Maryland about to lose it's nuts?

Novus Collectus

Novus Collectus

New Member
pcjohnnyb said:
your view on quite a few topics simply sucks :shrug:

you go from saying that these things should be illegal and banned, to complaining because there are too many whiny people causing laws (like the one you just proposed) to be put into effect, to going back and saying that the things should be banned.

I can feel confident that you feel your cigs should be legal to be smoked wherever you want. If you want things like this to be legal, then why would you try to take away the rights of a dumb ass who wants some balls hanging off his truck? Its his right to have those things dangling (or should be his right). If he wants to be a tard, let him. If you want to inhale various toxins, thats fine too :shrug:.

Lets either

A. Stop b******* and moaning about every little thing and keep our rights to do various things that really aren't hurting anyone...

OR

B. Ban every thing that is either offensive, possibly harmful, ect. because there is no way everyone is going to be satisfied by just banning X thing or Y thing...


lets grow up people. are these things really hurting anything?
Click to expand...
Good points.
 
vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Novus Collectus said:
The word "matter" does not get mentioned in "partially nude figure". If you realized that the definitions section of a subarticle specifically defines words and expressions to be used in a subsection or article (not the title, but the words USED in the sub article or article) you would know that "matter" is not "partially nude figure" or included in it.
It shows that "partially nude figure" is NOT a statue becuse if it included a statue it would either say "statue" or "matter".
Click to expand...

Save your horse#### for the court system. I, unlike apparently YOU, do not need to have the word "matter" legally defined for me.
 
theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
vraiblonde said:
Save your horse#### for the court system. I, unlike apparently YOU, do not need to have the word "matter" legally defined for me.
Click to expand...

you sure?

Definitions of matter on the Web:

substance: that which has mass and occupies space; "an atom is the smallest indivisible unit of matter"

a vaguely specified concern; "several matters to attend to"; "it is none of your affair"; "things are going well"

topic: some situation or event that is thought about; "he kept drifting off the topic"; "he had been thinking about the subject for several years"; "it is a matter for the police"
a problem; "is anything the matter?"
(used with negation) having consequence; "they were friends and it was no matter who won the games"
written works (especially in books or magazines); "he always took some reading matter with him on the plane"

count: have weight; have import, carry weight; "It does not matter much"
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Click to expand...

those definitions are pretty varied in subject and application... :whistle:
 
Novus Collectus

Novus Collectus

New Member
vraiblonde said:
Save your horse#### for the court system. I, unlike apparently YOU, do not need to have the word "matter" legally defined for me.
Click to expand...
If I am wrong and you he is right that "partially nude figure" included statues, then there would be no need for a new law banning the balls now then would there?

If MD passes a law saying that the depiction of sculpted testicles is illegal and obscene, then I am going to go out to buy a truck, a set of hanging testicles and call them the balls of Jesus and claim religious free expression or that it is a political protest which are both protected under the First Amendment and more than art is.
 
bcp

bcp

In My Opinion
vraiblonde said:
Oh horse####. I have avoided two people that I can think of that tried to kill me and probably weren't wearing their seatbelt. (Because reckless drivers aren't concerned about such things.)

So had you spun out in front of me, I'd have likely avoided you. I'm a 360 degree driver and see you coming :yay: And those who aren't, shouldn't be driving. mAlice avoided two deer that literally came out of nowhere and would have killed us in her little Beemer, PLUS managed to not get rear-ended by the truck that was right on her ass.

She, as well, is a 360 degree driver. So I'm not buying your argument.
Click to expand...
I think that first we need to define the legal meaning of the word argument, and we should also have some sort of finding from P.E.T.A as to the legal right of the deer to be in the road vs the right of the beemer..
 
U

UltimateHater07

New Member
see, i own a 00 explorer and i bought a set of truck nuts for the hitch. i understand some people think its public nudity, but is it any different seeing a dog walkin around that has his nuts? they say its a distraction to motorists but if thats the case then all bumper stickers and car decals and rims and so on should all be illegal. I think its stupid for them to make it illegal. We're known as land of the free, but yet we have more and more restrictions. I pay my money for my vehicles each month, i should be able to put whatever i want on it.
 
MMDad

MMDad

Lem Putt
UltimateHater07 said:
see, i own a 00 explorer and i bought a set of truck nuts for the hitch.
Click to expand...
I want to personally thank you. If you didn't have those on your hitch, I might mistake you for a normal person. But now you have given me a visual indication that you are a brain dead, ignorant, rude, disgusting, sister boinking, inbred moron. And you are proud of it.

It's kind of like a tatoo for gang members. They wear a MS-13 tatoo, and the doofus gang has balls on their hitch.
 
H

hammishsqueak

We're all mad here.
Speaking of unusual car "decorations" causing distractions...

Has anyone seen this one truck/van driving in the Lusby/Solomon's Island area that has "bloody" doll about the size of a small child on the front grill area (I believe). I see it every once in a blue moon, but I always end up doing a double-take.
 
Pete

Pete

Repete
hammishsqueak said:
Speaking of unusual car "decorations" causing distractions...

Has anyone seen this one truck/van driving in the Lusby/Solomon's Island area that has "bloody" doll about the size of a small child on the front grill area (I believe). I see it every once in a blue moon, but I always end up doing a double-take.
Click to expand...

No but there is a old Ford Ranger around with a bunch of spray paint graffiti on it and across the tailgate is says "Honk if you aren't wearing panties"
 
H

hammishsqueak

We're all mad here.
Pete said:
No but there is a old Ford Ranger around with a bunch of spray paint graffiti on it and across the tailgate is says "Honk if you aren't wearing panties"
Click to expand...

:lmao: I'd honk. :shrug:

There is also a guy in a black pick up (St. Mary's) who has his car covered with anti-Bush reading material. I don't care what political opinion you have--you look obsessed when you have your car covered like that! I have to commend him on his bravery, however. People must try to mess with him all the time :ohwell: I prefer to lay low...
 
Dougstermd

Dougstermd

ORGASM DONOR
vraiblonde said:
Actually, it probably never occurred to them that some redneck would want to hang balls on his vehicle, then insist it is protected by the First Amendment.

One is art; the other is for prurient gratification. It would take a special kind of tard to make the case that balls hanging off a truck bumper is art.
Click to expand...

I am sure they had balls dangleing fron the first covered wagon trains:smack:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top