Election 2024 Issues

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Trump Deranged Stephen A Smith GOES OFF On Democrats Over Illegal Immigrants ADMITS TRUMP WILL WIN!​


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I'm all for restricting access to these books, but the optics on this are just terrible

Progressives are already going to claim MAGA= Fascist / Nazi .... Why the hell are you giving them a loaded subject for them to shoot you with

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

MSNBC ADMITS DEFEAT As SCOTUS DESTROYS Anti Trump Lawyers Trying To Kick Trump Off Colorado Ballot!​


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

At Democratic retreat, House members worry border concerns will overshadow abortion in 2024


“I’m concerned that in blue states where reproductive rights are already protected, does the border become more salient than the threat to reproductive rights near metropolitan areas?” one moderate lawmaker who represents a suburban district said here at House Democrats’ annual retreat.

President Joe Biden and down-ballot Democrats can “perform well” on issues like reproductive rights, gun violence and the economy “when there is less chaos in the world,” the Democratic lawmaker said, noting that “public safety has improved in a lot of places and you see crime down.” But with wars worsening in the Middle East and Europe and recent record migrant crossings at the southern border, issues like border security “start to compete for salience, and that’s the concern.”

At the House Democrats’ yearly issues conference at the Lansdowne Resort near the Potomac River in northern Virginia, there were closed-door panels with experts on important issues such as reproductive rights, housing, child and elder care, lowering costs, unions, climate, engaging young voters, artificial intelligence, Ukraine and China. But there was no formal panel during the three-day gathering on immigration or border security — even as the issue reached a fever pitch on Capitol Hill in recent weeks.

“It’s a glaring omission,” said a senior House Democrat, one who represents a border state.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

How a special report into Joe Biden could be used as political ammunition by Donald Trump and Republicans


Joe Biden is seething.

Today's report into his handling of confidential documents he took when he was a senator and vice president ruled out criminal charges, but it has raised other serious questions.

It labelled Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".

After reading both the report and seeing the news coverage of it, the president knew he needed to counter the narrative.

So he decided to utilise the bully pulpit of the presidency and called a hastily arranged press conference at the White House.

"I know what the hell I am doing. I am president and I have put this country back on its feet," he declared to the press in the room, and the American people watching in prime time.

If the press conference was meant to restore public confidence in his mental ability, then his reference to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as being from Mexico, won't have helped.

But he might be hoping a more energised appearance could counter some of the imagery the findings brings to mind.

On the face of it, the report was good news.

After a yearlong investigation into his improper retention of classified documents, Special Counsel Robert Hur said there was no chance of jail time.

But, it was in part because Hur didn't think a jury would hold him responsible because of his mental state.

"It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his 80s — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of wilfulness," the report said.

Despite his angry response at the White House, the report's description of the president will likely raise alarms with American voters set to determine in November whether they want to give the 81-year-old another four-year term.

The report has also provided major ammunition to his political opponents.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Justice Brett Kavanaugh Delivers Reality Check to Colorado Attorney in Effort to Exclude Trump from Ballot: ‘Trump Has Not Been Charged with an Insurrection’




The legal theories are based on Section 3 of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment which states public officials who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the US may be disqualified from public office.

During the proceedings, Justice Kavanaugh directly addressed Colorado attorney Jason Murray, emphasizing the absence of criminal charges against Trump related to insurrection.

Kavanaugh’s remarks shed light on the broader implications of the case, questioning the appropriateness of state-level decisions on matters potentially covered by federal statutes against insurrection. Kavanaugh highlighted existing federal statutes, like Section 2383 of Title 18, which already address the issue of insurrection.

Kavanaugh: “Some of the rhetoric of your position seems to suggest, unless the states can do this, no one can prevent insurrectionists from holding federal office. But obviously, Congress has enacted statutes, including one still in effect, Section 2383 of Title 18. [It] prohibits insurrection – it’s a federal criminal statute. And, if you’re convicted of that you are – it says, ‘shall be disqualified from holding any office.’ And so, there is a federal statute on the books, but President Trump has not been charged with that. So what are we to make of that?
Murray: “Two things, your honor. Section 2383 was initially enacted about six years before Section 3. It wasn’t meant as implementing legislation related to Section 3. And I would emphasize that by the time that Section 3 was ratified, most Confederates had already received criminal pardon.”
Kavanaugh: “I guess the question is a little bit different, which is, if the concern you have—which I understand—is that insurrectionists should not be able to hold federal office, there is a tool to ensure that that does not happen, namely, federal prosecution of insurrectionists. And if convicted, Congress made clear, you are automatically barred from holding a federal office. That tool exists, you agree, and could be used but could be used against someone who committed…”

Justice Kavanaugh, referring to historical precedent, suggested the dormant nature of Section 3 over the past 150 years reflected a longstanding understanding based on legal history and congressional action or inaction.

