Kingzinger Hot Takes And Opinions
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Adam Kinzinger Heads to the Fainting Couch Again
The first clue that Kinzinger holds the moral authority to make this demand is found in his Twitter handle. Notice that Ukrainian flag? Rest assured that any person sporting one of those holds the moral high ground in any situation. Kinzinger takes things a step farther, though, putting the Ukraine flag before the American flag, so you know he’s righteous and good.
Still, despite his obviously unimpeachable credentials, I must disagree with the man who cried during a House hearing and sees MSNBC hits as the pinnacle of intellectual thought. You see, despite his protestations, Republicans don’t have to condemn Trump for daring to go after the DOJ and the FBI lest they be condemned.
Why? Because in America, it’s not “un-American” at all to criticize the federal government. In fact, one of the most un-American things one can do is show blind loyalty to state power. Questioning authority is a quintessentially American ideal. Kinzinger, being the naive, self-indulgent person that he is, seems to be under the impression that one’s loyalty to the nation hinges on lauding the FBI. I would suggest that’s crazy talk.
Kinzinger’s demand is even darker than that, though. It comes from a place of hatred for his fellow countrymen, almost all of which have not actually done anything wrong. He wants to see them brought to heel for no other reason than voting differently than he’d prefer. These people weren’t at the Capitol on January 6th. They just pulled the handle for Trump instead of Biden, and for Kinzinger, that is the truly unforgivable act. Those people must be punished.
Now that’s un-American, is it not?
In addition to having Democrat members of Congress trying to block the electoral count, the electors received death threats. They also faced pressure and efforts to suborn their votes to prevent Trump from being elected. There was even an effort to try to have the intel community push the Russia collusion hoax to the electors, hoping they wouldn’t vote for Trump as a result. Close to 70 Democrats boycotted the inauguration and, of course, there was rioting in the streets of D.C. Sure looks like an “insurrection” to me.
But most of the over 200 people arrested in that rioting had their prosecutions dropped, unlike the Jan. 6 riot.
As we reported earlier, Raskin also sowed “election denialism” about the 2000 election when in 2003, he claimed that the Supreme Court had “thwarted the will of the people” and given the country its first “court-appointed president.” He even pushed the false claim that votes weren’t counted. Not to mention Hillary Clinton is still throwing fits over 2016 and Stacey Abrams claimed she won in Georgia. Democrats have denied election results since at least 2000.
So thank you, Jamie Raskin, for helping us to understand who the real fascists are here.
You know, if the FBI had a pristine record of not catering to political stunts, that would be one thing. But they have a long, storied record of highly unethical behavior and even IN their investigations - decades of what I heard called "managing crime" - being so focused on getting the top criminal in an investigation, they run roughshod and destroy everyone below them. If they're - for example - after some drug lord or mafia kingpin, they're likely to overlook lesser criminals in order to get to their quarry - and often - they still don't get them.
In the pursuance of some criminals - they frequently prove worse than useless, because they make a bad situation worse.
But they have a MUCH WORSE record when it comes to Donald Trump, from spying on him to concocting the entire Russia investigation over a premise they KNEW WAS FALSE FROM THE START. KNOWING it was bullchit means, they were NEVER investigating a crime - only trying to nail him with one.
In the pursuance of some criminals - they frequently prove worse than useless, because they make a bad situation worse.
But they have a MUCH WORSE record when it comes to Donald Trump, from spying on him to concocting the entire Russia investigation over a premise they KNEW WAS FALSE FROM THE START. KNOWING it was bullchit means, they were NEVER investigating a crime - only trying to nail him with one.
The FBI has been finding disaffected whiners onlione then they plant a CI or Multipel CI's to foment a crime
Kinzinger Worried GOP Will Impeach Biden 'Every Week' With a House Majority
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), an anti-Trump RINO who, like Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), sacrificed his career due to an extreme case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), went on record to say that he’s worried that his favorite leader, Joe Biden, will face calls for impeachment on a weekly basis from a GOP-led House.
“Back before we had all the crazies here — just some crazies — you know, every vote we took, we had to somehow defund ObamaCare … you’ll remember, right when we took over it was ‘We need to do the omnibus bill, but we’re not going to vote for it because it doesn’t defund ObamaCare,’” the outgoing congressman said during a CNN interview with David Axelrod.
Kinzinger added, “That’s going to look like child’s play in terms of what [Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.)] is going to demand of [House GOP Leader] Kevin McCarthy [Calif.]. They’re going to demand an impeachment vote on President Biden every week.”
Why yes, Mr. Kinzinger, that’s exactly what will happen, and it will be nothing less than popcorn-worthy entertainment every single week. Hell, we might even get an actual conviction if Republicans win control of the Senate, too.
Reps should not waste their time impeaching Biden unless they can absolutely prove he was on the take from Hunter's shady business dealings. Why bother if you can't get a conviction in the Senate. Reps should take the high road and focus on the economy, the border, and crime.
Just ask him to say his name 5 times really fast without using notes or a teleprompter.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Why would you say that? We have exactly zero examples of impeachment (even with conviction) leading to removal from office. We had one guy step down voluntarily rather than face the impeachment process, but that's not the same.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
His bribing of Ukraine and holding the check until they fired their AG, His associations with his son using his office for profit. These things should be enough for impeachment. IMO h is guilty but has never been tried, Impeachment would bring this evidence to bear and out in the open. If the DOJ will not press it the impeachment could.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
So you didn't actually read my question? I didn't say he had no impeachable offenses. I said why do you think it "one good one should get the job done" when that has literally never been the case before. Even when they had "good ones" noone was removed from office. You can impeach Biden all day long, and even get convictions, and i'm saying it won't amount to removal from office.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
I see your point, and it's a good one. But they did force the removal of Nixon, A Republican.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Nixon wasn't convicted or removed, he stepped down to attempt to salvage his dignity before they aired all the dirty laundry. Most of today's politicians do not have any dignity.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Another good point, but they did get rid of him. And he wasn't all that bad as President.
Adam Kinzinger 'Drunk-Tweets' His Way Into Total Embarassment
McLaughlin’s question is more than fair. What does Putin using conscripts have to do with being pro-life in the United States? The obvious answer is nothing, but Kinzinger, being a man obsessed, must try to tie everything he doesn’t like to his political enemies. It’s a sign of mental weakness from a man who can’t otherwise articulate a comprehensible argument.
That leads to Kinzinger’s response, where he uses the phrase “you all” to accuse pro-life Americans of defending Vladimir Putin. McLaughlin is staunchly pro-Ukraine and has been for as long as I’ve known him. Again, though, the inability to form a coherent argument is the point. Kinzinger is legitimately an idiot, and he’s also a guy who has gotten way too high on his own supply. He can’t fathom that someone might agree with him on Ukraine yet still find his attacks nonsensical so he lashes out like he’s starring in Mean Girls.
At about that point, the replies challenging Kinzinger’s ridiculous assertion started pouring in. Of course, he then decided to push more chips into the middle because he’s incapable of self-reflection and any admission of failure.
Thoroughly defeated, Kinzinger finally moved to do what all too-online reply guys do: He searched for one of McLaughlin’s followers who doesn’t like Ukraine.
Yep… the truth is that @baseballcrank followers fall into line with the “ww3” group. Don’t stand for anything… https://t.co/2FeUVoAtAd
— Adam Kinzinger(@AdamKinzinger) October 2, 2022
