Daddy's New Roommate

Arista

New Member
It wasn't that long ago that interracial relationships were considered taboo. In 1957, segregationists claimed that interracial relationships were "a communist plot to destroy 'white America'." Jerry Falwell was a huge proponent of segregation and stated that "race mixing" would destroy "our race." Here it is 2007 and interracial relationships are no longer taboo.


I'm just sayin'... times are a changin'.
 

Gwendolyn

New Member
I'mno Mensa said:
Personally I dont want to read either one,nor do I want my kids reading garbage.

Unfortunately there are sick people who make love to people of the same sex. There are also sick people who do violence. Both are sick,and I dont want to read of either of them. If that doesnt make me "Progressive" I am sorry.

Did you really just compare two consenting adults having sex in the privacy of their home to armed robbery or murder?

Wow the more I read these boards and talk to my neighbors the less and less I want my children raised down here with these "values".
 

Arista

New Member
Daddy's New Roommate 08-16-2007 07:49 PM I wouldn't really want my daughter marrying a negro! That's just not right.

Wow.
 
K

kris31280

Guest
So let me get this straight... just in case I think I've got it wrong...

The book, which simply illustrated a way for a child to understand the situation if it were to happen to them (and it happens every day... that's why there's hundreds of books about it), is morally offensive to you and therefore you took it upon yourself to throw it in the garbage?

Seriously, with people like you we don't need to worry about fighting the war on terror in other countries... you're becoming a terrorist just like the man in the white house.
 

Pete

Repete
kris31280 said:
So let me get this straight... just in case I think I've got it wrong...

The book, which simply illustrated a way for a child to understand the situation if it were to happen to them (and it happens every day... that's why there's hundreds of books about it), is morally offensive to you and therefore you took it upon yourself to throw it in the garbage?

Seriously, with people like you we don't need to worry about fighting the war on terror in other countries... you're becoming a terrorist just like the man in the white house.
That is very intolerant of you.
 

Dork

Highlander's MPD
kris31280 said:
So let me get this straight... just in case I think I've got it wrong...

The book, which simply illustrated a way for a child to understand the situation if it were to happen to them (and it happens every day... that's why there's hundreds of books about it), is morally offensive to you and therefore you took it upon yourself to throw it in the garbage?

Seriously, with people like you we don't need to worry about fighting the war on terror in other countries... you're becoming a terrorist just like the man in the white house.

Apples v. Oranges! Why do you stupid sick liberals keep trying this sheet? What does my view on fags have ANYTHING to do with terrorists in other countries or Bush? I guess it made sense to you when you typed it but it really has no value. God Bless you!
 

Geek

New Member
Dork said:
Apples v. Oranges! Why do you stupid sick liberals keep trying this sheet? What does my view on fags have ANYTHING to do with terrorists in other countries or Bush? I guess it made sense to you when you typed it but it really has no value. God Bless you!


Tell me again why you hate gay people.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
kris31280 said:
you're becoming a terrorist just like the man in the white house.
:roflmao:

Hooo-kay!

I was getting ready to give Dork the business for being such a kirk out about gays. Now I think I'll just let you all have at it. :lol:
 

Geek

New Member
Check out who shares your views Dork!!


From an article on familyresearchinst.org in 1999,

"How did the Nazis deal with homosexuals? This question is partially answered by Rudolf Hoss who was in charge of some of these decisions in a recently translated German book. Himmler, one of Hitler's chief lieutenants, was particularly opposed to the gay movement and had much to do with expunging homosexuals from the public social fabric. Nevertheless, German law did not make homosexual conduct a capital crime either before the Nazi regime came into power nor during it, so the real issue for Hoss and his Nazi collaborators was how to "control" those addicted to homosexuality. Since the Nazi regime could get away with just about anything it wanted shy of execution to suppress homosexual activity, its experience provides some insight about the "containability" of homosexuality, at least under a dictatorship."
 
Geek said:
Check out who shares your views Dork!!


