Verisimilitude
Owl
K_Jo said:Forum experts are in the lab working round the clock to clone her.
Maybe they should call her Dolly instead of Jazz.
K_Jo said:Forum experts are in the lab working round the clock to clone her.
Chasey_Lane said:Your husband must be a scholar, too, since he knows so much about the Bible as well.
You want a link, find it yourself - it's out there!
The early manuscripts express it as "man laying with man" or "woman laying with woman" or "giving up their natural function" or "unatural desire". The meaning is clear.Chasey_Lane said:More on my research:
The Bible says absolutely nothing about homosexuality being sinful when you examine the actual Hebrew/Greek texts. The word "homosexuality" didn't even exist until 1869. The word first appeared in Germany to describe the theory that from birth some people are predisposed toward persons of the same sex. Since the biblical languages had no words for heterosexual or homosexual, it is anachronistic and misleading when homosexual is used to translate a biblical text. It is wrong to proclaim the biblical view of homosexuality since there is none. This violates the integrity of the individual texts and the biblical witness as a whole. Each reference to what is today homosexuality must be read in the light of the particular literary, cultural, and historic contexts of any particular passage.
Verisimilitude said:How do you explain the text in the Bible that describes a woman laying down with a woman or a man with a man in the bible. Isn't the concept of woman laying down (in the Biblical sense) with another woman and men having sex with men, considered homosexuality?
Who said anything about a forum spat?Verisimilitude said:I don't want to get in the middle of a forum spat, but it appears that Sharon was joking and she even used the smilie... why did you roll your eyes, then shoot a "thinly veiled barb" at her husband and end it by telling her to find it herself - that seemed a little harsh for someone that was only joking. Are we a little touchy today?
As was what I posted. :shrug:2ndAmendment said:The meaning is clear.
Chasey_Lane said:Who said anything about a forum spat?
Verisimilitude said:Seemed like person A was trying to help and joked about something facetiously and you took it personal. I thought that would be considered a forum spat.
I apologize in advance if that was not the case or your post was supposed to have been as lighthearted and as funny as Person A's post. :busybody:
2ndAmendment said:The early manuscripts express it as "man laying with man" or "woman laying with woman" or "giving up their natural function" or "unatural desire". The meaning is clear.
elaine said::fixed:
Verisimilitude said:I will try to do the same for you one day.
Verisimilitude said:2A- Is there I would ":bump:"?"
Verisimilitude said:In hindsight, I guess that is how things came across. Thank you for pointing out the err of my ways. I will try to do the same for you one day.
Are you saying that Verisimilitude is an elaine MPD and she is conversing with herself?dems4me said:Hi!!! CarrieBlue!!!!!
2ndAmendment said:Are you saying that Verisimilitude is an elaine MPD and she is conversing with herself?
:silly: girl.dems4me said:
Hi K-Jo!!!!
:ducks&runs: