MD approves yapping on Cell Phone Ban when driving

chernmax

NOT Politically Correct!!
About freakin time!!!

Md. Senate Passes Cell Phone Ban For Drivers
Reporting
Pat Warren ANNAPOLIS, Md. (WJZ/AP) ―
A cell phone driving ban that has been rejected many times by Maryland lawmakers -- as recently as last week -- is alive again and headed for approval in the Maryland Senate.

But it's still unclear whether this is the year for Maryland to join Washington, D.C., and other jurisdictions that don't allow drivers to hold phones while driving.

The ban, approved on a preliminary 25-22 vote Tuesday, would also prohibit text messaging while driving. It would be a secondary offense -- meaning a police officer could not pull over drivers simply for talking on cell phones -- and would expire in two years unless lawmakers renew it.

The ban was revived in the Senate Tuesday as the chamber changed its mind and undid an amendment they approved last week to remove the bill's ban on talking while driving, leaving just a text messaging ban. That amendment was approved by a single vote, but some senators said they didn't understand that amendment and wanted another crack at it, a legislative maneuver that gives lawmakers a sort of "do-over."

The second time around, senators decided not to take out the handheld phone prohibition. After voting to reject that amendment, the chamber forwarded the ban to a final vote in coming days. If approved, it would be the first time a cell phone driving ban has cleared a chamber of the Maryland legislature, though questions persist on whether the House will agree to the ban if the Senate sends it there.

"It's an important debate we have going on here," said Delegate Maggie McIntosh, a Baltimore Democrat who committee has twice rejected texting-while-driving bans this year. McIntosh said it's too soon to tell whether the Senate's bill would succeed or fail in the House.

McIntosh said she supports the idea of a cell phone driving ban -- but she added, "there has not traditionally been support in my committee" for a ban.

Back in the Senate, the ban was passed after a short debate, though one more vote is required. The bill has been changed from its original version to make it more palatable to critics. In addition to the expiration date, senators approved an amendment allowing judges to waive fines for drivers who can prove they bought handsfree accessories after getting ticketed for talking on the phone.

The Senate rejected an amendment Tuesday that would have also banned use of global positioning systems and another to exempt the Eastern Shore counties from the ban.

A final vote on the measure is expected by the end of the week. "I think we've got a fair shot. I really do," said the ban's sponsor, Sen. Michael Lennett, D-Montgomery. He conceded the ban has been considered for many years without success, but Lennett said he senses there are enough backers now to move a ban to the governor's desk.

"It's just one of those bills, like the seat belt law, that just takes time," Lennett said.

During the debate Tuesday, senators cited the ban's success in neighboring Washington, D.C., and argued the ban will be enough to get people off the phone while driving.

"In Washington, D.C., we know that driving on a cell phone will get you a ticket, and people have stopped doing it," said Sen. Catherine Pugh, D-Baltimore.

But some wonder whether the House will agree to a driving ban. AAA Mid-Atlantic has not taken a position on whether handheld cell phone use should be banned -- though it favors a text-message ban -- and even a prominent supporter in the Senate says he doesn't know whether it can succeed in the House.

"I hope they'll regard this as a more comprehensive bill," said Sen. Norman Stone, D-Baltimore County, "but that may be wishful thinking."
 

Go G-Men

New Member
About freakin time!!!

Md. Senate Passes Cell Phone Ban For Drivers
Reporting
Pat Warren ANNAPOLIS, Md. (WJZ/AP) ―
A cell phone driving ban that has been rejected many times by Maryland lawmakers -- as recently as last week -- is alive again and headed for approval in the Maryland Senate.

But it's still unclear whether this is the year for Maryland to join Washington, D.C., and other jurisdictions that don't allow drivers to hold phones while driving.

The ban, approved on a preliminary 25-22 vote Tuesday, would also prohibit text messaging while driving. It would be a secondary offense -- meaning a police officer could not pull over drivers simply for talking on cell phones -- and would expire in two years unless lawmakers renew it.

