Pasofever
Does my butt look big?
kwillia said:How do you feel about Fudgepacas?

PS I love that picture..

kwillia said:How do you feel about Fudgepacas?
It's true Fecal FreddyToxick said:
Gwendolyn said:What exactly was adult content? He said it showed two gay men kissing. There wasn't nudity and graphic sex. You want to remove any children's book that has kissing in it you'll have to start pitching fairy tales into the trash first. And every one of the books preparing for a new sibling. I'll go read the first post again but I'm rather sure he didn't say is graphically showed sex.
dems4me said:I have three answers
1) The idea of same sex relationships is adult in content due to the fact society and various religions has made it taboo.
2) A lot of folks think of gay people then immediately think of sex and two people of the same sex having sex.
3) Even if its jut guys kissing each other and pictures of guys kissing each other - or even two guys in love and sleeping in the same bed... its not the norm (not saying its wrong, its just not the norm)... the kid may not be mature enough to handle this.
I've always wondered about gay guys. Could someone answer this question?. Does dude #1 do dude #2 and then swap for dude #2 to do dude #1? Or does dude #1 get on, get off and go to sleep like hetro men?dems4me said:2) A lot of folks think of gay people then immediately think of sex and two people of the same sex having sex.
Gwendolyn said:I think you are looking at this through an adult's eyes not for whom the book was meant for. Kids don't think in sexual ways. Little boys kiss their Daddy and sometimes daddy and grandpa hug and kiss. They won't put a sexual spin on it until the parents point it out.
MMDad said:The thing is, I can stop my kids from reading a book like this that I don't want them to see. No harm done. I'm more concerned about people like Dork hanging out in the children's section of the library. It's a bit creepy.
Geek said::fixed:
Dork said:NO NO NO! It's not a purse, it's a magic bag!And, I posed for the pictures. Why would steal the one from the hospital?
![]()
CAPPY2609 said:Wow, so you took it upon yourself to censor a library and destroy materials in it.... Its good to know we have you out there to interpret and decide morality. Regardless of what kind of book it was, if you didnt like it then you should have put it back. That is the point of freedom of choice.
FACT: Not everybody has the same lifestyle
FICTION: You think they do or should
Dork said:I didnt' think of it as censorship. I thought of it as protecting our kids. If I was in a playground and saw some broken glass on the ground, wouldn't you want me to pick it up and throw it away? Kids don't need to run across crappy books like this. If you want your kid to read it, buy it but don't put it in the children's section. Keep it somewhere near the adult X videos so only adults can get to them.
Arista said:Ohmigawd! The Gay! The Gay! It's going to rub off! It's going to rub off!![]()
Call me "progressive," but I'd much rather my kids read about two people of the same sex in a loving relationship than read a news report about some guy who's thrown gasoline on his wife and set her on fire; or read a news report about some guy who's beaten his wife to death in front of the kids; or read a news report about some woman who had a contract hit put out on her husband. :shrug:
I'mno Mensa said:Personally I dont want to read either one,nor do I want my kids reading garbage.
Unfortunately there are sick people who make love to people of the same sex. There are also sick people who do violence. Both are sick,and I dont want to read of either of them. If that doesnt make me "Progressive" I am sorry.
Am I bigoted against perverts in same sex marriage??? Well :no more than I am bigoted against wife beaters or whore's who run out on their husbands. There are wives who are at fault as often as there are men who are at fault.
Each case has to be judged on its own merit. Certainly there is no excuse for a husband who throws gas on his wife and sets her afire.Nor is there any excuse for a wife who takes her SUV and runs down her husband and then backs over him to be sure she kills him.
Personally I dont care what perversions go on in the bedrooms of same sex couples,or the perversions that may go on in the bedrooms of male and female couples. As long as its consensual, have fun.
Just keep your preferences to yourself. Dont push it as a social agenda,and dont try recruiting my kids by teaching a homosexual agenda in school. Homosexuality should not be taught in school any more than Sado-Masochism , Necrophilia ,pedophilia or Bestiality,should be taught. School isnt the place for kids to learn about human sexual preferences. Either teach all the perversions or teach none. My vote is for none.
Pete said:Except I am iffy on the "recruiting" part. I don't think they are "recruiting" so much as they are trying to norm something in society that is not the norm and to most it is considered deviant behavior. The Gay activists know that swaying most adults is nearly impossible so they target kids.
Geek said:Got a picture of Dork just before he saved the world
SoMDGirl42 said:I think he threw the book away because he's really a closet homo and was afraid the kid would show the book to mommy and bust him out