Then how are we explaining the exponential surge in the sparsely populated midwest?
The language of that article is fairly ambiguous/alarmist. "Pummeling" "Midwest" "Skyrocketed"
Illinois, which contains Chicago (9 million metro), and Michigan, which contains Detroit (4 million metro), are considered the "midwest". Not a sparse population, and the article indicates those cities are the covid hubs. Heck, even Sioux Falls, SD has almost a million people.
A "spike" in a small city like Lincoln, NE could mean they went from 1 case to 5. If they went from 1 case to 2 cases, "reporters" could legitimately say cases" doubled", which sounds ominous indeed.
A "record" only means it's the highest it's ever been. If they had 2 cases, 3 cases would be a "record high".
This statement:
There are more patients currently hospitalized in the Midwest than in the West and Northeast combined, driven mostly by Illinois and Michigan.
simply cannot be true because of math. The West and Northeast include New York and California, so even if you take the cities of Detroit and Chicago into consideration that sentence cannot possibly be correct.
The article appears to want me to think Broken Bow, NE and Pella, IA are being decimated by covid, which is why the author uses that vague language and alarming verbs. And then he shows his elitist NYC bias by presuming that "midwest" hospitals are small and "widely dispersed". Perhaps he's never actually been to Chicago or Kansas City or Indianapolis and thinks everyone there lives on a farm.
I hate to give Google any props but they do a pretty good job of breaking down the rona.
You can see stats for the whole US or specific states, both cases and deaths, and then get a county breakdown as well, and even do a "per 1 million residents". Interesting stuff.