Hank
my war
I have more ####ing friends then you will ever ####ing have. Now take your stupid ####ing lapdog and shove it up your ####ing ass.
I'm at a loss for words.
- Thread starter afjess1989
- Start date
I have more ####ing friends then you will ever ####ing have. Now take your stupid ####ing lapdog and shove it up your ####ing ass.
I have more ####ing friends then you will ever ####ing have. Now take your stupid ####ing lapdog and shove it up your ####ing ass.
Bitch please. Blow up "friends" don't count.
Hank
my war
Ok. That made me laugh. You ####ing win.
glhs837
Power with Control
Ah, yes, I have advocated going all Frankenstein villager on his place, I remember that. Rational discussion, it's a great thing. I presented their point (the second point of mine you quoted) and then said "If thats true". You read that, right? Now get off your silly outrage over crap I didn't actually advocate, or crap I didn't actually say and answer the damn questions, or is this freakout the best way you can avoid the question? If the dog didn't charge him (because people with felony criminal records never lie to the police, right?) was he in the right to shoot the dog? Simple question, built on the premise that just maybe his story isnt true.
It could very will be he is telling the truth, in which case I say he was justified, or it might not be I recommend letting the legal system handle it, not torches and pitchforks. So, you ready to discuss this or want to attribute more crap I didn't say to me?
Hank
my war
If he is a convicted felon, the illiterate redneck shouldn't even have a gun. What's up with that?
KDENISE977
New Member
Don't you go all making sense on us now... this tread is clearly for us crazys that think it's not okay to kill a dog for accidentally getting loose.
I'm stealing this. You don't mind, do you?
I don't know whether his story is true or not. I am reacting the the villagers, not him. I don't care to play the "well what if.. then what?" game and get wrapped around hypotheticals trying to justify an imaginary position.
Having been charged by rogue dogs before, I know for a fact that it's not outside the realm of possibility. So those who are saying that he is probably lying, you people need some professional help.
Last edited:
Do you know the guy personally? Do you know the dog in question? Were you there when this incident happened?
If not, then you don't know #### about it and are talking out your ass.
So do we have a right to protect ourselves when attacked on our own property, or not?
To me that is the question. Animal freaks are saying no, you do not. That any rogue dog should be able to rip your throat out and slaughter your children, and you are not allowed to harm a hair on its precious little head. Or you should have to wait until *after* you've been attacked and had your throat ripped out or been killed before you can defend yourself.
Found It!!!
Your Fatty Patty Love Doll came with its own FB account?
glhs837
Power with Control
Go right ahead. To me, it's 50/50 if he's lying or not. I don't know him, and normally give at least 75% in favor of the human, but I'm cutting 25% off for the priors. And you, who normally advocates the castration with a dull rusty spoon of anyone who looks at a cop crosswise, all of a sudden think this guy cant tell a lie? That previous post of his looks like a setup to me. I smell a rat, but I'm willing to admit, it might just be that Ridge is close to the water and I'm smelling the swamp
Oh, now look who's jumping up and down like a hyperbolic organ grinder monkey.
FACT: the dog was running loose.
FACT: the dog was on this guy's property when he shot it.
That's it, those are the only pertinent facts that are undisputed. You could bust on him for taking a pic of the dead dog and posting it, and I will agree that was a trash move and in poor taste. But not worth calling the newspapers and police and having such a freak out over.
Last edited:
Hank
my war
It was funny the first time. Don't wear it out...mmmmk
Okay, that'll be the last one.
glhs837
Power with Control
I think the direction the dog was running is pertinent. And that direction is a fact, just one we only have his word on right now, heresay. Like G. Gordon Liddy always said, "Never confuse the police with two stories, make sure you are the only one talking." If the dog was running away, I feel he was wrong to shoot it.
Hank
my war
Fact: It wasn't HIS property.
Fact: You can't shoot guns in a residential neighborhood.
Fact: Convicted felons can't have guns.
Fact: You can't fix stupid.
Last edited:
See, and this is why we don't let you make any decisions.
You can indeed shoot guns in a residential neighborhood. Ask Detroit and DC if you don't believe me.
Convicted felons have guns all the time, so clearly that isn't a fact, either.
Stupid gets fixed every day.
Any other ####ing ignorant remarks you want to make?