I personally believe in the scripture and creation as given in the book of Genesis. I believe that if even one word of the Bible (in the original languages) is not trustworthy, then none of it is trustworthy including salvation.
I cannot prove creation nor can anyone prove evolution. Evolution is a matter of faith as is belief in the Bible. Consider how often "modern" science has been wrong; earth was the center of the universe, earth was flat, everything was made of three elements - earth, wind, and fire. People miss that evolution is still a theory. A theory is not a fact but a proposed, unproven idea. When a theory is proven, it is no longer called a theory.
I raise this issue. As I understand it, all the dating methods are based on assumptions of radioactive elements being at certain levels and known decay rates or half-life. The math formulas that are used have "fudge factors" in them that are valid within given ranges. It is usual that "fudge factor" values would be chosen (since they cannot be determined) as the median value of the range. I have been told (cannot verify) that the values for these "fudge factors" have been chosen at the extreme of the range that would cause the resulting calculated date to be the oldest. For further consideration, all these methods were developed post WWII after open air detonation of atomic devices had forever changed the amount of radioactive material, carbon or otherwise, on the surface of the earth.
Darwin had questions about his own theory. It has been reported (I don't think proven) that he refuted his own theory before he died, but whether he did or did not is irrelevant. He did question the evolution of the eye and the evolution of creatures that require male and female to reproduce. There were others, but these two raise serious doubts of evolution in my mind. Darwin asked why an eye would develop if there were no previous need for an eye; other creatures had and do get along quite well without the ability to see. Sexual reproduction is even harder to answer for anyone that is truthful in their deliberation. Why would sexual reproduction evolve? How would it evolve? It would require the male and female to evolve at the same time and in the same location. I don't offer these examples as proof against evolution; they are just for consideration. It is evidence that if you just accept evolution, you accept it on faith in evolution, not proof of evolution.
I do not expect this post to convince anyone that the Bible is the divine Word of God as I believe. I have posted that that is not my job, but I hope that this has given you "food for thought".