During the 2020 presidential campaign, Harris ran to the left of Biden on gun control. While both supported an assault weapons ban, Harris wanted
to force gun owners to sell to the government any firearms that she deemed undesirable. Harris went further than Biden in vowing to use
executive orders if Congress did not pass the ban. The national gun registry makes this mandatory gun confiscation more doable.
Harris pushed for gun control this week in her
first campaign speech as the presumptive Democratic nominee. And she has a long history of pushing for gun control. In early 2008, Harris argued for the constitutionality of gun bans in an
amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court. She claimed there is no individual right to self-defense.
Harris is the Biden administration’s “gun control czar,”
overseeing the administration’s gun control initiatives through the White House’s new
Office of Gun Violence Prevention (OGVP), which coordinates the administration’s gun control efforts. The administration has also just
put out a report failing to recognize any benefits from people owning guns.
The office is credited with
helping to implement the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which introduces long and extremely complicated rules that will
result in many gun owners being defined as firearms dealers. As I’ve previously
pointed out, if you sell a friend a gun once and discuss the sale of a second gun, you must be a licensed dealer. Similarly, if you sell one gun and keep any record of what you bought and sold it for, you must also be a licensed dealer. Other rules are vague and give the government discretion to classify you as a dealer when it sees fit.
Under Harris’s direction, the OGVP is also calling for:
- “Eliminating gun manufacturers’ immunity from liability”
- “Banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines”
- Mandating that people lock up their guns
- Imposing background checks for all gun transfers
Take just the first proposal, which will make gun manufacturers civilly liable for the misuse of guns they sell. This would mean that people can sue manufacturers and sellers whenever a crime, accident, or suicide occurs with a firearm. The straightforward result would be to put gunmakers out of business.
Note that gunmakers can be sued for product malfunctions and sellers are liable for illegal firearms sales (such as for not running a background check). To run afoul of this proposed rule, product makers need not do anything wrong. Car accidents often occur when a driver isn’t paying attention or drives recklessly, perhaps under the influence. It would be ludicrous to make carmakers pay for lost wages, medical costs, and pain and suffering because of a driver’s negligence. Yet that’s what the Biden-Harris administration wants to do with guns.
Gun-control advocates sometimes claim that gunmakers cater to the criminal market with low prices and products that are easily concealable. But lightweight, compact firearms also make life easier for the
21.8 million Americans with concealed handgun permits and the millions more in constitutional carry states who carry without a permit.