Tigg is that you?Rotatory phone
I remember school, they taught math, reading, writing, history, civics, we even learned sex ed. If the kids can’t keep up, keep them back. Eventually being 15 in the sixth grade because you can’t read to that grade level should shame them into learning.Sometimes I'm like, what's the point of teaching cursive, nobody writes in it anymore. Other times I see new gen's handwriting and it's so damn awful. But the reality is teachers are forced to focus on getting these kids through basics of reading and mathematics in levels so below them, cursive is a non-essential.
I'm not one to assume public school will teach my child all the essentials so I do plan to make sure he has nice handwriting, at minimum it will be basic and legible. But reading comprehension is more important. True cursive is just a skill at this point.
I have a kind of mish mash of writing and printing that I use for everyday note taking. If I have to make something legible I have to print small. I can write, but I have a problem with keeping the text a consistent size.I write in cursive all the time, at least once a day. I'm looking at my grocery list and to-do lists right now - cursive.
Baltimore gifted program?being 15 in the sixth grade
One subject I did poor, along with spelling and Latin.Cursive (AKA penmanship) used to be taught and graded. It was dropped in 2010 from Common Core standards.
I actually did well in Latin, now I remember about 20 words and phrases.One subject I did poor, along with spelling and Latin.
I have a kind of mish mash of writing and printing that I use for everyday note taking.
I don't disagree, but some of you may recall No Child Left Behind act, that was pushed out by the Bush administration? This has essentially snowballed into No Child shall be kept back no matter how dumb or awful. Teachers have their hands tied with most of that. They're expected to pass every kid no matter what.I remember school, they taught math, reading, writing, history, civics, we even learned sex ed. If the kids can’t keep up, keep them back. Eventually being 15 in the sixth grade because you can’t read to that grade level should shame them into learning.
... My boss marvels at my penmanship and how I can do long lines of handwriting on a plain sheet of paper and it's all in a straight line without slanting up or down.
Romanes eunt domus!I actually did well in Latin, now I remember about 20 words and phrases.
What, in my mind, snowballed was that the schools that couldn't meet the standards worked more to avoid losing funding then helping the students meet the standards. It was the people that controlled the school systems that did the damage, not the law. That is until the follow on concepts like Common Core and the Every Student Succeeds act that replaced the NCLB.I don't disagree, but some of you may recall No Child Left Behind act, that was pushed out by the Bush administration? This has essentially snowballed into No Child shall be kept back no matter how dumb or awful. Teachers have their hands tied with most of that. They're expected to pass every kid no matter what.
It's unfortunate, that our schools have to follow what Dept of Education puts out as curriculum.I'm not sure why cursive became a thing in the first place. That would be something to look up when I get some time and think about it.
But honestly, teachers today are struggling to get kids to reading and math proficiency but back in my day, sonny, the teacher not only taught us that stuff (and we came out better educated) but she also had time to teach us cursive writing and other niceties. So what are these teachers doing with their time that they can't accomplish what their predecessors could?
I understand it's not always the teacher's fault - it's the bureaucracy with their garbage - but I also see those psycho bitches on TikTok who clearly have plenty of time to teach "their kids" political bullshit that turns them into raging racists and misogynists. And they're usually from areas that have the dumbest most uneducated kids. We're raising a generation of dolts.
So this sounds like some very good reasons for eliminating the DOE. Not every school is going to get better, but some succeeding is better than none succeeding.What, in my mind, snowballed was that the schools that couldn't meet the standards worked more to avoid losing funding then helping the students meet the standards. It was the people that controlled the school systems that did the damage, not the law. That is until the follow on concepts like Common Core and the Every Student Succeeds act that replaced the NCLB.
Shhhh. You'll ruin the plan.If they can't read it, they'll never know what is REALLY in the constitution and bill of rights.
No Child Left Behind had a focus on high-stakes testing and the pressure on schools to raise test scores. The teachers complained about the hard work they were required to do so the liberals changed it to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). That is how we get every kid passing even if they don't go to class.I don't disagree, but some of you may recall No Child Left Behind act, that was pushed out by the Bush administration? This has essentially snowballed into No Child shall be kept back no matter how dumb or awful. Teachers have their hands tied with most of that. They're expected to pass every kid no matter what.
That's what I meant by saying NCLB "snowballed" into what we have now. That was exactly my point. NCLB was always well intentioned but poorly executed, and several restructurings on standards have happened in response, and now we have a much larger issue in the DOE than ever before.No Child Left Behind had a focus on high-stakes testing and the pressure on schools to raise test scores. The teachers complained about the hard work they were required to do so the liberals changed it to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). That is how we get every kid passing even if they don't go to class.
At least NCLB educated the kids enough to pass the tests. Since that was obviously racist they changed to just pass the kids without requiring them to do anything at all.That's what I meant by saying NCLB "snowballed" into what we have now. That was exactly my point. NCLB was always well intentioned but poorly executed, and several restructurings on standards have happened in response, and now we have a much larger issue in the DOE than ever before.
@my-thyme as a former Catholic-school-educated kid when cursive was still mandatory, I think it's great you're willing to ensure your grands, at minimum, have legible handwriting. It is important. Just maybe not Nun-standards-essential