Try again...
"By responding "no" to the question of whether Carroll proved Trump raped her, the jurors
indicated they weren't convinced Trump penetrated Carroll with his penis, according to Kaplan, who first wrote about the issue in July when he
deniedTrump a new trial in the sexual abuse case."
Look at what a POS you are trying to defend a man who shoved his fingers in a woman's vagina without her permission. Grab em by the pus**-DJT
Yes and the judge later said that since Trump inserted his finger inside her it could be considered rape.
"Dismissing the counterclaim, a judge in New York, Lewis A Kaplan,
said that when Carroll repeated her allegation that Trump raped her, her words were “substantially true”. Kaplan also set out in detail why it may be said that Trump raped Carroll."
“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally –
in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
www.foxbusiness.com
abcnews.go.com
