Drones Over NJ

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
If you do it long enough, it gets really easy to determine altitudes and sizes of air vehicles....in the old days when we actually had to stand outside and fly them RC style, I could tell you within 100' or so how high something was.....haven't had to do that for quite some time but can still get pretty close.
You were easily able to do it because you knew the size of what you was looking at also.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
I asked about this "size of suvs" thing earlier. I have no idea where that's coming from other than people seeing lights at night. People absolutely suck at judging sizes and distances in the daytime.

Altitude and the size of flying things? Not a damn chance they are having any real clue.
That's why we get reports of a black mountain lion on here every so often.
 

thurley42

HY;FR
See, that assumes the "size of SUVs" is accurate. Have you seen anything with meat on it to back that us? Six feet wide at the prop tips isnt the size of an SUV.
Just the videos i've seen that appear to be flying way higher than the 400' and at the size they appear in the video they are much bigger than your local DJI clown....but how much bigger, not sure.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Just the videos i've seen that appear to be flying way higher than the 400' and at the size they appear in the video they are much bigger than your local DJI clown....but how much bigger, not sure.


This looks to capture some of the videos. Not getting much out of that. Especially with how cell phones amplify incoming light, making it hard to judge how far away from each other the nav lights are. the you coffee guy confidently tosses our numbers like 10,000 feet. Pretty sure he doesn't that's two miles up and a 737 is the size of a pinky nail at that altitude and not easy to hear at all.

I will note that triangle one with the tree branches is maybe the most useful. If it were even more than a few hundred feet up, its lights would all be obscured by one branch at the same time.

I suspect what we are seeing here is what I would call large drones, the hexacopter types that filmmakers use to carry Red cameras.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
Around 10k feet the air is thin enough that helicopters have a hard time hovering, so quadcopters might not even be able to go that high
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
One person not heard from in all of this is Transportation Secretary Mayor Pete. It is his ball park, but everything he is involved with has been useless.

I wonder if the proximity of the FAA Tech Center (Atlantic City) has some connection to the drone activity in NJ?
 

Grumpy

Well-Known Member
One person not heard from in all of this is Transportation Secretary Mayor Pete. It is his ball park, but everything he is involved with has been useless.

I wonder if the proximity of the FAA Tech Center (Atlantic City) has some connection to the drone activity in NJ?
Pete ain't got no time for that, he's looking around for his next sham job.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I was thinking that most LE helo's have FLIR or some other night vision equipment so tracking them when they go dark shouldn't be hard. Then I remembered my experience with night vision equipment. Trying to track something when the background is all lit up, as looking down towards the ground would be, would be difficult.
 

thurley42

HY;FR
Let us know how that Federal Prison Time works out.
The clowns won't be able to hit them anyway.....we did a test at Bragg back in the late 90s with a team of Rangers trying to shoot down a 12' wingspan UAS at 1k. Over a thousand rounds and 1 made it through a wing but the AV was fine. Not to mention I don't think i flew a night mission over a populated area without a least a few pot shots be taken at us.....and again, 1 time a round got through the wing, but it wasn't even noticed until the preflight the next day.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...



Thinking all this is simply a contrived and made up distraction to keep people, and Congress, from looking and talking about things that are far more serious in nature. Because if it was really a true security threat, it would have been handled long before it became a lengthy running news story. We have so many sensors, radars, electronic sensing receiver stations, electronic counter measures, etc., always activated and passively monitoring, and that nothing like this, if real, would ever be allowed to continue without some type of action.

Unless someone is setting up a false flag type of operation. Hummmm.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
IMG_1473.jpeg
 

thurley42

HY;FR
Can’t vouch for this photo but this is what they say they are seeing.
That's just your standard personal quadcopter........that's the other thing this does.....creates paranoia and now everything we see is the drones they are talking about.....I haven't broke it out in a few years, but you'd have to pay me to take my Inspire out now.....doesn't matter where i am or what i'm doing, some idiot will try to shoot it down....
 

black dog

Free America
The clowns won't be able to hit them anyway.....we did a test at Bragg back in the late 90s with a team of Rangers trying to shoot down a 12' wingspan UAS at 1k. Over a thousand rounds and 1 made it through a wing but the AV was fine. Not to mention I don't think i flew a night mission over a populated area without a least a few pot shots be taken at us.....and again, 1 time a round got through the wing, but it wasn't even noticed until the preflight the next day.
They would have gotten different results if it was shot north at Le June. :killingme
 
Top