Cowgirl
Well-Known Member
What about King Friday from The Neighborhood of Make Believe?
Correct as usual...
What about King Friday from The Neighborhood of Make Believe?
Once again you fail to grasp the concept. They do not have to claim anything in America and even if they did it could have been spiritually based on any level whatsoever. The onus is on the state.It does matter. You can't claim religious protection of the name if you don't intend it to be religious.
Wow, and just why did they like the sound of the name? THey could have called the child Christ and said the exact same thing. YOur failure to understand is telling.We named him Friday because we like the sound of the name
The fact that the church is involved at all would be a violation of church and state in the US and the fact that the judge chose a religious name to honor a religious ritual is another violation if it happened in America.No, if a Satan worshipper wanted to name their kid Satan the courts would not approve because the name is silly in their minds. Period. End of sentence. You are claiming that the court ("the state") did something for religious purposes. However, the church had the opposite reaction. Therefore, church and state are separate.
Are you being dense on purpose? Intent is only one aspect of this. Since other parents could choose the name for religious reason because it is a spiritual or religious name with a religious meaning should protect these parent's regardless. If it was America they should not have to pass a religious test in order to practice their right and the courts should not have even asked.Intent.
That's the whole point. If it was America the court should not even have chosen the name for whatever reason in the first place and it is severely questionable if they could have even denied the parent's choice of name because it can violate both the freedom of religious expression as well as the wall between church and state.So it would not be a church/state issue for you if they pulled out a baby name book and threw a dart?
The fact that the church is involved at all would be a violation of church and state in the US and the fact that the judge chose a religious name to honor a religious ritual is another violation if it happened in America.
You're right. I fail to understand what you're saying. Sounds to me like you're saying that the government has to prove that something is religious (even if it is not intended to be religious) so that they can be prevented from being involved.Once again you fail to grasp the concept. They do not have to claim anything in America and even if they did it could have been spiritually based on any level whatsoever. The onus is on the state.
Why do people like art? They just do. Get over it.Wow, and just why did they like the sound of the name? THey could have called the child Christ and said the exact same thing. YOur failure to understand is telling.
Let's assume that we had the "stupid name law" that the Italians have. If it was determined that the name given was due to religion, ok. That doesn't change that the name would be changed due to the "stupid name law". Can you provide me with a non-stupid name that does not have religion as the origin?The fact that the church is involved at all would be a violation of church and state in the US and the fact that the judge chose a religious name to honor a religious ritual is another violation if it happened in America.
I was wondering the same thing.Are you being dense on purpose?
No, because there is no religion involved in the decision that the name was stupid. That's the point. Your failure to understand is telling.Intent is only one aspect of this. Since other parents could choose the name for religious reason because it is a spiritual or religious name with a religious meaning should protect these parent's regardless. If it was America they should not have to pass a religious test in order to practice their right and the courts should not have even asked.
If I was an atheist in Italy and I wanted to name my kid Jesus, would it be ok if I was denied the right based on the fact that I did not choose the name as part of my religous belief? Should the courts even make me prove I have a religious intent or even ask?
No, they have to prove that they have a right to prevent people from using a name and since they cannot prove it is not an expression of religion they should have no involvment. The parents should not have even been asked why they gave the name....especially since the name has a religious meaning in the first place and it should have at least been assumed.You're right. I fail to understand what you're saying. Sounds to me like you're saying that the government has to prove that something is religious (even if it is not intended to be religious) so that they can be prevented from being involved.
Fixed.Why do people like religion? They just do. Get over it.
First of all Venus is Roman, not Greek. Second, it has nothing to do with Roman or Greek mythology, it has to do with Freya....or maybe they liked it because they are descendants of ancient Greeks who worshiped Venus and are subconsciously tapping into that knowledge that was passed on to them through their genes.
ScotLet's assume that we had the "stupid name law" that the Italians have. If it was determined that the name given was due to religion, ok. That doesn't change that the name would be changed due to the "stupid name law". Can you provide me with a non-stupid name that does not have religion as the origin?
Off topic but not totally... I love the name Tuesday for a girl. January as well.
I'll take "off topic" instead of the debate going on.
What about Wednesday Addams?
Don't forget "Picabo" as in Picabo Street, whose parents refused to give her any name at all, leaving the birth certificate to read "baby girl." They finally named her when she was about 2, after her favorite game (Peekaboo) because they wanted to get her a passport.
I'm not saying the law is right, but since it is the law in Italy and since the courts ruled the name had to be changed and since the parents refused to pick another name, the court had to pick something. :shrug:I was just saying the Tribunal changed the name to Gregory for that reason. I know nothing about Italy's laws. The Tribunal chose it for that reason and because they felt it would bring the child more peace socially or some such mess and the Court agreed.
rain roll on, on down the line,
Won't you please take me far away?
Now I feel the wind blow outside my door,
Means I'm leaving my woman behind.
Tuesday's gone with the wind.
My woman's gone with the wind.
And I don't know where I'm going.
I just want to be left alone.
Well, when this train ends I'll try again,
But I'm leaving my woman at home.
(chorus)
Tuesday's gone with the wind.
Tuesday's gone with the wind.
Tuesday's gone with the wind.
My woman's gone with the wind.
Train roll on many miles from my home,
See, I'm riding my blues away.
Tuesday, you see, she had to be free
But somehow I've got to carry on.
(chorus)
They should have let it stay Friday and he could be a sergeant when he grows up.
I used to work with a woman who told me the woman in the bed next to her in the maternity ward named her child that.Reminds me of a joke where the lady is lying in the hospital bed at the maternity room and when the child is brought to her she begins to cry. When asked why the tears she replies that she is crying because the hospital didnt wait for her to get to name her own child, they had names it for her, On the childs wrist was a bracelet that said Female Jones.
The mother cried and said the hospital had named her child FeeMolleee