Crime LOOTING: Victoria's Secret in Waldorf

BernieP

Resident PIA
You'll get what, a cut of a welfare checK? meanwhile they'll get your house.

Don't forget we are living in a society that hates cops, allows riots, don't care about little girls safety, says men are women and women are men and chalk on the ground makes people feel threatened.. Be a hero in bizzaro world. let us know how that works out for you.

I forgot the :sarcasm: part

Rule one in filing a suit. Either the party you are suing has lots of money or you do. Good luck in getting a lawyer to take your case if neither condition is met.
Which is why these leaches sue corporations, the government and businesses - they have money (or at least insurance).
Then they show up in court looking all kinds of hurt and blame the big, rich, WHITE money bags for their pain and suffering.
 

bilbur

New Member
I'd rather they target big business than anyone.. every minute they are stealing from a big business is every minute they are not stealing from an individual. People are not going to
stop stealing until the likelihood of getting caught is 100% or the penalty isn't worth it if caught. If the public always grabs them at the store, providing free security for VS, then they will
just be burglarizing your house... since the court isn't penalizing them.. I'd rather they have at VS. I don't shop there. VS should just put tags on their clothes or something.

The risks and liabilities aren't worth it.. I value being a father not putting my life at risk and mixing my world in with idiots. Being alive and healthy is my first priority for my kids..
having a theft free shopping mall is relatively unimportant. I don't need a mall at all. I can't tell you how many tens of years it's been that i've shopped in a mall.

I'm sorry what i value as important, is far more practical than your ideals. Let all the idiot lemmings have at the malls for all I care. The mall needs to work on their security, not me, or us. i'm not trying to get shot, stabbed, or cut by a moron, or sued because some idiot got hurt being captured stealing. If this keeps the criminals busy, good. Better big business than an individual. sure maybbe everyone pays a little more.. well everyone who shops at those stores.. i don't.. but yea.. not my problem.

Actually stealing form big business is stealing from everyone that shops in that store. The company isn't going to cut their profits so they mark up everything to cover what has been stolen and what they believe will be stolen in the future. The markup also covers security personnel and security features like RFID readers and alarms. All this stuff would be unnecessary and things would be much cheaper without trash like these 2 women. Could you imagine how cheep things would be if they didn't have to cover the inevitable loss from thieves? The world would be so much better without crooks, thieves, con artist, robbers, etc.. in it. As for these two women, I hope they end up with VD and festering wounds. They don't deserve anything better then that.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
I can imagine how cheap things would be if stores didn't mark up for the "inventory shrinkage".
Go to any "SALE" where there are huge mark downs. They aren't taking a loss to clear out merchandise, they just aren't making as big a profit.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
Well, we do have some common ground then....

I'm pretty conservative, and when i talk to liberals long enough, I find that most people have a lot in common, including end goals, a lot of us might identify problems
differently and seek a different path to the same ultimate end result.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
I forgot the :sarcasm: part

Rule one in filing a suit. Either the party you are suing has lots of money or you do. Good luck in getting a lawyer to take your case if neither condition is met.
Which is why these leaches sue corporations, the government and businesses - they have money (or at least insurance).
Then they show up in court looking all kinds of hurt and blame the big, rich, WHITE money bags for their pain and suffering.


Well I have an umbrella policy so... it might protect me but at the same time qualify me as a target..
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
Actually stealing form big business is stealing from everyone that shops in that store. The company isn't going to cut their profits so they mark up everything to cover what has been stolen and what they believe will be stolen in the future. The markup also covers security personnel and security features like RFID readers and alarms. All this stuff would be unnecessary and things would be much cheaper without trash like these 2 women. Could you imagine how cheep things would be if they didn't have to cover the inevitable loss from thieves? The world would be so much better without crooks, thieves, con artist, robbers, etc.. in it. As for these two women, I hope they end up with VD and festering wounds. They don't deserve anything better then that.

The problem is, it's not stealing from everyone in the store.. it can be argued prices become higher, to which i wouldn't contend, but paying the higher price is a willful act, it's not theft.
the argument stops at "causes goods to be higher priced".


As far as the VD, they probably already have it.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
I can imagine how cheap things would be if stores didn't mark up for the "inventory shrinkage".
Go to any "SALE" where there are huge mark downs. They aren't taking a loss to clear out merchandise, they just aren't making as big a profit.


most.. but i've purchased lots of things that i'm sure were cheaper than they cost to make. Stores do have some cheap clearances sometimes that are at a loss.. but they're probably written off on taxes or something.
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
I'm pretty conservative, and when i talk to liberals long enough, I find that most people have a lot in common, including end goals, a lot of us might identify problems
differently and seek a different path to the same ultimate end result.

