Climate Hypocrisy

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

This Is the Real Reason the Eco-Gorgons Want to Kill Your Dogs and Cats




As if your pale, vegan, demi-gender-in-law wasn't annoying enough when zhe whined about your F-150 tearing apart the clouds, now zhe has another target: your cats and dogs.

Several years ago I noticed obeisant stooges in the Operation Mockingbird media lashing out at how house pets are going to ruin the air we breathe, the soil we farm, and the water we use to wash the scrapple out of our brick BBQ pits.

Check out this climate codswallop from CNN:

Our four-legged friends don’t drive gas-guzzling SUVs or use energy-sucking appliances, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a climate impact. In fact, researchers have showed that pets play a significant role in the climate crisis.....
....Their meat-heavy diet is the biggest contributor to their carbon pawprints, which requires an abundance of energy, land and water to produce. And the production of pet food emits huge amounts of planet-warming gases.

Watch as this mental belly flop from the UK warns Brits (not that they are being replaced by violent Muslims) that their cats are climate killers:

When pets can emit twice the carbon emissions of our homes’ electricity and kill up to 200 million wild prey in the UK every year, we cannot stay silent. Unfortunately, in many cases pet ownership is simply another form of destructive consumerism.

Yes, cats kill a lot of birds. It's what their nature tells them to do. Nature, climate, get it? Suck it, libs!

The truth is, house pets and the food they consume aren't causing hurricanes or boiling the seas, yet Fluffy and Mr. Whiskers have found themselves in the crosshairs of the prairie fairies.

So why that hatred of house pets? Executing Sparky won't save the planet from crumbling like a cookie and whisking us into outer space. It's quite simple, and I should have seen it sooner: communists see dogs as useless eaters and their owners as Western capitalist pigs.

Stanley Coren writes at Psychology Today:

The practice of keeping dogs as pets began to increase in popularity in China during the 20th century. Unfortunately, it met a major setback during the rule of Mao Zedong. In the mid-1960s Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution banned pet dogs, claiming that they were consuming too much of the nation's limited food supplies and were symbols of Western capitalist elites. People who owned pet dogs were publicly shamed, dragged out into the street and forced to watch while their pet was beaten to death.

Mao and his myrmidons saw dogs as a "symbol of decadence and a criminal extravagance at a time of food shortages." The Pekingese were seen as a link to the old Chinese emperors and were almost killed to extinction.

Though China would later relax its pet laws after the Red Guard Revolution, many people recently witnessed the killing of their dogs and cats, allegedly to stop the spread of COVID-19.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member






What is the Labour Party plan when we have a wind drought after backing more & more wind farms?

‘We had to switch on the gas because we had a wind drought.

In 2030-40-50, the wind be similar. The thought wind is going to solve the energy crisis is laughable’

Ed Milliband announced yesterday he is going to expand the use of wind and solar.

Is it no surprise Dale Vince who has made fortunes from wind energy has bankrolled the Labour Party to the tune of at least £5 million?
 

somdwatch

Well-Known Member
TBH when I was in the Netherlands back in the 90s it was a very pedestrian/bike friendly place. I rollerbladed from ship to air station.

It did suck when you hit cobblestone streets tho! 🤣
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Washington Post Accidentally Admits Earth at Coolest Point in the Last 485 Million Years



Norwegian scientists recently did the same thing, comparing global temperatures with carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. The researchers conducted statistical analyses of observed and reconstructed temperature series and tested whether the recent fluctuation in temperatures differs systematically from previous temperature cycles, potentially due to the emission of greenhouse gases.

For example, the researchers gathered all the data from various sources, including those related to the four previous glacial and inter-glacial periods. They did a statistical analysis to see how more recent Global Climate Models (GCMs) compare.

They concluded that there was no way to link man-made carbon dioxide levels to climate change.

[T]he results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.

But I was unprepared for The Washington Post to do the same thing, accidentally admitting that the Earth is at its coolest temperatures in 485 million years.








Granted, the article was intended to push the climate-emergency narrative.


An ambitious effort to understand the Earth’s climate over the past 485 million years has revealed a history of wild shifts and far hotter temperatures than scientists previously realized — offering a reminder of how much change the planet has already endured and a warning about the unprecedented rate of warming caused by humans.
The timeline, published Thursday in the journal Science, is the most rigorous reconstruction of Earth’s past temperatures ever produced, the authors say. Created by combining more than 150,000 pieces of fossil evidence with state-of-the-art climate models, it shows the intimate link between carbon dioxide and global temperatures and reveals that the world was in a much warmer state for most of the history of complex animal life.


But looking at the full picture, I believe people will find it hard to be afraid of global warming, given that the Earth is at historically cold levels.




This graphic reveals a startling truth: mammals have never faced temperatures as cold as what we’re experiencing now. Yet, we’re being told to fear warming? It's time to rethink the narrative. #ClimateCatastrophe #Climate #ClimateScam



Image




The Science article from which The Washington Post takes its information is here for those who wish to review it. Interestingly, one of my early works as a geology student was looking at oxygen isotopes to estimate ancient temperatures (one of the tools to reconstruct surface temperatures).






 
Last edited:

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member

:killingme
 
Top