Would you stop that...
AndyMarquisLIVE said:
It's a sign that we can wage war with these people. The right leadership and the right special ops can take out any number of unorganized insurg... terrorists.
...it makes my head hurt.
There never was, at least there should not have been, any question about US military domination of any battlefield. That 200 gomers were killed in one place at one time is indicative of how we've chosen to 'fight' this 'war' of late more than any validation of our might and prowess. They, the bad guys, felt safe enough to gather in such numbers. What's that tell you?
This is an insurgency. Insurgents are the water. We are the damn. You can make a damn out of many materials; concrete, chicken, wire, bubble gum, etc. Regardless of the material, the foundation you build the damn on is critical; what are the banks made of? What does the damn rest on? The banks are the surrounding nations and the foundation is the people you are trying to help overcome the insurgency, the Iraqi people.
We have water coming through the banks and we have water flowing under the damn. W has proposed to send over more sandbags to put on the worst leaks; Baghdad.
The questions are;
1. Is the damn reparable? How bad is the erosion on the banks and underneath? Being the US, we can fix anything given our resources, so, a better question is 'is this fixable at a cost we are willing to bare'?
That begats the next question;
2. Is the water receding or building? If it's receding, then maybe the banks and foundations can be repaired and it makes sense to shore up the damn so there's no sudden breach. If the banks and foundation and damn are strong, the water will recede when the storm ebbs.
And so on and so forth.