I mean, I really should just take this one at a time.
"I'm tired of places like Alabama controlling our country."
Aside from the fact that that is utterly stupid, what, should New York or California "control" the country?
"I mean Canada is more progressive then American's."
Your point being? What, being "progressive" is automatically preferable? Hardly. They have no military to speak of - they depend on US to do it for them. (Their military is about the size of the NYPD). Their health care system is dreadful if you are seriously ill. They tax their people practically to death. Forget constitutional rights - they have no constitution. And it's the most PC nation on the planet. But hey, if that's your bag, please, go MOVE there. Why change the US when you can just move your OWN azz up north?
"It should be the other way around since we are the "richest" and most powerful country on the planet."
I haven't the faintest idea where the logic of this statement comes from. It's not only a non-sequitur, it doesn't even stand on its own as a logical statement.
"Backwoods stick people shouldn't control our country."
Still don't know where it comes from, but - I have a guess. You think that persons who live in rural areas are "backwoods stick people" right? You mean, like Southern Maryland, which went for Bush last time?
"It should be whoever wins the popular vote is President."
Well, then change the Constitution nitwit. That's the law. Don't like it? Change it. But don't darken my sky with your sob story about how unfair it is. It's the law.
Winning only the electoral vote has happened 4 times.