From an article on familyresearchinst.org in 1999,

"How did the Nazis deal with homosexuals? This question is partially answered by Rudolf Hoss who was in charge of some of these decisions in a recently translated German book. Himmler, one of Hitler's chief lieutenants, was particularly opposed to the gay movement and had much to do with expunging homosexuals from the public social fabric. Nevertheless, German law did not make homosexual conduct a capital crime either before the Nazi regime came into power nor during it, so the real issue for Hoss and his Nazi collaborators was how to "control" those addicted to homosexuality. Since the Nazi regime could get away with just about anything it wanted shy of execution to suppress homosexual activity, its experience provides some insight about the "containability" of homosexuality, at least under a dictatorship."

Yeah, but they also singled out other oddities of human nature as well so it's not like they were focused specifically on homosexuals. You need to come up with something else.
 

Pete

Repete
Geek said:
Check out who shares your views Dork!!


From an article on familyresearchinst.org in 1999,

"How did the Nazis deal with homosexuals? This question is partially answered by Rudolf Hoss who was in charge of some of these decisions in a recently translated German book. Himmler, one of Hitler's chief lieutenants, was particularly opposed to the gay movement and had much to do with expunging homosexuals from the public social fabric. Nevertheless, German law did not make homosexual conduct a capital crime either before the Nazi regime came into power nor during it, so the real issue for Hoss and his Nazi collaborators was how to "control" those addicted to homosexuality. Since the Nazi regime could get away with just about anything it wanted shy of execution to suppress homosexual activity, its experience provides some insight about the "containability" of homosexuality, at least under a dictatorship."
So if you aren't giggly with adoration for homosexuality you are a Nazi?
 

Geek

New Member
kwillia said:
Yeah, but they also singled out other oddities of human nature as well so it's not like they were focused specifically on homosexuals. You need to come up with something else.


I think anyone that shares a hatred with Hitler has some serious soul searching to do.

Something else?

Some of the people I love with all my heart happen to be gay. They have children that I love as well. I have been blessed to have friends and family that I love unconditionally. They happen to be amazing, caring people. Dork wouldn't make a decent pimple on their ass.
 
K

kris31280

Guest
Dork said:
Apples v. Oranges! Why do you stupid sick liberals keep trying this sheet? What does my view on fags have ANYTHING to do with terrorists in other countries or Bush? I guess it made sense to you when you typed it but it really has no value. God Bless you!
I quote dictionary.com:
"terrorist noun

a person who tries to frighten people or governments into doing what he/she wants by using or threatening violence"

I quote Pink in the song "Dear Mr. President"
"What kind of father would take his own daughter's rights away? And what kind of father might hate his daughter if she were gay?"

As an open bisexual woman and as an advocate for gay rights and equality, you tell me how else I am to view the man in charge other than a bumbling idiot and terrorist who pushes his agenda by implying the homosexual lifestyle is completely immoral and using the bible as his weapon of choice?

Homophobia has no place in today's society, just like racism has no place, and gender discrimination has no place... and any other number of things has no place. So call me a bleeding heart liberal if you will.

People fear what they do not understand.
 

Dork

Highlander's MPD
Geek said:
Tell me again why you hate gay people.

I really don't hate gay people. They are very funny and entertaining. Just hearing them speak and watching their behavior is funny as sh*t. I know we are being socially conditioned to say nothing and accept them as normal but most people I am around on a daily basis agree that it's a nasty lifestyle and joke about it all the time. Most of us know not to say anything but if you really wanna know the truth, most normal people are talking negatively about this craziness. At work, we are always joking about fags, but not in front of the known gays.

Geek, I don't hate gay people. I just don't accept it a normal healthy lifestyle. It's not!
 

Geek

New Member
Pete said:
So if you aren't giggly with adoration for homosexuality you are a Nazi?


You are missing the point. The call to hatred that Dork throws up here on the forums harkins back to some of History's worst mistakes. Dehumanizing people by choosing one characteristic that is different from the majority. So much of the wording reminds me of the arguments for Nazi Germany and slavery and against women's rights.
 
Top