But what would/should be defined as a "minimal safety inspection"?
I think officeguy's post is pretty accurate, i would throw in exhaust system to this list, not sure what year they started with catalytic converters. I personally would not drive an unsafe vehicle, and am currently looking at an older vehicle to purchase, mid 90's.
Quote Originally Posted by officeguy View Post
The idiocy of the Maryland inspection regime is baffling to start with. You have to get it inspected when you buy it but after that, nobody cares.
I wish the inspection was less comprehensive but more frequent. The old NY upstate inspection worked like that:
Brakes: Present
Brake-lights: work
Tires: not completely bald
Headlights: work
Parking Brake: Works
Cathalytic converter: Present
The price was fixed at $7 and because it was so limited in scope, there was little opportunity for the shops to fleece owners the way the MD inspection shops do.
That's the big one. The emissions test on older cars is a joke anyways. Pre OBD-2 cars can't really tested without a roller test stand and they did away with those 10 years ago.
I don't have a problem with cops now being able to put repair orders on unsafe 'historic' vehicles. No well maintained collector car will have difficulties passing a roadside inspection. They are not measuring your brake rotors with a micrometer, they check weather you have tread on the tires and whether you lights work. There is no reason why a 'historic' car has to be in bad maintenance condition.
In my experience, if you have a nice collector car and you don't drive like an idiot, all you get is a thumbs-up from the cops.