The ban was revived in the Senate Tuesday as the chamber changed its mind and undid an amendment they approved last week to remove the bill's ban on talking while driving, leaving just a text messaging ban. That amendment was approved by a single vote, but some senators said they didn't understand that amendment and wanted another crack at it, a legislative maneuver that gives lawmakers a sort of "do-over."

The second time around, senators decided not to take out the handheld phone prohibition. After voting to reject that amendment, the chamber forwarded the ban to a final vote in coming days. If approved, it would be the first time a cell phone driving ban has cleared a chamber of the Maryland legislature, though questions persist on whether the House will agree to the ban if the Senate sends it there.

"It's an important debate we have going on here," said Delegate Maggie McIntosh, a Baltimore Democrat who committee has twice rejected texting-while-driving bans this year. McIntosh said it's too soon to tell whether the Senate's bill would succeed or fail in the House.

McIntosh said she supports the idea of a cell phone driving ban -- but she added, "there has not traditionally been support in my committee" for a ban.

Back in the Senate, the ban was passed after a short debate, though one more vote is required. The bill has been changed from its original version to make it more palatable to critics. In addition to the expiration date, senators approved an amendment allowing judges to waive fines for drivers who can prove they bought handsfree accessories after getting ticketed for talking on the phone.

The Senate rejected an amendment Tuesday that would have also banned use of global positioning systems and another to exempt the Eastern Shore counties from the ban.

A final vote on the measure is expected by the end of the week. "I think we've got a fair shot. I really do," said the ban's sponsor, Sen. Michael Lennett, D-Montgomery. He conceded the ban has been considered for many years without success, but Lennett said he senses there are enough backers now to move a ban to the governor's desk.

"It's just one of those bills, like the seat belt law, that just takes time," Lennett said.

During the debate Tuesday, senators cited the ban's success in neighboring Washington, D.C., and argued the ban will be enough to get people off the phone while driving.

"In Washington, D.C., we know that driving on a cell phone will get you a ticket, and people have stopped doing it," said Sen. Catherine Pugh, D-Baltimore.

But some wonder whether the House will agree to a driving ban. AAA Mid-Atlantic has not taken a position on whether handheld cell phone use should be banned -- though it favors a text-message ban -- and even a prominent supporter in the Senate says he doesn't know whether it can succeed in the House.

"I hope they'll regard this as a more comprehensive bill," said Sen. Norman Stone, D-Baltimore County, "but that may be wishful thinking."

This is a revenue tool and that is all. The money will be collected and used by MOM and his buddies to support ill advised programs, most likely in Baltimore...
 

kom526

They call me ... Sarcasmo
The Senate rejected an amendment Tuesday that would have also banned use of global positioning systems and another to exempt the Eastern Shore counties from the ban.

Why? What would banning GPS do?





During the debate Tuesday, senators cited the ban's success in neighboring Washington, D.C., and argued the ban will be enough to get people off the phone while driving. "In Washington, D.C., we know that driving on a cell phone will get you a ticket, and people have stopped doing it," said Sen. Catherine Pugh, D-Baltimore.

I'd like to see her data on how successful this is in DC.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
I am...

To all you cellphone yakkers who applauded the smoking ban:

HA HA!!!

...OUTRAGED!!!! What next? No playing with the stereo while driving, huh? No more eating or drinking? No more reading the newspaper? No personal grooming? Where are MY rights? How about smoking, hmm???

FASCISTS!
 

bcp

In My Opinion
when does this start?
I hope before I leave this morning.


I have weaned myself from my cell phone, Im over it.
when our family plan contract comes up in june, Im not renewing my number, only pan lady's and skillet girls phones will be left.
 
W

White Buddah

Guest
I really don't like the fact they had to make a law for people to stop doing something dangerous. I know there are quite a few mixed emotions out there on this subject. But people being to stubborn to NOT talk on the phone when driving brought it to this. A buddy of mine almost hit me in the parking lot cause he wasn't paying attention to what was in front of him but knew exactly what the conversation over the phone was about. The expression on his face was all terror as the tires locked up. Are they going to cite the cops for talking on their phones while driving too????? Right.
Boo hoo if you get a ticket for breaking the law. Mom has done it again!!
 

