None of them have been shot or even shot at. They have been reported to the Border Patrol who often have done nothing about it. Bush apparently does not want Homeland Security or anyone involved. If the feds wanted it stopped, it would stop.Railroad said:because he doesn't want a bunch of ordinary citizens using their own judgement in deciding when and where to shoot people coming across the border. Could it be that he'd prefer our Homeland Security folks get their act together with regard to the Mexican and Canadian borders?
Again, no shooting taking place except with cameras.Lenny said:All we need for the liberals to be reinvigorated is to have a bunch of rednecks gunning down a bunch of wetbacks and posing for pictures next to their field-dressed carcasses hanging from mesquite trees on the border.
Not me. But where they have built walls, the illegals have dug tunnels, so .... Reminds me of the Berlin wall only there, we dug lots of the tunnels.Tonio said:Stupid question--would anyone object to a 50-foot wall along the entire border, with military patrols along it?
if he has'nt relapsed and is into the sauce again he ought to or is he really that chit simple :shrug: :shrug:vraiblonde said:And, PS, Mr. President, you're overstepping your boundaries and creating a dangerous precedent by getting involved in the Terri Schiavo situation.
What the hell has gotten into him????? Wanting to let illegals come waltzing into our country unfettered is supposed to be what Democrats do, not Republicans. I'm trying to figure out his angle on this illegal immigration thing and it's just not coming to me.
vraiblonde said:And, PS, Mr. President, you're overstepping your boundaries and creating a dangerous precedent by getting involved in the Terri Schiavo situation.
What the hell has gotten into him????? Wanting to let illegals come waltzing into our country unfettered is supposed to be what Democrats do, not Republicans. I'm trying to figure out his angle on this illegal immigration thing and it's just not coming to me.
Sparx said:What's gotten into him? It's just a matter of you waking up and seeing the things a majority in 2000 and a SLIGHT minority in 2004, of Americans have been seeing in him for over 4 years.
Sparx said:What's gotten into him? It's just a matter of you waking up and seeing the things a majority in 2000 and a SLIGHT minority in 2004, of Americans have been seeing in him for over 4 years.
You should love him now. I'm sure he said to himself, "Self, Sparx doesn't like me, so I'm going to do a bunch of it doesn't make any sense liberal stuff."Sparx said:What's gotten into him? It's just a matter of you waking up and seeing the things a majority in 2000 and a SLIGHT minority in 2004, of Americans have been seeing in him for over 4 years.
I wasn't thinking of the Minutemen specifically, but I have seen mentions of other groups in Arizona shooting people trying to cross. Don't know if that's accurate. In the case of the Minutemen, I still say INS ought to officially deputize them--they have good intentions.ylexot said:According to the first article I saw about the Minutemen, they are not taking the law into their hands nor are they "gunning down wetbacks". They are just patrolling and reporting illegal border crossers to the Border Patrol (the proper, yet short-handed authority). They even have several private pilots and will be partolling from the air as well...not quite deserving of anyone's ire.
Tonio said:I wasn't thinking of the Minutemen specifically, but I have seen mentions of other groups in Arizona shooting people trying to cross. Don't know if that's accurate. In the case of the Minutemen, I still say INS ought to officially deputize them--they have good intentions.
Then should we go a step higher? Close down the border altogether? Turn the border into a Korea-style DMZ with land mines and barb wire and Army snipers in watchtowers?2ndAmendment said:Not me. But where they have built walls, the illegals have dug tunnels, so .... Reminds me of the Berlin wall only there, we dug lots of the tunnels.
I don't think we want to go there. Of course the Berlin Wall and the East Germany border were set up to keep people from escaping East Germany. Different purpose altogether.Tonio said:Then should we go a step higher? Close down the border altogether? Turn the border into a Korea-style DMZ with land mines and barb wire and Army snipers in watchtowers?
So what we effectively have is a class of people that don't get minimum wage, EITC, etc...a sub-lower class. I'd rather kick them out and get rid of the EITC and minimum wage. I have no problem with immigration and I think the system should be revamped to make it easier to process application. However, I do have a problem with illegal immigration. Should we allow illegal activities if it benfits us? I don't think so.Bruzilla said:I've seen quite a bit of video footage of these guys doing their thing, and they are all armed. While I'm sure they aren't hitting the trails to shoot up an illegals, I'm also sure that it's just a matter of time before someone accidentally shoots someone else.
I think that Bush is opposed to closing the borders because he has a better understanding than most of what would happen if we only allow legal immigrants in. That would mean that all of the positions held by illegals would then be held by legals, who would demand, and receive, higher wages, which would increase the costs of produce and domestic services. Also, while many folks are wanting illegals to pay for the services (schools, police, fire, etc.) that they use by paying income taxes, they fail to realize that 99% of illegals don't work at jobs that pay enough to get them past the earned income tax credit range. So not only would these people not pay any taxes, they would also put a severe drain on the EITC pot.