "fingerprint" changes naturally with time. Fire a couple hundred rounds through the gun (some people shoot hundreds per month) and the action of the gun will deform the parts that cause the "fingerprint". Thus, they are useless as the system is set up. Bullet and casing fingerprinting can be useful in linking crimes together or linking crimes to a gun afterwards (assuming the gun is not modified after the crime), but having the database with casings from the manufacturer is a waste of time, money, and effort.
Only the extremist like to call him Hitler, but they call every conservative Hitler. It's actually ridiculous because I wouldn't really call Hitler a conservative.vraiblonde said:Well, to be fair, the Germans never directly attacked us. But you do have a good point.
George Bush gets called "Hitler" for the Iraq stuff - notice none of his critics ever call him "FDR" for instituting Homeland Security?
vraiblonde said:Well, to be fair, the Germans never directly attacked us. But you do have a good point.
Bustem' Down said:I believe they were attacking US shipping to England.
Well yeah, of course. Never heard of german troops in the US though. I'll have to look that up.Triggerfish said:Submarine war was an attack on not just shipping to the UK but also the Soviet Union since the U.S. was supplying them with airplanes and other weapons.
Bustem' Down said:I remember something about Germany being in contact with Mexico trying to convince them to invade the Southwest US to draw us out of Europe. I can't remember if that was WWII or The Great War (WWI).
Bustem' Down said:Well yeah, of course. Never heard of german troops in the US though. I'll have to look that up.
That's right, it was WWI. Probably would have worked too. For a little while at least.Triggerfish said:That was the Zimmerman telegraph. The Germans offered to give Mexico back what it lost in the Mexican War if it entered WWI on the side of the Germans and attacked the U.S. The U.S. was officially neutral at the time.
This along with the sinking of the Lusitania were the primary reasons that the U.S. entered WWI.
An interesting read!Triggerfish said:Shortly after midnight on the morning of June 13, 1942, four men landed on a beach near Amagansett, Long Island, New York, from a German submarine, clad in German uniforms and bringing ashore enough explosives, primers, and incendiaries to support an expected two-year career in the sabotage of American defense-related production. On June 17, 1942, a similar group landed on Ponte Vedra Beach, near Jacksonville, Florida, equipped for a similar career of industrial disruption.
For the whole story.
http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq114-2.htm