I'm sure there are relatives of those that made their wealth off of the trading in slaves that are still kicking about and still flying their national flags.
Cheney hunting trip under fire for Confederate flag
- Thread starter Bay_Kat
- Start date
ImnoMensa
New Member
A Confederate flag in New York?? Probably surprised Cheney as much as it did me.
It says it was a small flag and it was in a garage. Big Deal.
Is it racist to say that Al Sharpton earns a living by stirring up crap like this, I dont know, but racist or not ---its fact.
The poor pitiful soul who thinks the Confederate flag is a foreign flag probably doesnt realise that American troops have flown that flag in just about every war this country has been in. He also has a poor grasp of American history and of the War of Northern Aggression.
It says it was a small flag and it was in a garage. Big Deal.
Is it racist to say that Al Sharpton earns a living by stirring up crap like this, I dont know, but racist or not ---its fact.
The poor pitiful soul who thinks the Confederate flag is a foreign flag probably doesnt realise that American troops have flown that flag in just about every war this country has been in. He also has a poor grasp of American history and of the War of Northern Aggression.
Lenny
Lovin' being Texican
Lots of mentions of New York here. Where's the outrage toward the Senator from northern New York state?
Attachments
Dork
Highlander's MPD
I'm getting the same karma as you. Looks like we've got an idiot reading these posts who actually worships Al Sharptongue and thinks we owe him a living. Not a very intelligent person at all.
Dork
Highlander's MPD
Thanks alot Lenny. I was getting ready to eat dinner but now I've lost my appetite. That picture has made me a little nauseous.
R
RadioPatrol
Guest
Larry Gude
Strung Out
Actually...
...the ironic part of this is that New York seriously threatened secession during our Civil War and NYC was the scene of the worst race riots, by far, in our history in fall of 1863 with something like 1,000 blacks murdered over a few day period AND continues to this day to be the home of racial strife (just ask Al) that would make Mississippi blush.
Do we want a President from such a racist place?
60 Miles North of NYC - not exactly Klan territory
...the ironic part of this is that New York seriously threatened secession during our Civil War and NYC was the scene of the worst race riots, by far, in our history in fall of 1863 with something like 1,000 blacks murdered over a few day period AND continues to this day to be the home of racial strife (just ask Al) that would make Mississippi blush.
Do we want a President from such a racist place?
Vince
......
That's for scaring me with that Halloween picture. 
... Or the outrage against the African tribes that hunted them and sold them to slavers. (An African trade practice that is VERY ACTIVE TODAY by the way)
crabcake
But wait, there's more...
Kinda like how he and Jesse Jackson apologized to the Duke lacrosse players for siding with that nappy headed ho hooker and how they apologized for joining in a lynching of 3 innocent white college kids in Durham last year?
Al and his cuckoo croonies can kiss my white ass.
I'm sick of their chit. 
ImnoMensa
New Member
Glory, Glory Hallelujah, Finally someone who say's it like it is.
Tired of all this hateful ,spiteful ,bullchit coming from this racist turd. Sharpton sets race relations back 40 years with his stupid comments.
Some may say your Post is racist, but you cant hold a candle to Al Sharpton when it comes to racism. He makes a living off it.
Tired of all this hateful ,spiteful ,bullchit coming from this racist turd. Sharpton sets race relations back 40 years with his stupid comments.
Some may say your Post is racist, but you cant hold a candle to Al Sharpton when it comes to racism. He makes a living off it.
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
R
Rienell
Guest
It kills me Al and Jesse have such a great opportunity to do good things with their fame and fortune but they have chosen these paths instead.
Sad. Their negative activism (headhunting) has only created more hostility and heightened racism between the races...not improved anything.
Sad. Their negative activism (headhunting) has only created more hostility and heightened racism between the races...not improved anything.
Larry Gude
Strung Out
That's not true...
...they both have exploited opportunity to build wealth and fame. They are capitalist, Americans, at heart.
...they both have exploited opportunity to build wealth and fame. They are capitalist, Americans, at heart.
Does anyone take Al Sharpton seriously anymore? I mean, there was a time when you couldn't get your foot in the political door without making the pilgrimage to Harlem to kiss the ring of Lord Sharpton. But he's gotten so over the top with his crazy accusations that he's eroding support. And since that's how he makes his money - race-baiting and creating racial tensions - you'd think he'd tone it down to keep the faithful onboard.
aps45819
24/7 Single Dad
It's part of the liberal media agenda, po black folks are victims of whitey. That's why Al and Jessie get press and Bill Cosby doesn't
Larry Gude
Strung Out
I think that misses...
