Gun Confiscations Underway
- Thread starter Gilligan
- Start date
itsrequired
New Member
Who confronted me with "facts"? Certainly not you; that's never your style.
The fact is, he never raised the argument that he was not at home and the police knew or should have known that at the time of the execution of the warrant. That's a fact.
itsrequired
New Member
Typical of you;More of that "reliable" information you post!!!!! Some guy named bill in an editorial....hahah
http://www.baumbach.org/b2evolution/..._police_then_f
background...
Last edited:
Where you get your facts?
more here. No mention of the son's whereabouts in this one. But the fundamental 2A v. 4A issue remains the same. It was never the son's firearms that were an issue. He apparently didn't even have any.
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/on_the_front_lines/rutherford_institute_asks_us_supreme_court_to_ensure_that_lawful_gun_owners
Gee Barney...you fail to see the irony in your reflexive dismissals whilst always failing to every provide your own links. Sad, really. Good thing you aren't in law enforcement.
It's long...but an interesting read.
https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/12-19-2013_Quinn-Petition.pdf
https://www.rutherford.org/files_images/general/12-19-2013_Quinn-Petition.pdf
itsrequired
New Member
Where you get your facts?
more here. No mention of the son's whereabouts in this one. But the fundamental 2A v. 4A issue remains the same. It was never the son's firearms that were an issue. He apparently didn't even have any.
QUOTE]
http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2013/05-12-00049-cr-1.html
You are easy. So easy. Got any other sources? The enquirer write anything?
I'll give you your next move. Now it will be to change the topic. You will move away from him not being home, and try some other insult. You are very predictable.
*snicker* Some good stuff here..
http://viralsurvival.com/2014/03/10/seventy-two-killed-resisting-gun-confiscation-in-Mass/
http://viralsurvival.com/2014/03/10/seventy-two-killed-resisting-gun-confiscation-in-Mass/
Nope..still perfectly the same. The fundamental 2A v. 4A issue remains the same. It was never the son's firearms that were an issue. He apparently didn't even have any.
itsrequired
New Member
If you read it, you would see again that there was no mention that the police knew, or should have known Brian wasn't in that home. That is after all what you bolded to make your argument known right?
itsrequired
New Member
You need to read the CASE FACTS that outline the warrant. The police had information that Brian kept an AK 47. I know reading what you don't like is difficult for you, but if you want to be honest than that is the best method.
So you are no longer arguing that the police knew or should have known he was in the house. Now you are arguing the police knew or should have known Brian didn't have a firearm. Of course, that is not what is in the case facts. The case facts indicate the police had information he did. You are way too easy.
Go ahead, call me names. I'll just keep providing factual information.
I'll chalk it up to providing a valuable public service. Keeps you off the streets, where you might harm yourself or others.
Hey Jillian how are the update's ....oh that's right ,can't update your lies .
Quite a while back, Mo. You too busy to keep up?..or just too stupid?
Here.. http://forums.somd.com/threads/285707-Gun-Confiscations-Underway?p=5352626&viewfull=1#post5352626
Meanwhile, in new news: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/03/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-ares-armor-raided-atf/
Last edited:
It's all she does ,she made up this story and got het ass handed to her and now the name calling starts .All you can do is laugh at her and move on .