So who was being fake? Everyone? Including Geraldo?
Except for Gutfeld!™
So who was being fake? Everyone? Including Geraldo?
The blow out between the two of them made some good TV.I saw that. That's what made me think - initially - it was an amicable parting.
So who was being fake? Everyone? Including Geraldo?
Reminded me of the early days of The Five with Bolling and Beckel.The blow out between the two of them made some good TV.
That's before my time.Reminded me of the early days of The Five with Bolling and Beckel.
Funny you should mention that.Every time I see Jessica now, Lokis quote “Mewling quim“ comes to mind.
Every time I see her now, I wish for Geraldo to take her place. Her naivety drives me up the wall.Every time I see Jessica now, Lokis quote “Mewling quim“ comes to mind.
Paid stooge, can't possibly be that stupid.............. maybe she is.Every time I see her now, I wish for Geraldo to take her place. Her naivety drives me up the wall.
She is..Paid stooge, can't possibly be that stupid.............. maybe she is.
Men too.There are millions just like her.
We care here speaking of how naive she is, how she cannot see what is happening before her eyes, but the fact is that there are millions of women just like her. They appear normal, most of them are likable, most of them are intelligent in ever genre but politics. But they vote for Joe Biden.
They make up crap like this then run with it across the spectrum to get it in the publics minds. Facts be damned.Last night she started to spout off that Trump had three sets of "books." The real set, a set for Deutsche Bank, and a third for the IRS. I remember it being mentioned in the MSM, but I don't remember them ever being presented. Judge Jeanine shut her down pretty quick.
But... but... he had THREE sets of books!!!They make up crap like this then run with it across the spectrum to get it in the publics minds. Facts be damned.
Like the bullshit that presenting a higher estimated value of a piece of property was a crime.
They deflect and rant on to some other line of bull$#!t whenever it's brought up that the Banks did "THEIR OWN ASSESSMENTS" and loaned according to that.
She has made it very clear that she votes Democrat purely because of women's rights. Also known as Abortion. This is her excuse as to why Melania Trump was never on magazine covers and such. Why they never ask her how Democrats pushing for men in women's sports is a slap in the face to women's rights annoys me. And lastly, a big case of TDS. If she could just make her point on the facts and not veer off to "but Trump" every time, I would have a little bit more respect for her.There are millions just like her.
We care here speaking of how naive she is, how she cannot see what is happening before her eyes, but the fact is that there are millions of women just like her. They appear normal, most of them are likable, most of them are intelligent in ever genre but politics. But they vote for Joe Biden.
It’s clear that the Judge can’t stand her, but for good reason. GENERALLY each person gets their say ONCE on an issue - one person on the panel starts and closes the remarks per segment and person speaks ONCE. Jessica FREQUENTLY interrupts if she disagrees and I once saw the Judge get seriously pissed when Jessica complained that the Judge interrupted (after the Judge started her bit and Jessica interrupted).She has made it very clear that she votes Democrat purely because of women's rights. Also known as Abortion. This is her excuse as to why Melania Trump was never on magazine covers and such. Why they never ask her how Democrats pushing for men in women's sports is a slap in the face to women's rights annoys me. And lastly, a big case of TDS. If she could just make her point on the facts and not veer off to "but Trump" every time, I would have a little bit more respect for her.
Yeah, but they interrupt her a LOT too.It’s clear that the Judge can’t stand her, but for good reason. GENERALLY each person gets their say ONCE on an issue - one person on the panel starts and closes the remarks per segment and person speaks ONCE. Jessica FREQUENTLY interrupts if she disagrees and I once saw the Judge get seriously pissed when Jessica complained that the Judge interrupted (after the Judge started her bit and Jessica interrupted).
I’ll give her one thing - she comes PREPARED. She doesn’t just depend on having support from everyone else and just “wing it”. She’s a lot like Brazile where she is WELL INFORMED on talking points - until they’re widely shown to be BS and not brought up again.
Examples - most illegals are visa overstays. Baloney. If that were true we’d be teeming with Canadians. Another - most fentanyl comes in through the ports. No. Most is seized there, for obvious reasons. Another - crime is down. Not really. Reported crime is WAY down even when actual crime is up - and arrests are way down.
She doesn’t still repeat these.
Maher is often spot on - except when the issue is Republicans or religion. He clearly hates both and they’re a trigger for him. I’ve read his books and had I not known it was him, I’d swear it was someone like PJ O’Rourke or even Piers Morgan.That's what I can't stand. Same will Bill Maher.
I guess it's just the triggered part that gets me. I truly enjoy hearing a different perspective and throw in your facts so I can judge for myself. Just don't go down that rabbit hole, because then I start to think your facts are bs and not worth my time.Maher is often spot on - except when the issue is Republicans or religion. He clearly hates both and they’re a trigger for him. I’ve read his books and had I not known it was him, I’d swear it was someone like PJ O’Rourke or even Piers Morgan.
Some people are that way, no matter how “smart” they are. They’re triggered.