Govt Work at Home May Be Over

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
My thing about it is -

I’ve been doing WAH years before the pandemic - mainly a COST-SAVING measure since GSA decided to cram two more agencies into our already overcrowded building. Admittedly UNTIL the pandemic - I still had to come in a couple times a week.

The thing for me is - my job is 100% solitary. Even when I am IN the building, none of my JOB ever has any interaction personally - with anyone. I don’t collaborate. I don’t work on a team. I don’t consult and I don’t mentor or teach. Whether I am home or physically at the building my work - and the majority of my peers - doesn’t change. I login with my assigned laptop, code, troubleshoot, analyze and log off. IF for any reason I need to talk to someone else, I use MS Teams. Why? Because even when I am on site, anyone I work with is either not likely to be in that day or was assigned a workstation THAT day (they change every time you come in) very far from you. Everyone on Teams is a click away and we can share screens - something I CANNOT do in person.

In short - my WAH experience is in every way identical to my on site experience. No one comes by my desk. No one calls except via Teams. The only difference is the 3 hours of additional driving. It is otherwise 100% the same.

It is NOT “more efficient “ or cost saving. My daily work is tracked with excruciating detail.

And - the data used to claim empty buildings is massively flawed.
And that's what you tell Elon and Vivek when you get called in front of them.
 

Bobwhite

Well-Known Member
So if you’ve been on the gravy train for the last 4 years, will you quit or will you tuck your tail between your legs and go back to the office? As much as I have enjoyed the decreased traffic levels in Great Mills and on 235 in the evenings when I do have to travel those roads, I really think people need to be in the office so as no to abuse my tax dollars. I hope this happens and I hope it reduces the government workforce when it does happen.
Oh, dear. I don't know you, so I hope you are kidding when you say that.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
And that's what you tell Elon and Vivek when you get called in front of them.
Vivek seems to think that a government worker of several decades - who might be dead weight - is going to just QUIT by being compelled to physically return.

He’s a smart guy but he’s dirt stupid on that one.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Oh, dear. I don't know you, so I hope you are kidding when you say that.
There’s nothing efficient or cost saving about it. The purpose is to piss people off enough to quit. If you’re a 50 year old government employee with a TSP and a pension and great benefits - that certainly won’t happen if you suck at your job.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
I am going to guess they won't call *everyone* back into the office, but because it's government you can count on them to do whatever is the stupidest and most expensive. If you were WFH before the lockdowns I can't think of a reason why they'd want you to put in daily face time now.

Also if you work for a contractor and not the government, this shouldn't affect you.

Everyone freaks out over change - or change back, as the case may be.
Because in almost every case change is for the worse, you are right they will probably do whatever is the stupidest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
My thing about it is -

I’ve been doing WAH years before the pandemic - mainly a COST-SAVING measure since GSA decided to cram two more agencies into our already overcrowded building. Admittedly UNTIL the pandemic - I still had to come in a couple times a week.

The thing for me is - my job is 100% solitary. Even when I am IN the building, none of my JOB ever has any interaction personally - with anyone. I don’t collaborate. I don’t work on a team. I don’t consult and I don’t mentor or teach. Whether I am home or physically at the building my work - and the majority of my peers - doesn’t change. I login with my assigned laptop, code, troubleshoot, analyze and log off. IF for any reason I need to talk to someone else, I use MS Teams. Why? Because even when I am on site, anyone I work with is either not likely to be in that day or was assigned a workstation THAT day (they change every time you come in) very far from you. Everyone on Teams is a click away and we can share screens - something I CANNOT do in person.

In short - my WAH experience is in every way identical to my on site experience. No one comes by my desk. No one calls except via Teams. The only difference is the 3 hours of additional driving. It is otherwise 100% the same.

It is NOT “more efficient “ or cost saving. My daily work is tracked with excruciating detail.

And - the data used to claim empty buildings is massively flawed.
My building isn't big enough, so right before Covid they were in the process of removing cubicles and replacing them with the carrels that are in the public library to cram in more people. These aren't people that work virtually, everyone has a lot of physical stuff to do their job. Thankfully Covid hit and they abandoned that idiocy.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
My building isn't big enough, so right before Covid they were in the process of removing cubicles and replacing them with the carrels that are in the public library to cram in more people. These aren't people that work virtually, everyone has a lot of physical stuff to do their job. Thankfully Covid hit and they abandoned that idiocy.
We had people at tables in the hallways, closets, printer rooms, under stairs. And right when that happened, another agency moved in.

