Sula
WDF. So worth the wait.
Nothing came between Brooke and her Calvin's when she was 15. I think it sucked then as much as it sucks now but, is nothing new.
Nothing came between Brooke and her Calvin's when she was 15. I think it sucked then as much as it sucks now but, is nothing new.
Nothing came between Brooke and her Calvin's when she was 15. I think it sucked then as much as it sucks now but, is nothing new.
Nothing came between Brooke and her Calvin's when she was 15. I think it sucked then as much as it sucks now but, is nothing new.
Please tell the jackass that Wal*Fart sucks. They have like 30 cash registers and I have never seen anymore than 8 open on weekends. I was in there a few weeks ago on a weekday evening and there were only 3 lines open. Unfortunately, I have to shop there for certain things.
True. And the pictures of her were far more revealing. Pretty Baby and Blue Lagoon were almost pornographic.
Let us not forget Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver. She was what, 14?
Kind of makes seeing Miley's back seem like it's not really an issue, doesn't it?
All of you need a life, so many people want her to fail just so they can say I told you so.Kids show way more at the beach or pool....this doesn't deserve a thread.
All of you need a life, so many people want her to fail just so they can say I told you so.Kids show way more at the beach or pool....this doesn't deserve a thread.
But, Miley Cyrus says she did not know these pictures were being taken at that time.I go to the beach I expect bikinis and such. When my 7 year old sees Miley mostly naked on the cover of a magazine in (I wont use WalMart) Target after they have seen this wholesome, well-rounded girl perform on stage, that's quite different.
You have to ask yourself what sort of message she was actually trying to convey here. Was it just some innocent little "wouldn't be fun to have my half naked body photographed and plastered all over the newsstands"? What was her purpose?
And don't forget Disney had the whole Vanessa Anne mess. They kept her.
19, apparently.Isn't she 18?
19, apparently.
But, Miley Cyrus says she did not know these pictures were being taken at that time.
This isn't her first controversey, and it's not going to be the last. BIG MISTAKE, but nothing more, by Miley. There are A LOT of people in the media who want her to fail.
And don't forget Disney had the whole Vanessa Anne mess. They kept her.
This doesn't end here.
VanityFair said:Sweet niblets, Annie Leibovitz’s photographs of Miley Cyrus sure have caused a stir. One financial blogger even went so far as to speculate that Disney’s stock could take a hit, now that “its $1 billion Miley Cyrus franchise is at risk thanks to the June 2008 cover of Vanity Fair.” Cyrus isn’t actually on the cover, but we catch the drift. Except that, as this exclusive video shows, the nefarious photo shoot that has parents threatening to host Hannah Montana bonfire parties was actually a relaxed family event in one of the most picturesque settings imaginable: the green hills of Calabasas, California. Check it out!
See also: Leibovitz’s final images and Bruce Handy’s article “Miley Knows Best,” as well as our slide show of candid images from the shoot.
I don't think Annie Leibovitz intended for this to be a sex image either. She's not, by any means, a raunchy photographer.
Sex sells. It's just a shame Vanity Fair is exploiting underage individuals to sell magazines.