This_person
Well-Known Member
So, a woman claims her estranged husband ran her off the road and sought a protective order. The judge releases the husband on bail with a condition that he not possess any firearms or ammunition.
"Taylor Irby would later tell police that this is when she decided to take matters into her own hands.
While Joseph Irby was still in police custody, she drove to his apartment, got past the locked front door and collected the guns she knew he had, according to police records obtained by the Lakeland Ledger. Then the 32-year-old turned the weapons over to police.
In return, police arrested her."
While Joseph Irby was still in police custody, she drove to his apartment, got past the locked front door and collected the guns she knew he had, according to police records obtained by the Lakeland Ledger. Then the 32-year-old turned the weapons over to police.
In return, police arrested her."
People are up in arms that this poor wittle wady is being improperly treated by her local government because all she did was break and enter and steal, but she gave the guns to the cops so everything is ok, right?
I think she deserves the full weight of the law enforcing not breaking, entering, and grand theft.
What do you think?