Uncle Joey was proud of Kyle though. Uncle Joey sez you should shoot an assailant only in the arm or leg and don't "shoot to kill".They don't teach that "Disarming Technique" in PP classes.
Uncle Joey is real smort.
Kyle Rittenhouse Wrongful death suit to proceed
- Thread starter StmarysCity79
- Start date
Uncle Joey is real smort.
Now THAT is a helluva shot if you can make it.....
Hell, theres an area at the top of the leg where both branches of the artery and the vien all run side by side.
Two out of three chance there.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Does a person leaving a hospital usually do so armed? Did you see the way he was dressed and that he had all his meagre possession in a plastic bag?
He was no threat to anyone. The second person tried to disarm Rittenhouse and was also murdered.
What right did Rittenhouse have to act as an authority in that situation? Who's property was he protecting and who asked him to do so?
If he was in such ill health, why go to a riot, set fires, break #### and attack people?
Seems to me he got what he deserved.
Second person wasn't murdered. It was self defense. Jury approved.
glhs837
Power with Control
Do people who just left the hospital usually decide to chase armed people? Who appointed this man rhe person who should go around trying to disarm armed people?
Every time I've left the hospital I took my meager possessions and went the f*** home. You keep ignoring it. The question is to why the hell somebody who got this man out of the hospital then decided a riot was a great place to drop him off.
It's called the right of self defense, you stunningly stupid moron.... He was helping defend private property and then himself. As basic as it gets..
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Who cares? No one deserves to be murdered because they were walking down the street in Kenosha. Rittenhouse killed him for no reason.
At which point a bystander thought he was an active shooter (which he was ) and tried to disarm him.
The fact remains had Rittenhouse not illegally crossed state lines , and act in a role he was not hired or nor qualified for, with a gun he was not legally allowed to own 2 people wouldn't have died.
He should pay for his crime.
And he will
Jury already said otherwise, you brain-dead moron.
black dog
Free America
If I get to shoot someone with a Glock, thats exactly where my first two shots end up.
Then my brain says,,,,, up.up..up....uP
I have the same problem with my M57. I swear I need to put an elevated rear sight on it just for 75 -yard shots. LOL.
It must not have been or SMC79 would know that.
StmarysCity79
Well-Known Member
Pay attention Moron.
We are discussing the civil trial like the headline of the post says.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Considering they didn't charge him with any associated crimes (especially w/ regard to possessing the gun) it will be pretty hard to argue that Kyle breached the defendants duty of care or causation of the loss of life.
If he had the gun illegally or if he was charged with brandishing they might have a case. As the act was considered self defense, and he was within his rights to be in that place with that firearm, this case has no chance.
In my opinion, it's 100% a go-fund-me money grab. Get people riled up to donate, have a quick show trial (or settle out of court) and then retire on the proceeds.
glhs837
Power with Control
Please tell me who was shot "walking down the street". The first guy was chasing him with others in behind him. Not walking, but running after Rittenhouse. That's hospital guy, right? Rosenbaum. He wasnt walking, I showed you that video. Killing that man, who maybe was trying to finish his suicide, which is what he was in the hospital for, BTW doesn't make you an active shooter. Defending yourself by shooting exactly one person does NOT make you an active shooter. Active shooters don't run to the police and ignore targets around them. He shot not one person who was not attacking him. In fact we have video of other people who started to attack him but backed off and he didnt shoot them. So no, he was never an active shooter.
The other people were actively attacking Rittenhouse, we have those videos too. Skateboard to the head? That's a deadly weapon attack. Pulling a pistol, yet another deadly weapon attack.
Illegally crossed state lines? What law prohibits that? Why didn't the state win its case regarding those other issues? Because they are NOT crimes.
You can repeat the same blather over and over, but the facts, backed up by video and a court record say you are wrong. The fact that you need to misstate facts repeatedly and make up stuff like "running away from Rottenhouse" or "walking down the street" instead of accurately describing what the video plainly shows, shows you are wrong.
glhs837
Power with Control
The civil trial doesn't get its own facts, however. It uses the same ones.