SamSpade
Well-Known Member
It's a logical fallacy. For one, saying "there are more important things to..." means that one presumes to suggest that their list of what's important and the other person's list of what's important are precisely the same. Secondly, even if there is agreement that "there are other things which are more important..." doesn't mean both can't get worked on at the same time.
It's an oft-repeated statement, and as soon as I see it I generally tune out the rest. It happens a lot here on these forums.
I'd say it happens just about everywhere. I don't think I saw a single panel discussing this issue - or one spokesman for a team or franchise that did NOT say this.
I generally see it as a dodge for someone who is either ill-prepared or unwilling to discuss it or has an opinion on it they'd rather not divulge.
But I have to agree your analysis of it is spot on. While some think the nuclear threat from North Korea is the most important issue, others may see climate change as more pressing.
Some of my more religious friends see eternal salvation as more important than both. It does have to do with everyone's priorities.
And I do admit that the NFL and kneeling is a rather small issue but it doesn't mean it can't be discussed.
It's not important enough to me to seek out every sponsor of the NFL, but it does mean I won't be watching.
Possibly ever.