Out of the self-selected group of rich people who wanted to leave, crime was the biggest issue (because they are rich, so cost isn't an issue).Poll: A Third of Seattle Residents Are Considering Leaving, Citing Crime and Costs
Public safety is the top concern among respondents who make more than $250,000 a year. Higher earners are also more likely to own a home than rent, the survey found.
Out of the respondents who report wanting to move, 80 percent rate the city poorly as a place to live, and 66 percent report feeling unsafe in their neighborhood.
“In comparison, among the two-thirds of Seattleites who did not consider leaving, 88 percent rated the city as an excellent place to live and 72 percent said they felt safe in their own neighborhood,” according to the report. “Notably, the majority of respondents citing housing costs as a major reason for wanting to move out rated Seattle as an excellent place to live, indicating their reluctance to leave if not for affordability.”
The Times noted that in the last three years, costs in the city’s metro area increased 20 percent. The city’s metro area home price index is also 40 percent higher than in 2018, down from 50 percent in 2022, and wages have not kept up with the increases, according to the report.
If someone voted for this madness, they should be made to stay an suffer the consequences of their choice and clean up the mess
On Dec. 20, 2019, workers at Anchor Brewing Company, a venerable Bay Area icon that brewed its first beer for thirsty San Franciscans nearly four decades before the Golden Gate Bridge was built, gathered in the brewery to ratify their first-ever collective bargaining agreement. It was a union contract years in the making — the product of methodical organizing that began in 2018, followed by a contentious public drive and negotiations that spanned the entire 2019 calendar…
That workers at Anchor had successfully organized a union, won their drive and election, and ratified a contract — and did it all without getting summarily laid off or unceremoniously abandoned for a cheaper labor market elsewhere — was a signal that it could be done in other craft-oriented businesses.
The raise structure in the contract is staggered, so we got part of our raise this year [2020], and part of it at the beginning of next year [2021]. Then it [will] continue to go up. So I think starting January, [average pay] will have gone up 20 to 25 percent [since the contract went into effect.]
[In a follow-up message, Machel provided more specific figures: The contract provides Anchor’s brewery workers with an across-the-board average raise of 21 percent over three years. For workers at the Public Taps, the bump is 28 percent.]
That stretch across...the entire Nation...I don't see these as contradictory. It's not a national crisis, it's a blue city/state crisis.
California and New York lose $640M of tax revenue to migration, as conservative Florida and Texas see coffers boosted by $23.1BN
- Liberal states California and New York are posting losses of over $600 million in tax revenue due to migration
- The figures published by the IRS highlight how blue states with steep taxes are losing citizens for places like Florida with lower taxes
- As a result, California and New York are actively losing individuals with high income who are moving elsewhere, including some celebrities
I could be mistaken, but I believe Title 26 data isn't released to other agencies until near the end of the calendar year. Then, in typical governmental swiftness, it takes several months to publish. I doubt that 2022 data is available yet; I'd be glad to be mistaken.LOL, this is 2021 data and lots has changed and will continue to change.
I could be mistaken, but I believe Title 26 data isn't released to other agencies until near the end of the calendar year. Then, in typical governmental swiftness, it takes several months to publish. I doubt that 2022 data is available yet; I'd be glad to be mistaken.
I could be mistaken, but I believe Title 26 data isn't released to other agencies until near the end of the calendar year. Then, in typical governmental swiftness, it takes several months to publish. I doubt that 2022 data is available yet; I'd be glad to be mistaken.
I just remember years ago, looking at data WE publish, and wondering - why isn't THIS year's data published. Then a smack on the forehead and a "duh! because THIS year hasn't ENDED yet!". For most items, it takes a good six months or more to process all of it and publish. Meaning, a year's worth of data doesn't become available until considerably AFTER the year ends. Worse, when it's tax data, because the IRS has to release it to other agencies. So there's always a delay.
No using FACTS and commonsense in the discussion ......
Sorry - assumed you meant the data presented was *old* when in all likelihood, it is the "newest" data available.That is precisely what I stated.
Sorry - assumed you meant the data presented was *old* when in all likelihood, it is the "newest" data available.