No to Nikki Harris
townhall.com
Yikes. That, my friends, is a burn. And I'm thrilled to finally see someone who is willing to admit what a POS she is.
Yeah, I'll vote for her in the general if the GOP is nuts enough to nominate her...
No to Nikki Harris
townhall.com
Yikes. That, my friends, is a burn. And I'm thrilled to finally see someone who is willing to admit what a POS she is
I'll save reservations until after the debates.
I enjoy watching the debates. I think it gives you an idea as to who means business and who is just going along with the flow. Not so much by the answers to questions but how they answer the question, or how they hold their composure and such. I will also add that I don’t necessarily pick who I vote for from the debates, but I think it gives a good assessment of each individual.This is a real question and not meant as a snark:
What difference do the debates make and how will that help you decide?
I want to see and hear how they react to competition, ideas and line of fire. Even at that some are too stupid to absorb........... see Fetterman. Notice how Harris was KOed?This is a real question and not meant as a snark:
What difference do the debates make and how will that help you decide?
That was painful to read, it sounds exactly like the lefts style of making a point. We'll throw a lot of comparisons to someone we can agree that we don't like and say she's just the same. The only real criticism in the entire thing is that she colluded with John Brennan. The criticism of removing the confederate flag from the state house is only a criticism if what you wanted was to display it for some reason. But Vrai you yourself liked the idea because they are losers. Her time as governor was actually pretty good and even after only serving half of her second term she still has better than 80% of SC republicans would take her back. Her time as UN ambassador may not have been that exciting, but that's actually a good thing.No to Nikki Harris
townhall.com
Yikes. That, my friends, is a burn. And I'm thrilled to finally see someone who is willing to admit what a POS she is.
Translation: I’ll wait until my handlers tell me she’s passed the purity test.I want to see and hear how they react to competition, ideas and line of fire. Even at that some are too stupid to absorb........... see Fetterman. Notice how Harris was KOed?
LOLOLOL this from a idiot Dementia Joe backer?Translation: I’ll wait until my handlers tell me she’s passed the purity test.
Voted for him twice BUT he's almost as old as the pos we have now. Something to consider.So, anyone who's not Trump is quislingweak-kneedpansyRHINO. Sorry, there are good and valid reasons to look elsewhere. Rightfully or not, he's poison in the eyes of many independents and close to center folks in both parties.
This is a real question and not meant as a snark:
What difference do the debates make and how will that help you decide?
I have to disagree with you. They may not help a candidate, but they can surely hurt one. Look back to Nixon-Kennedy, Nixon was the smarter candidate, but he looked like a schmuck with stumbling answers and a ton of flop sweat.If anyone thinks the debates do a goddamn thing they're deluding themselves.
In my ever-so humble opinion, if someone hasn't made up their minds about how they're going to vote by the time the (primary) debates start, they're ****ing retarded, and they should have their right to vote taken away - along with their right (and ability) to reproduce.
The debates are nothing more than a platform for each opponent to embellish their achievements and aggrandize their 'charisma' - assuming they have any. And nothing more than a chance for the media to drive home their narrative. They get to slam everything Trump will say as 'racist' even if he says something that's not even tangentially related to race - and hopefully they'll give Biden a chance to prove that he's marginally more aware and articulate than a half-dried out aubergine.
I have to disagree with you. They may not help a candidate, but they can surely hurt one. Look back to Nixon-Kennedy, Nixon was the smarter candidate, but he looked like a schmuck with stumbling answers and a ton of flop sweat.
It's not working.Translation: I’ll wait until my handlers tell me she’s passed the purity test.
I miss the 60's. Things were so simpler then.Well, I wasn't around in the 60's
The criticism of removing the confederate flag from the state house is only a criticism if what you wanted was to display it for some reason. But Vrai you yourself liked the idea because they are losers.
If anyone thinks the debates do a goddamn thing they're deluding themselves.
In my ever-so humble opinion, if someone hasn't made up their minds about how they're going to vote by the time the (primary) debates start, they're ****ing retarded, and they should have their right to vote taken away - along with their right (and ability) to reproduce.
The debates are nothing more than a platform for each opponent to embellish their achievements and aggrandize their 'charisma' - assuming they have any. And nothing more than a chance for the media to drive home their narrative. They get to slam everything Trump will say as 'racist' even if he says something that's not even tangentially related to race - and hopefully they'll give Biden a chance to prove that he's marginally more aware and articulate than a half-dried out aubergine.
I have to disagree with you. They may not help a candidate, but they can surely hurt one. Look back to Nixon-Kennedy, Nixon was the smarter candidate, but he looked like a schmuck with stumbling answers and a ton of flop sweat.