..the point. Al Sharpton is a product and, as such, promotion, advertising, perception, is the reality. The more he is on a talk show the more other talk shows want to get him on. Same for TV and print. More is more and more = $
His viewpoints making any kind of sense or validity are NOT the product; his presence is.
Does that make any sense?
..the point. Al Sharpton is a product and, as such, promotion, advertising, perception, is the reality. The more he is on a talk show the more other talk shows want to get him on. Same for TV and print. More is more and more = $
His viewpoints making any kind of sense or validity are NOT the product; his presence is.
Does that make any sense?
JPC sr
James P. Cusick Sr.
Mr. Ferrari
The civil war was far from being "northern aggression" because the south fired the first shots at fort Sumter link HERE and we can find the political reasons for the USA civil war in the words of the rebel leaders.
The American traitor Jefferson Davis spoke his reasons for the civil war as particularly State rights to enforce slavery,
see link HERE and particularly the 8th paragraph.
Text here: ... It has been a conviction of pressing necessity, it has been a belief that we are to be deprived in the Union of the rights which our fathers bequeathed to us, which has brought Mississippi into her present decision. She has heard proclaimed the theory that all men are created free and equal, and this made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions; and the sacred Declaration of Independence has been invoked to maintain the position of the equality of the races. That Declaration of Independence is to be construed by the circumstances and purposes for which it was made. The communities were declaring their independence; the people of those communities were asserting that no man was born--to use the language of Mr. Jefferson--booted and spurred to ride over the rest of mankind; that men were created equal--meaning the men of the political community; that there was no divine right to rule; that no man inherited the right to govern; that there were no classes by which power and place descended to families, but that all stations were equally within the grasp of each member of the body-politic. These were the great principles they announced; these were the purposes for which they made their declaration; these were the ends to which their enunciation was directed. They have no reference to the slave; else, how happened it that among the items of arraignment made against George III was that he endeavored to do just what the North has been endeavoring of late to do--to stir up insurrection among our slaves? Had the Declaration announced that the negroes were free and equal, how was the Prince to be arraigned for stirring up insurrection among them? And how was this to be enumerated among the high crimes which caused the colonies to sever their connection with the mother country? When our Constitution was formed, the same idea was rendered more palpable, for there we find provision made for that very class of persons as property; they were not put upon the footing of equality with white men--not even upon that of paupers and convicts; but, so far as representation was concerned, were discriminated against as a lower caste, only to be represented in the numerical proportion of three fifths. ...
So calling the USA civil war as northern aggression is not true at all.
The civil war was far from being "northern aggression" because the south fired the first shots at fort Sumter link HERE and we can find the political reasons for the USA civil war in the words of the rebel leaders.The American traitor Jefferson Davis spoke his reasons for the civil war as particularly State rights to enforce slavery,
see link HERE and particularly the 8th paragraph.
Text here: ... It has been a conviction of pressing necessity, it has been a belief that we are to be deprived in the Union of the rights which our fathers bequeathed to us, which has brought Mississippi into her present decision. She has heard proclaimed the theory that all men are created free and equal, and this made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions; and the sacred Declaration of Independence has been invoked to maintain the position of the equality of the races. That Declaration of Independence is to be construed by the circumstances and purposes for which it was made. The communities were declaring their independence; the people of those communities were asserting that no man was born--to use the language of Mr. Jefferson--booted and spurred to ride over the rest of mankind; that men were created equal--meaning the men of the political community; that there was no divine right to rule; that no man inherited the right to govern; that there were no classes by which power and place descended to families, but that all stations were equally within the grasp of each member of the body-politic. These were the great principles they announced; these were the purposes for which they made their declaration; these were the ends to which their enunciation was directed. They have no reference to the slave; else, how happened it that among the items of arraignment made against George III was that he endeavored to do just what the North has been endeavoring of late to do--to stir up insurrection among our slaves? Had the Declaration announced that the negroes were free and equal, how was the Prince to be arraigned for stirring up insurrection among them? And how was this to be enumerated among the high crimes which caused the colonies to sever their connection with the mother country? When our Constitution was formed, the same idea was rendered more palpable, for there we find provision made for that very class of persons as property; they were not put upon the footing of equality with white men--not even upon that of paupers and convicts; but, so far as representation was concerned, were discriminated against as a lower caste, only to be represented in the numerical proportion of three fifths. ...
So calling the USA civil war as northern aggression is not true at all.
60 Miles North of NYC - not exactly Klan territory
You'd be surprised. Klan membership in the New England states has been growing gradually along with other fringe groups...