WWBE...
What Would Buddha Eat??
And if you've ever seen a statue..
ANYTHING within arms reach..
There are many theories and educated explanations but you are correct that it might not have been a perverted act by the son.
Many Buddhists are vegetarians.
Ever ordered "Buddha's Delight" at a chinese restaraunt?
I've heard some monks will not eat animals that were killed specifically for their consumption (roadkill ??? who knows).
but that isn't the question.. It's not what Christians/ Buddhist's eat, but what God/ Buddha ate..
I am saying he ate the "honeycomb" and not the fish.The next verse that you left out proves your statemant false.
BibleGateway.com - Passage#Lookup: Luke 24:33-43;
I am saying he ate the "honeycomb" and not the fish.
And I base it particularly on Genesis 1:29-30 that mankind was created as vegetarians and Jesus never fell short in any way.
If He ate the fish then it would mean Jesus put a piece of violence into Himself.
Therefore He did not eat the fish.
Noah and his children were eating animals before the ark was ever thought of and they all had the same choices a we do today of cleaning our act up or not.
...
The fish is made by God and I agree it can be considered as holy, but killing the fish and eating its carcus is a violent act and violence is not holy.But everything God made is holy. Don't you think if he only ate the honeycomb it would have said that?
God permitting meat eating does not mean He told them to do it.Once again you ignore the important point. Your god told him to eat meat, so if it is a sin in some form, then according to your logic your god commanded Noah to commit sin.
You cannot avoid this with any credibility.
KJVI am saying he ate the "honeycomb" and not the fish.
And I base it particularly on Genesis 1:29-30 that mankind was created as vegetarians and Jesus never fell short in any way.
If He ate the fish then it would mean Jesus put a piece of violence into Himself.
Therefore He did not eat the fish.
God permitting meat eating does not mean He told them to do it.
The time for salvation was not at the Noah time.
Even if God had told them not to eat animals then they were going to do it anyway.
It is just like the ten commandments, and later Jesus giving the sermon on the mount, then nobody or very few obey the commandments or those principles.
This world is not going to be saved until Judgement Day and not now or back then.
The commandments and Jesus teachings and being vegetarian are for those that rise above this wicked world and it is not for those that keep on sinning.
So being like Peter Pan he would eat Never-Food??What God would eat? He's God- he doesn't need to eat.
Who's like Peter Pan? Peter Pan ate Never-Food?So being like Peter Pan he would eat Never-Food??
In the old testiment God told people to do many sinful things like kill all the enemy - men, women and children, and God told them to stone a harlet, eat animal flesh, take an eye for an eye, and much more.YOur god either commanded Noah to go forth and sin ("Everything that lives and moves will be food for you"), said it was ok to sin, or said it was no longer a sin to eat animals. Anything else besides it was never a Chrisitan sin to eat meat does not make sense.
By your logic about eating animals is a sin it has to be this way, your god told Noah to sin, endorsed his sinning, or encouraged his sinning, or all three are true.
So now - now we finally do have an agreement.Thats great that you are willing to see the verses as I do! Seriously, I mean that.
I feel like I responded incorrectly to this post already,Why are you all arguing with JPC? Doesn't that make you feel stupid?
So now - now we finally do have an agreement.
And so are you a devil-ish woman too? like the avatar.