I hate everyone right now

[sunnydaze]

From People Magazine:
Flynt to Keep Lid on Topless Lynch Pics
Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt says he purchased nude
photos of Pfc. Jessica Lynch but now will not run them in the
February issue after all, because she's a "good kid" who became
"a pawn for the government." Flynt tells the Associated Press
that he bought the topless photos last month from male soldiers
who purportedly participated in the amateur shoot with the Army
supply clerk. The men "wanted to let it be known that she's not
all apple pie," Flynt said. "My first intention was to publish
them, but I don't think it was the best, positive move I could
make," Flynt tells the news service. "She's very much a pawn for
the government. They force-fed us a Joan of Arc." Speaking to
AP, Lynch declined to comment on any aspect of the photos, including
whether they even exist. Her attorney, Stephen Goodwin,
however, did appear to confirm their existence. In a statement he
said: "It's incredulous that anyone would think it appropriate in
any way to attempt to publish unauthorized photos of Jessica --
photos taken before she was deployed to Iraq and before her
capture and rescue."

 

[Danzig]

So, has anyone seen the Paris Video? If so, what did you think of it?


.......Yes you can PM me for the link to it.

 

[tater]

Originally posted by vraiblonde

And, Tater, if they publish them and you buy that issue, I'll never forgive you!!!

But it would be helping her because I'm sure she'd get a cut. A win-win if I've ever seen one!

One question though.... if I were to buy it, does that mean you'd cut me off

 

[jazz lady]

Hey Tater!

Lookie here!

You CAN help save them by buying the mags!

 

[tater]

Re: Hey Tater!

Originally posted by jazz lady
Lookie here!

You CAN help save them by buying the mags!

I just seen that thread (still internetless at home)

It would be hard to go back to "using" mags again though. I guess they are outta luck. It would be like going from Porche 911 to a 73 VW beetle

 

[metoo]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
That's because men are immature. 80 year old codgers still want to see some 18 year old's boobies. Once women get to the point that they have REAL sex lives, looking at pictures of weenies doesn't excite them so much.

With all due respect, that's not really correct.

Men are more visually inclined, stimulated, etc.
Men have more visually oriented references with EVERYTHING in life.
Women are more cerebral in what "turns them on". They prefer to have things described or read to them than look at pictures.

 

[vraiblonde]

Originally posted by metoo
Men are more visually inclined, stimulated, etc.

Is that a fact? Then explain to me why all the 900 # sex chat ads are directed at MEN? You know, the visually stimulated ones?

 

[crabcake]

Here's my (as always) unpopular opinion

I have no clue what the pics look like (if they are nude or semi-clothed or what). I'm guessing she was wearing a swimsuit of some sort or perhaps nothing at all.

I view this the same way I view someone who wears a top that reveal everything except its tag.

Don't flaunt it if you don't want others to see/comment on it.

It's like going to a beach. You wear a little bikini/thong ... while you are laying out enjoying the sun, the Williams family poses for a family picture near you to go on their "What we did on our summer vacation" website. Low and behold, little miss bearly-there is in the picture. Anyone can save that pic from the Williams' site and zoom in and post the chic's pic on a porn site or elsewhere. What do you do? Ask everyone within a 50-foot radius to evacuate while you take a family picture? (Yes, I know, this is extreme, but an example, nonetheless).

I suppose I view this as along the same lines as my "plan for the worst; hope for the best" philosophy. If you are gonna go outside in a bikini (or nothing) and you aren't on your own private property, then don't be offended if someone snaps a picture, gawks, or comments about what is pouring out of your clothing. And IMHO, it's just plain and simple common sense that if you are gonna be outside frollicking either nekkid or in a swimsuit near a bunch of horny guys who haven't seen their wives/girlfriends/palms for a while, they're gonna look and maybe snap a picture (saying of course it's for the squadron MWR photo album ).

 

[huntr1]

Personally, I think they should publish them. I'd buy the magazine. I have a collection different magazines from the last 15 years or so with different famous people in them. I will have to search for that video, just to see what a ditz she is in real life. Kinda like the Pam n Tommy video.

 

[Kain99]

Originally posted by huntr1
I'd buy the magazine. I have a collection different magazines from the last 15 years or so with different famous people in them.

That's a shocker!

 

[huntr1]

Originally posted by Kain99
That's a shocker!

 

[Kain99]

Originally posted by huntr1

No Thanks...

 

[Tonio]

Originally posted by cattitude
She was MADE by the media and the military.

Excellent point. The media, especially cable stations of all political persuasions, love stories about women in jeopardy. Look at Elizabeth Smart and Laci Peterson. Or else it's children in jeopardy like the kids of Andrea Yates and Susan Smith.

 

[metoo]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Is that a fact? Then explain to me why all the 900 # sex chat ads are directed at MEN? You know, the visually stimulated ones?

You're being too literal.
I didn't say "only" or "Solely". I said that they "tend to be".
Women have a TENDENCY to like to be talked to. Men would just as well open a centerfold and place it over their woman's face.

 

[Kizzy]

Kinda like the Pam n Tommy video.

Yep, even some of women took a peak at the video. Tommy has a pretty nice sized tool.

 

[Tonio]

Originally posted by sunnydaze
From People Magazine:
Flynt to Keep Lid on Topless Lynch Pics

With news like this, the jokes just write themselves.

 

[vraiblonde]

Originally posted by metoo
Women have a TENDENCY to like to be talked to. Men would just as well open a centerfold and place it over their woman's face.

That's true enough in some cases but I think it stems more from men's unwillingness to be feminized rather than them being these ethereal "visual" creatures.

If men are so "visual", how come it's always the women that notice the trash needs to be taken out and the carpet needs a vaccuuming?

Think back to caveman days. Men were the hunter/gatherers and women were the nurturers, keeping home and hearth together and raising the next generation. I'll bet no cavewoman ever said, "Hey, Erg, you're not satisfying my emotional needs!" Men tend to think of sex in physical terms, where for a woman it's more emotion-based.

 

[Tonio]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Whatever the story, by all accounts these are action shots and not posed. She apparently didn't even realize her pic was being taken.

I've never understood why some women "flash" in public during Mardi Gras or at the Tiki Bar. If I were a woman, I'd be worried about being pawed and groped by drunken idiots. Wonder why we don't hear about men dropping trou at the Tiki in the hope that women will give them beads?

 

[vraiblonde]

Originally posted by Tonio
I've never understood why some women "flash" in public during Mardi Gras or at the Tiki Bar. If I were a woman, I'd be worried about being pawed and groped by drunken idiots. Wonder why we don't hear about men dropping trou at the Tiki in the hope that women will give them beads?

Because women who flash are "Girls Gone Wild". Men who do it are perverts. :shrug:

 

[Tonio]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Because women who flash are "Girls Gone Wild". Men who do it are perverts. :shrug:

True! I was just trying to deconstruct the rationale behind the double standard.