Excerpt via Mediate:

Murray: There’s a reason section three has been dormant for 150 years, and it’s because we haven’t seen anything like January 6th since reconstruction. Insurrection against the Constitution is something extraordinary.
Roberts: It seems to me you’re avoiding the question, which is other states may have different views about what constitutes insurrection.
And now you’re saying, well, it’s all right, because somebody presumably us are going to decide. Well, they said they thought that was an insurrection, but they were wrong. And maybe they thought it was right. And we’d have to develop rules for what constitutes an insurrection.
Murray: Yes. Your honor, just like this court interprets other constitutional provisions, this court can make clear that an insurrection against the Constitution is something extraordinary.
And in particular, it really requires a concerted group effort to resist through violence, not some ordinary application of state or federal law, but the functions mandated by the Constitution–
Kavanaugh: On your point that it’s been dormant for 155 years. I think the other side would say the reason for that is Chief Justice Chase’s opinion in 1869, in Griffin’s case, to start, which says that Congress has the authority here, not the states.
That’s followed up by the Enforcement Act of 1870, in which Congress acts upon that understanding, which is followed, and there’s no history contrary in that period. As Justice Thomas pointed out, there’s no history contrary in all the years leading up to this of states exercising such authority.
I think the reason it’s been dormant is because there’s been a settled understanding that Chief Justice Chase, even if not right in every detail, was essentially right. And the branches of the government have acted under that settled understanding for 155 years.
And Congress can change that. And Congress does have section 2383, of course, the Insurrection Act, criminal statute. But Congress could change it. But they have not. And 155 years in relevant respects for what you want here today at least.
Murray: No, Justice Kavanaugh! The reason why it’s been dormant is because by 1876, essentially all former Confederates had received amnesty. And we haven’t seen anything like an insurrection since then.


Trump has not been charged with engaging in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Trump Deranged Michael Rapaport ADMITS Liberal Media TRICKED HIM & DECLARES He WON'T VOTE FOR BIDEN!​


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Trump: If Biden ‘Too Mentally Incompetent to Convict,’ He’s Unfit to Serve



“The special counsel’s report tries to let Biden off by claiming that he is too mentally incompetent to convict at a trial,” Trump noted, implying that this demonstrates Biden is unfit to lead. “‘I’m not going to charge him with a crime, but it’s okay for him to become Commander in Chief’ – think of that one.”

After a brief disturbance, in which an anti-Trumper in attendance made an outburst and was quickly removed, Trump said, “But we know that Joe Biden has always been too mentally incompetent.”

In his report, Hur cited Biden’s memory as a factor in the decision not to prosecute, as Breitbart News Capitol Hill Correspondent Bradley Jaye noted:

The report says the investigation “uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen” but does not establish guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Yet Hur’s assessment of Biden’s “significantly limited” memory also played a part in his decision not to prosecute.
“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” the report states. “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt.”

Trump, who has been charged on 40 counts in his own classified documents case by Special Counsel Jack Smith under Biden’s Department of Justice, also contended the decision not to prosecute Biden underscores “a weaponized two-tiered system of justice in this country.”

“Crooked Joe got off scot-free,” Trump said before quipping, “and I don’t know if you call it scot-free; they said he was a mental basket case.”
 

Kyle

ULTRA-F###ING-MAGA!
PREMO Member
Right on time.
Who had Bubonic Plague in the new pandemic pool?
il_340x270.3133391983_6olr.jpg
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Biden Campaign's Desperate Race-Baiting Attack on Trump Gets Ripped to Shreds by the People







So many messed up things in that one deceitful statement from the Biden team.

Let's start with the falsehood -- Trump did not call for "rounding up millions of Latinos." He called for the deportation of illegal aliens. Is the Biden team actually equating Latinos and illegal aliens? Wow, what a window into how they view Latinos and how insulting and race-baiting the Biden team is being here. Illegal aliens come from all over the world, but the Biden team seems not to understand that. That's a problem if they don't comprehend that basic fact.

The Biden team is now trying to convince the American people that they care about border security. But real border security is enforcing the law. Trump is talking about border security here, he's talking about deporting people who have entered the country illegally. That's the law. So why does the Biden team seem to have an issue with enforcing what's on the books? Of course, they've had an issue for three years enforcing the law, but this tweet only re-enforces their problematic approach. The American people, including Latinos, want the rules enforced, and that's why they are unhappy with Joe Biden for the failure.

Trump also doesn't say anything about camps in this clip, although there have been reports that he's thinking of sites near the border to assist in the deportation process. But if we are talking about camps, what are those things that the Biden team has for illegal aliens? Party tents? I don't think so. Why doesn't the Biden team talk about their camps for illegal aliens?

But perhaps their race-baiting and ignorance is not surprising, given the racism and ignorance that Joe Biden frequently displays.

The funny thing was that so many of the responses on X not only called out the deceitful claim about Latinos but also mocked the Biden team for basically advertising for Trump with the video. They said deportation of illegal aliens and enforcing the law was what they wanted -- someone who was going to take the problem seriously, unlike Joe Biden.






 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Trump also doesn't say anything about camps in this clip, although there have been reports that he's thinking of sites near the border to assist in the deportation process. But if we are talking about camps, what are those things that the Biden team has for illegal aliens? Party tents? I don't think so. Why doesn't the Biden team talk about their camps for illegal aliens?
I thought the camps were for Dems and their lackeys in the media.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Crowd ERUPTS Into 'F Joe Biden' CHANTS While SHOUTING DOWN Liberal Protestor DISRUPTING Trump Rally​


 
Top