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
The ban, approved on a preliminary 25-22 vote Tuesday, would also prohibit text messaging while driving. It would be a secondary offense -- meaning a police officer could not pull over drivers simply for talking on cell phones -- and would expire in two years unless lawmakers renew it.

Can you still text message???:faint:

That's the only thing they banned.
It's still legal to shield your vision on one side of your face while attempting to control 3 tons of steel moving at high velocity.
Another do nothing feel good law from your mommy in Annapolis :bigwhoop:
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
Another do nothing feel good law from your mommy in Annapolis :bigwhoop:

:yeahthat: Eating, applying makeup, shaving, reading a map, reading a paper, watching a movie, typing on your laptop..... all still legal.

Why ban cellphone use? What does it prevent?

So someone is distracted. What do they do?

Fail to stay in a lane? Already illegal.

Go too fast? Already illegal.

Go too slow? Already illegal.

Run red lights and stop signs? Already illegal.

Rear end another car? Already illegal.

Since this is a secondary offense, it adds a small fine to the higher fine you would already be getting. No points, which is what really matters to most of us. Great job.

This is exactly like the gun ban in DC. Does adding a firearms charge on top of first degree murder deter anything? You get life, plus another 5 years. What a great idea.

And for the record, I have completely hands free voice activated in my car. This law does not affect me, I just hate feel good nanny laws that do nothing.
 
:shrug: What's the big deal anyway? I love my hands free. Touch one button and SPEAK to dial. Your eyes never leave the road, I never feel distracted. I'd use my hands free whether there was a ban or not.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I'm shocked that some of you would endanger the lives of others simply because you can't even drive your car without yapping on the phone. There is no reason on earth why someone NEEDS to talk on the phone while driving. You can pull over or wait until you get to your destination.

It's selfish cellphone yappers that cause accidents and kill people. If there were a cellphone-free road that the rest of us could drive on to be safe from you, it would be one thing.

:drama:

HA HA!!!! :killingme :roflmao:
 
I'm shocked that some of you would endanger the lives of others simply because you can't even drive your car without yapping on the phone. There is no reason on earth why someone NEEDS to talk on the phone while driving. You can pull over or wait until you get to your destination.

It's selfish cellphone yappers that cause accidents and kill people. If there were a cellphone-free road that the rest of us could drive on to be safe from you, it would be one thing.

:drama:

HA HA!!!! :killingme :roflmao:

You're getting a real kick out of this, ain'tcha ? :lmao:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
You're getting a real kick out of this, ain'tcha ? :lmao:

You have no idea :roflmao:

When they did the smoking ban, I said just wait until they want to ban something from you, then maybe you'll see what the problem is with letting government have too much power. And the smoke Nazis said, "That will NEVER happen because I NEVER do anything that's bad enough to EVER get banned!"

HA HA!!!! :lmao:
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
It's selfish cellphone yappers that cause accidents and kill people. If there were a cellphone-free road that the rest of us could drive on to be safe from you, it would be one thing.

:drama:

HA HA!!!! :killingme :roflmao:



It is not the Yapping, for most, but taking your eyes off of the road to dial you call ..... but it all boils down to distracted driving .... eating, applying makeup, fiddling with the radio .....


:doh:
hehehe I used to do Yahoo Msgr on my crackberry sitting in rush hr traffic on Rt 7 .... :whistle:
 

Cyurius

New Member
OOh, goody. Now we non-smoking cellphone yappers can start 5 billion threads biatching and moaning about how it's unconstitutional. Maybe we can turn every political argument thread into a thread about how unfaaaiiiiiirrr it is that we can't do something. :drama:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
OOh, goody. Now we non-smoking cellphone yappers can start 5 billion threads biatching and moaning about how it's unconstitutional. Maybe we can turn every political argument thread into a thread about how unfaaaiiiiiirrr it is that we can't do something. :drama:

HA HA!!!!! :killingme
 
Top