NRA issues condolences

forestal

I'm the Boss of Me
Damn! Looks like I owe you a buck..

Just give me your address and I'll send it to you.

I guess this shows that the current background checks aren't adequate.

What has this world come to, when you can't trust Crazy People to admit they're crazy.


<nyt_headline version="1.0" type=" "> U.S. Rules Made Killer Ineligible to Purchase Gun </nyt_headline>

<nyt_byline version="1.0" type=" "> </nyt_byline>By MICHAEL LUO
<nyt_text> </nyt_text> WASHINGTON, April 20 — Under federal law, the Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho should have been prohibited from buying a gun after a Virginia court declared him to be a danger to himself in late 2005 and sent him for psychiatric treatment, a state official and several legal experts said Friday.

Federal law prohibits anyone who has been “adjudicated as a mental defective,” as well as those who have been involuntarily committed to a mental health facility, from buying a gun.

The special justice’s order in late 2005 that directed Mr. Cho to seek outpatient treatment and declared him to be mentally ill and an imminent danger to himself fits the federal criteria and should have immediately disqualified him, said Richard J. Bonnie, chairman of the Supreme Court of Virginia’s Commission on Mental Health Law Reform.

A spokesman for the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives also said that if Mr. Cho had been found mentally defective by a court, he should have been denied the right to purchase a gun.

Mr. Cho’s ability to buy two guns despite his history has brought new attention to the adequacy of background checks that scrutinize potential gun buyers. And since federal gun laws depend on states for enforcement, the failure of Virginia to flag Mr. Cho highlights the often incomplete information provided by states to federal authorities.

Pete said:
I got a buck that says he didn't "purchase" the firearms legally.
 
R

remaxrealtor

Guest
Nucklesack said:
It’s funny, because all of you Liberal koolaid drinking jizzmers are forever whining and screeching about “Constitutional violations” when the government tracks the phone calls of known terrorists, something that there is not a comma in the Constitution prohibiting, but when it comes to the 2nd Amendment and what it actually says, you seem to have a blind spot. Wonder why that is?

According to CBS News

Seems he has a reciept for the Guns, but its unknown where they were purchased and/or who purchased them. Yet more evidence the Gun laws forestard supports DO NOT WORK

“Irony?” More like “an utterly predictable example of cause and effect.”

Sadly this policy was up for debate and vote last year


Sadly Larry Hincker is partly responsible for yesterdays massacre, unfortunately he'll never be called on it.
The students had, by law, been disarmed and led to slaughter by pansies like Hincker and Brady supporters..
The gun control freaks had, in effect, put up a sign saying “SLAUGHTER AT WILL” outside campus.
32 counts of accessory to murder.

Seems the laws you support, that you (mistakenly) feel will keep the sheeple safe FAILED AGAIN.

The image gungrabbers have to live with.
<img src="http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/wp-content/images/IfOnly.gif">

:yahoo: :love: Proud of this post!
 

Dork

Highlander's MPD
forestal said:
Hey, would you rather try and stop a pipe bomber, or someone with 19 rounds in his 9mm glock?

It's a common sense answer.


:lmao: forestal talks about common sense. What a joke. You are clueless.
 
Top