So my agency got a good idea - during the hiatus , revamp the entire buildings and structure everything around telework. Meeting rooms vastly upgraded for remote attendance - seriously, they’re awesome. The workstations are state of the art and so is the new kiosk registration system.

It’s cool. If NEEDED you can reserve a team room online and have a week to brainstorm. Security throughout the buildings is first rate.

BUT - the design assumes something I think is coming - the demise of the traditional office. The design assumes a future where telework is the norm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
Some may retire, I doubt many will quit.
I see younger government workers quit all the time. One thing I see down here is we get a lot of ones straight out of college that just took the first job they found, don't move here and try to commute from say Silver Spring while looking for a job closer to home. I told my branch head to never hire someone that lives more than an hour away but less than two hours away because this keeps happening to us. Younger workers also look for flexibility to be able to telework if they can.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Sorry but the latest employment numbers came out. Once again, the largest job growth was in government jobs. The US can't continue on that trajectory. If Elon and Vivek can force people out of the government sector and into the private sector. (The real private sector.) We all will be better off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TPD

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Sorry but the latest employment numbers came out. Once again, the largest job growth was in government jobs. The US can't continue on that trajectory. If Elon and Vivek can force people out of the government sector and into the private sector. (The real private sector.) We all will be better off.
The flotsam they need to push out of government would be less than worthless in the private sector.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
Sorry but the latest employment numbers came out. Once again, the largest job growth was in government jobs. The US can't continue on that trajectory. If Elon and Vivek can force people out of the government sector and into the private sector. (The real private sector.) We all will be better off.
Yes and no. Reducing the deadwood is a good thing, but from past experience, a contractor working on a govt contract costs far more than a govt employee doing the same task.

One contract I was working on cost the program $145,000 per year, my (unburdened) salary was around $60,000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Yes and no. Reducing the deadwood is a good thing, but from past experience, a contractor working on a govt contract costs far more than a govt employee doing the same task.

One contract I was working on cost the program $145,000 per year, my salary was around $60,000.
Why I added the real private sector. A contractor is just a better paid civil servant.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
Considering what the local GS scale looks like around here for 12s and above, I don’t know that that’s so much the case anymore.
I'm a pretty close to maxed out GS-14, the contractors that are equivalent to the GS-13s under me make significantly more than I do, so I am guessing my equivalent makes even more.
 

TPD

the poor dad
A common theme I'm reading between the lines here in this thread is that we have too many government workers.

I had a whole tirade I just typed concerning WFH government employees, but just deleted it - it's best I keep my mouth shut - already said too much. This is a hot button topic in an area like ours and the answer is not an easy one.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Sorry but the latest employment numbers came out. Once again, the largest job growth was in government jobs. The US can't continue on that trajectory. If Elon and Vivek can force people out of the government sector and into the private sector. (The real private sector.) We all will be better off.
Not federal government.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Bear in mind that the entire federal payroll is like 280 billion. Out of a six trillion dollar budget, it’s not much even if you fired ALL of them.

That and the fact that your typical DC area fed is like a tenth of that - most feds don’t work around DC even though the largest single group DOES.
 

22AcaciaAve

Well-Known Member
I LMAO about all of this. This is all about trying to make people quit. Clowns Musk and Ramaswamy want to show reductions in the federal work force and this is their way to do it taking the easy way out.

No doubt the government work force needs to be reduced. But do the hard work. Go agency by agency, department by department and figure out who you need to keep and who should go. The clowns want to take the easy way out.

As for telework, sure some people take advantage of it, but some actually benefit from it. Take a good hard look at all of the government owned buildings, the security and maintenance dollars involved for all of them. Then tell me that those dollars are needed. There are ways to monitor if people are working from home or not. The best way is basically if people are getting their tasks done.

People like Musk and Ramaswamy don't understand that. They both have thrown millions of dollars at their ventures to make them successful. That's not what we want government to do. We want to throw less money at something and make it successful. These clowns do not understand that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP
Top