Miley Cyrus Topless In Vanity Fair................

MMDad

Lem Putt
Nothing came between Brooke and her Calvin's when she was 15. I think it sucked then as much as it sucks now but, is nothing new.

True. And the pictures of her were far more revealing. Pretty Baby and Blue Lagoon were almost pornographic.
 
Please tell the jackass that Wal*Fart sucks. They have like 30 cash registers and I have never seen anymore than 8 open on weekends. I was in there a few weeks ago on a weekday evening and there were only 3 lines open. Unfortunately, I have to shop there for certain things. :ohwell:

Next time you need to go to Walkn'-Martz - call me, we will go through the "help yourself line" - I'll check you out! :hot:

:lol:
 

Giantone

New Member
All of you need a life, so many people want her to fail just so they can say I told you so.Kids show way more at the beach or pool....this doesn't deserve a thread.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
All of you need a life, so many people want her to fail just so they can say I told you so.Kids show way more at the beach or pool....this doesn't deserve a thread.

I like Miley Cyrus. My daughter loves her. I don't have a problem with that. :shrug:
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
All of you need a life, so many people want her to fail just so they can say I told you so.Kids show way more at the beach or pool....this doesn't deserve a thread.

I go to the beach I expect bikinis and such. When my 7 year old sees Miley mostly naked on the cover of a magazine in (I wont use WalMart) Target after they have seen this wholesome, well-rounded girl perform on stage, that's quite different.

You have to ask yourself what sort of message she was actually trying to convey here. Was it just some innocent little "wouldn't be fun to have my half naked body photographed and plastered all over the newsstands"? What was her purpose?
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
I go to the beach I expect bikinis and such. When my 7 year old sees Miley mostly naked on the cover of a magazine in (I wont use WalMart) Target after they have seen this wholesome, well-rounded girl perform on stage, that's quite different.

You have to ask yourself what sort of message she was actually trying to convey here. Was it just some innocent little "wouldn't be fun to have my half naked body photographed and plastered all over the newsstands"? What was her purpose?
But, Miley Cyrus says she did not know these pictures were being taken at that time. :bs:

This isn't her first controversey, and it's not going to be the last. BIG MISTAKE, but nothing more, by Miley. There are A LOT of people in the media who want her to fail.

And don't forget Disney had the whole Vanessa Anne mess. They kept her. :crazy:

This doesn't end here.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
I don't think Annie Leibovitz intended for this to be a sex image either. She's not, by any means, a raunchy photographer.

Sex sells. It's just a shame Vanity Fair is exploiting underage individuals to sell magazines.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
I agree with Annie Leibovitz, this very controversial picture is going to be forever etched into entertainment history. Miley Cyrus is, by far, the biggest celebirty right now. She's the biggest thing for Disney since Mickey Mouse. It's an instant classic, although for the wrong reasons, now. :shrug:
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
But, Miley Cyrus says she did not know these pictures were being taken at that time. :bs:

This isn't her first controversey, and it's not going to be the last. BIG MISTAKE, but nothing more, by Miley. There are A LOT of people in the media who want her to fail.

And don't forget Disney had the whole Vanessa Anne mess. They kept her. :crazy:

This doesn't end here.

Don't get me wrong, I have no expectations from these hollywood types. They live in a closed world that makes them feel exempt from the rest of world. They are clueless...

That is until they're called out on it. Then it's "I'm so sorry" and off to rehab.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
And now, my fine friends from all age groups and all political spectrums, let the games ... begin. :jerry:



VanityFair said:
Sweet niblets, Annie Leibovitz’s photographs of Miley Cyrus sure have caused a stir. One financial blogger even went so far as to speculate that Disney’s stock could take a hit, now that “its $1 billion Miley Cyrus franchise is at risk thanks to the June 2008 cover of Vanity Fair.” Cyrus isn’t actually on the cover, but we catch the drift. Except that, as this exclusive video shows, the nefarious photo shoot that has parents threatening to host Hannah Montana bonfire parties was actually a relaxed family event in one of the most picturesque settings imaginable: the green hills of Calabasas, California. Check it out!

See also: Leibovitz’s final images and Bruce Handy’s article “Miley Knows Best,” as well as our slide show of candid images from the shoot.
 

Pete

Repete
I don't think Annie Leibovitz intended for this to be a sex image either. She's not, by any means, a raunchy photographer.

Sex sells. It's just a shame Vanity Fair is exploiting underage individuals to sell magazines.

Exploiting her? Why can't Vanity Fair get their cut? I mean the Cyrus gang and Disney are whoring the kid out for everything from Hannah Montana bubblegum to Miley Cyrus Mini Pads. Lunch boxes, pencils, backpacks, shoes, shirts, underwear, stickers, ice cream, videos, movies, concerts, nail polish, cell phone skins, peanut butter, you name it her prepubescent mug is all over everything. She had her crew are turning into "fame tards" of the nth degree. The day after her 16th birthday she should stop wearing panties and start flashing her beave for the photogs, it's about the only thing they haven't done yet.
 
Top