ylexot
Super Genius
Now this is just plain stupid. If you want the explicit lyrics, you point your browser to itunes instead of Wal-Mart and pay the whopping 11 cents. Is it worth those 11 cents? To some people it is. To others it isn't. Wal-Mart is shooting themselves in the foot by using a "proprietary format" (let me guess...wma?) if the most popular player doesn't support that. Likewise, Apple is shooting themselves in the foot while trying to protect a non-existant monopoly by not supporting formats other than mp3. And "where does that leave iTunes? They would either be forced to raise prices or end their business" is justtruby20 said:A few months ago they launched an online music store and any download is available for 88 cents...11 cents cheaper than the most popular store, iTunes. But they are only offering edited versions of explicit tracks. So Wal-Mart is able to offer downloads cheaper than anyone else because of their buying power, then gives the customers edited versions of explicit tracks. American Public decides to buy all their Hillary Duff songs from Walmart.com, where does that leave iTunes? They would either be forced to raise prices or end their business...that won't happen right now because Wal-Mart uses a proprietary format that is incompatible with the most popular MP3 player, the iPod. But you see where I'm going with this....why limit our choices?
