Yesterday ABC 7 Washington ran an unfortunately all too common story headlined, “
Shoplifting threatens closure of SE DC grocery store, creating potential food desert.”
Shoplifting threatens to close the store. Remember that line.
I could’ve used any of the many stories from San Francisco, where retailers are fleeing faster than Joe Biden sprinting out of a French Laundry dinner with some Ukrainian oligarchs when a reporter shows up. Walgreens, for one example, has closed half a dozen stores in San Fran, leaving only one highly-abused retail location.
But this DC story gave me everything I needed to expose the media’s latest shell game.
ABC reported on the Giant Food grocery store on Alabama Avenue, which is experiencing 20% inventory shrinkage due to shoplifting, and says it has lost over $500,000 in product this year. If that weren’t enough, Giant Food was recently forced to hire its own security, for some reason, at an annual cost of $300,000. So its DC location is costing over a million dollars more than other locations every year.
It’s pretty hard to raise prices enough to overcome those kinds of additional costs.
Local officials expressed fake concern. Diverse D.C. Councilman Trayon White spoke to Giant’s management after the grocery announced it was considering closing the location, and Councilman White told ABC, “enough is enough.”
Is it though?
ABC followed up by asking DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, hey, what is the plan? The Mayor’s office responded with a stiff, formal statement of word salad with ranch dressing:
"Mayor Bowser continues to lead conversations with a variety of stakeholders across our city to discuss public safety, and more specifically to ask the question of how we can partner to reduce crime and increase conditions so that everyone in our city can thrive,” the mayor’s office told 7News in a statement. “The District is committed to ensuring every resident has safe access to fresh, healthy and affordable food.”
But it’s unclear what precise actions are being taken by the city to ensure grocery stores in Ward 8 will stay in business.
In other words, Mayor Bowser claims she doesn’t know
what to do, and is asking “a variety of stakeholders” for advice. So … if Bowser is baffled, maybe the
stakeholders should be the mayor? Just asking.
ABC, which ultimately was too cowardly to actually name the
real problem, still gets partial credit for including some pretty strong hints in its story. For example, the affiliate reported that it asked the District Attorney about
shoplifting prosecutions:
7News also asked Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano what is he doing to hold shoplifters accountable for stealing merchandise and what is he doing to address this crime trend. More than a month later, Descano still hasn’t answered 7News’ questions.
The District Attorney’s non-answer
was the answer: Descano is doing
nothing about shoplifting prosecution, that’s what. In other words, he’s not prosecuting them, at all.
So let’s go back to our analysis of the media narrative. Look at the headline again:
What causes store closures? Shoplifting does! This is the same way they word all the recent headlines about leftist cities hemorrhaging small businesses because of crime: as though “shoplifting” itself were the problem.
But shoplifting isn’t the root problem. Shoplifting is only a symptom of the problem.
The obvious root problem, hinted at but not named by ABC’s DC affiliate, is that the cops aren’t arresting shoplifters. And why should they, when one man, woke District Attorney Descano, won’t prosecute the ne’er-do-wells. Here’s what the headline
should have said:
Non-Enforcement of Shoplifting threatens closure of SE DC grocery store, creating potential food desert
That honest headline would’ve given away the game, so don’t expect to see anything like that anytime soon. But the loss of retailers is getting a little too obvious, so corporate media is testing out a new narrative: that armies of cunning shoplifters are driving away the hapless, defenseless small businesses.
But …
who is supposed to defend them?
This odious trend began with the “defund police” movement. According to woke theory, black folks are disproportionately arrested for so-called “property crimes,” like shoplifting, and that isn’t fair. So a raft of woke criminal justice reforms were trotted out, like reducing police budgets and eliminating bail. That destructive experiment has now devolved into phase two, where in leftist-controlled areas they simply don’t arrest the criminals anymore. Easy peasy.
For social justice.
But, “food deserts” hurt the whole inner-city neighborhood, which
is mostly black folks. So the woke criminal justice policies are now hurting the people they was supposed to help, just like they always do. And that harm to inner city residents is becoming so undeniable, the media has to shift back to blaming the criminals instead of the the woke officials preventing prosecution of these types of crimes.
This might move them closer towards the real problem, but don’t get your hopes up. Recognizing “shoplifters” doesn’t mean they have any plans to fix the system they broke. There won’t be more arrests. The retailers are on their own, forced to hire private security. And you’d better believe the District Attorney
will vigorously prosecute Giant Food if a shoplifter ever gets hurt when security tries to stop them.
If we had a free media in this country, they’d be running stories about the
real reasons that marxist DA’s are allowing crime to run rampant in Blue cities. Who benefits? The answer is: billionaires benefit, because they can buy up expensive downtown real estate on the cheap as property values plummet, and big delivery-based corporations like Amazon benefit, because they fill in the gaps when smaller businesses are forced to close up shop.
In other words, it’s the literal, textbook definition of fascism.
Articles of impeachment finally filed against Joe Biden; Grandma Garland appoints special prosecutor; Bankman-Fried does not pass go; FDA makes ivermectin admission; extra bad news for Bud; and more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com