That is so true. If people weren't so divided by political parties, or pc, or frivolous/dividing orgs, and other crap that goes on, they would come together as humans, and want the common good for each other. We can thank our gov for the disconnect, and the looney tunes that don't understand they are forming our own destruction. Good post, DM. :smile:
 
Last edited:

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
Not caring about theft because it happens at a "big store" is a slippery slope argument.
1) I don't care because it's at a mall I do not visit.
2) I don't care because it's Wal-Mart and they have plenty of money and I don't shop there.
3) I don't care because it's McKay's I don't shop there.
4) I don't care because it's a mom and pop local store and I don't shop there.
5) I don't care because it's my neighbors house and I don't live there.

Next thing you know, you're living in West Baltimore because you did not care.


I'm very comfortable at drawing the line after #4. If mom and pop are running a store, they are responsible for their own security, financial efficiency, and business model.

If criminals can't be eliminated, i'd rather they be managed and focused on commercial entities... and theft... vs robbery and citizens victimized personally.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
I'm very comfortable at drawing the line after #4. If mom and pop are running a store, they are responsible for their own security, financial efficiency, and business model.

If criminals can't be eliminated, i'd rather they be managed and focused on commercial entities... and theft... vs robbery and citizens victimized personally.

This has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Empowering criminals over stores and store owners? Better they steal here than from there? Are they any less or more a criminal, depending on who or where they steal from?
 

littlelady

God bless the USA
This has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Empowering criminals over stores and store owners? Better they steal here than from there? Are they any less or more a criminal, depending on who or where they steal from?

It is not so much about empowering criminals. It is about what do civilians do to put themselves in harms way. I would help someone that is being beat up or threatened in some way. But, these gals are another story. Brazen isn't even a good enough word to describe what they did. Sad.

And, now these gals are being linked to other thefts.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
I'm very comfortable at drawing the line after #4. If mom and pop are running a store, they are responsible for their own security, financial efficiency, and business model.

If criminals can't be eliminated, i'd rather they be managed and focused on commercial entities... and theft... vs robbery and citizens victimized personally.

This has to rank high on the list of ill informed, asinine posts, of all time.
Wrong on some many points.
Short form answer, you are an idiot.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
This has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Empowering criminals over stores and store owners? Better they steal here than from there? Are they any less or more a criminal, depending on who or where they steal from?

Wrong it's not about the way you read it. I'm not sayin the stores should allow it.. it's the stores job to secure their own merchandise.. I certain am not going to introduce physical force into the situation. You can try to stop those hoodrats if you want to.. hope your face doesn't get sliced open with a razor.. for what? trying to play cop or hero? i'll save my heroism for people in need. I've got a family that i'm ensuring to be present to provide for, we've got video cameras, we've go a system that has a warrant system for people.. it's not the end of the world to not get personally involved with some hoodrats doing hoodrat things when our system will apprehend them eventually. Now if they were attackign some innocent person, they might themselves hurting from pepper spray or a cracked skull.. or even if there were someoen suspicious in my neighbors yard they would be addressed... not knowing i'm prepared to defend myself to the ultimate extremes... but it's just not the slippery slope to the end of society to let a wealthy entity secure it's own products and let our legal system do what it's designed to do. I do not let robbers rob me, because it might encourage their behavior to harm others... but VS secret crappy chinese imports? no.. i could care less.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
Please explain why you disagree. Thanks.

If you don't understand that we all pay for loss do to theft, then you need to stand in the special line with him for the mentally impaired.
Not only do you smell bad, but you're a dumb as a bag of rocks.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
Please explain why you disagree. Thanks.

I know you were replying to berniep, but His rude, juvenile, disrespectful, reply already said so much about how his mind works, i'm surprised anyone would have any interest to hear anything further. I'll just say I don't think he's as decent a chess player as I am, and leave it at that.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
If you don't understand that we all pay for loss do to theft, then you need to stand in the special line with him for the mentally impaired.
Not only do you smell bad, but you're a dumb as a bag of rocks.

Have you had a few drinks tonight? You're not really this illiterate are you? As for losses and paying for thefts, i'm sure that they sell tens of thousands for every unit stolen. I'm very pro big corporations. I'm very pro being rich and wealthy. I'm against libtards who are anti business and such.. but i just don't think that the theft of VS junk is driving us or anyone to the poor house. They'd probably throw the same garments in the trash and think nothing of it, if they were customer returns.
 
Last edited:
Top