Polls start to raise some eyebrows...

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure you look like a train wreck compared to what you looked like in YOUR 20s and 30s also. I KNOW I've changed.


I am actually in the best shape of my life and regularly told i look 10 years younger then my actual age.

I don't spend hours a day applying self tanner or getting hair surgeries or wearing insane toupees like some people.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
I am actually in the best shape of my life and regularly told i look 10 years younger then my actual age.

I don't spend hours a day applying self tanner or getting hair surgeries or wearing insane toupees like some people.
Dis you?
sarper.jpg
 

LtownTaxpayer

Well-Known Member
The ticket i voted for said Biden/Harris


It's no different than what they are doing with Trump/Vance hoping Trump can limp across the finish line to be replaced by vance when he strokes out in the next year. Every day Trump looks older and weaker.
You are so full of bullsh!t that your eyes have got to be brown. Is there a direct line to the mothership for this line of crap that democrats are spewing right now.
 

LtownTaxpayer

Well-Known Member
The ticket i voted for said Biden/Harris


It's no different than what they are doing with Trump/Vance hoping Trump can limp across the finish line to be replaced by vance when he strokes out in the next year. Every day Trump looks older and weaker.
Furthermore, this makes NO SENSE. If she needed to replace him, then she should have totally replaced him. This hybrid BS is typical new age democratic wrangling. Insulting to the Constitution AND the electorate and especially Democratic primary voters!
 

LtownTaxpayer

Well-Known Member
The ticket i voted for said Biden/Harris


It's no different than what they are doing with Trump/Vance hoping Trump can limp across the finish line to be replaced by vance when he strokes out in the next year. Every day Trump looks older and weaker.
Last point, the only names on the primary ballots are the presidential candidates. It didn't say Biden/Harris. It said Biden.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Last point, the only names on the primary ballots are the presidential candidates. It didn't say Biden/Harris. It said Biden.

So what.

He they already announced their intention to run together again.

Find a group of angry dems cuz all i hear is Republicans crying about how unfair it is.
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
Why do you suppose Nancy Pelosi never ran for President? (The answer is, because she was FAR more powerful in her House seat than she ever would be as President.)
And the CORRECT answer IS.............

Because Nancy Pelosi could make FAR more money with insider trading and being "in the know" of VARIOUS economic closed door plans that involve and influence traded businesses than she could have while in the White House.

What do I win Johnny??
 

LtownTaxpayer

Well-Known Member
So what.

He they already announced their intention to run together again.

Find a group of angry dems cuz all i hear is Republicans crying about how unfair it is.
Again, you are endorsing the actual threat to democracy. And you can't even keep the story straight. I guess FACTS are fluid in your tiny world.
 

LtownTaxpayer

Well-Known Member
Can't.

They're all out making moltovs and stacking bricks and rocks for tomorrows festivities.
Are they going to protest right up to inauguration day. I still remember that last bull crap riot in 2017. All "the resisters persist" crap and refusing to accept the election. Then they are shocked with people disagree with the 2020 election. I despise the lack of logic. And I really don't like trying to have a discussion with someone who has a fundamental lack of logic. It is like trying to have a rational discussion with a two year old.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Are they going to protest right up to inauguration day. I still remember that last bull crap riot in 2017. All "the resisters persist" crap and refusing to accept the election. Then they are shocked with people disagree with the 2020 election. I despise the lack of logic. And I really don't like trying to have a discussion with someone who has a fundamental lack of logic. It is like trying to have a rational discussion with a two year old.



:yay:
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
And the CORRECT answer IS.............

Because Nancy Pelosi could make FAR more money with insider trading and being "in the know" of VARIOUS economic closed door plans that involve and influence traded businesses than she could have while in the White House.

What do I win Johnny??
I am not so sure of that. Obama came into the White House with one home he owed money on.
Now he still has that one plus a mansion in Hawaii one in Georgetown, and another on Martha's Vineyard.
Clinton went into the White House without a pot to piss in, he got rich there too.
And Joe Biden did not do too bad even though he was handicapped by a mental problem.

No doubt all of our politicians Republican and democrat do not do bad in the financial department ,after all that's why they run, but being a President is not a detriment to getting rich if you are a crook.
 
Last edited:

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
I am not so sure of that. Obama came into the White House with one home he owed money on.
Now he still has that one plus a mansion in Hawaii one in Georgetown, and another on Martha's Vineyard.
Clinton went into the White House without a pot to piss in, he got rich there too.
And Joe Biden did not do too bad even though he was handicapped by a mental problem.

No doubt all of our politicians Republican and democrat do not do bad in the financial department ,after all that's why they run, but being a President is not a detriment to getting rich if you are a crook.
True. The oval office can provide a bounty for whomever occupies it however, most of that is made AFTER one sits in the "big chair." Book deals, speaking engagements, etc.
Congress-turds can get in on the game from Day 1. And it is the gift that keeps on giving... and the gift that you already know what it is, who is giving it to you, and most importantly... when to return it before it loses value :yay:
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The Congress turds get opportunities over years and years for some of them right into death, and then they get laid out at the Capitol Rotunda at our expense, Yet Obama got his while he was in office., and he is still riding the gravy train. Clinton wasn't a slouch while he was in office either. They don't have to retire to write their books and start cleaning up.

I suppose it's an argument without a real answer ,but we can say as Harry Truman did. If you work for the Government and get rich you are a crook.
 

OccamsRazor

Well-Known Member
I suppose it's an argument without a real answer ,but we can say as Harry Truman did. If you work for the Government and get rich you are a crook.
I always say that if you REALLY want to know who wants to be an elected official and do REAL GOOD for the people, offer them a salary, medical benefits, a security detail, and a travel budget. PERIOD! No more perks. No more insider trading protections, no more allowing to vote to opt out of difficulties (shut downs), accountability to be present for votes and bill writing.
Then and ONLY then will you find out who is truly in it to "serve the people."
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
I always say that if you REALLY want to know who wants to be an elected official and do REAL GOOD for the people, offer them a salary, medical benefits, a security detail, and a travel budget. PERIOD! No more perks. No more insider trading protections, no more allowing to vote to opt out of difficulties (shut downs), accountability to be present for votes and bill writing.
Then and ONLY then will you find out who is truly in it to "serve the people."
Sounds reasonable, but I would still add Exploding Collars to the requirement.
 
Top